Advertisement

Development of a return to play checklist following patellar instability surgery: a Delphi-based consensus

  • Alex E. White
  • Rishi Chatterji
  • Saif U. Zaman
  • Christopher J. Hadley
  • Steven B. Cohen
  • Kevin B. Freedman
  • Christopher C. DodsonEmail author
KNEE

Abstract

Purpose

To date, there is no consensus for the appropriate timing or functional evaluation for safe return to play following patellar instability surgery. The purpose of this study is to develop a consensus-based return to play checklist following patellar stabilization surgery using the Delphi method.

Methods

A 3-part survey series was conducted following the systematic guidelines of the Delphi technique for gathering consensus from experts in the management of patellofemoral instability. All surveys were completed between July and November of 2017. A literature search was performed in SCOPUS and PubMed to identify existing sources on return to play following patellar instability surgery and determining patellofemoral joint strength in athletes, which served as the basis for the surveys.

Results

12 of the 19 selected participants (63%) completed the first-round survey, 11 of those 12 participants (92%) completed the second-round survey, and 10 of these 11 participants (91%) completed the final survey. Of the final ten participants, there was representation from seven different states in the USA. Nine of the ten (90%) respondents endorsed the final checklist. The final checklist included eight overarching domains with defined and reproducible objective criteria.

Conclusion

The standardized list of objective and reproducible criteria for rehabilitation outlined below should help practitioners focus more on patient-centred factors and less on arbitrary timelines. No prior study has gathered consensus from experts on this topic; therefore, this study should serve as a benchmark to help guide patients back to sport safely.

Level of evidence

V.

Keywords

Return to play Patellofemoral instability surgery Checklist 

Notes

Funding

Funding was not acquired for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was not required for this study.

Supplementary material

167_2019_5510_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (320 kb)
Supplementary file1 (PDF 320 kb)
167_2019_5510_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
Supplementary file2 (PDF 1175 kb)
167_2019_5510_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (118 kb)
Supplementary file3 (PDF 118 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Waterman B, Belmont P, Owens B (2012) Patellar dislocation in the United States: role of sex, age, race, and athletic participation. J Knee Surg 25:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cofield R, Bryan R (1977) Acute dislocation of the patella: results of conservative treatment. J Trauma 17:526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fithian D, Paxton E, Stone M, Silva P, Davis D, Elias D, White L (2004) Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 32:1114–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hawkins R, Bell R, Anisette G (1986) Acute patellar dislocations: the natural history. Am J Sports Med 14:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krych A, O’Malley M, Johnson N, Mohan R, Hewett T, Stuart M, Dahm D (2018) Functional testing and return to sport following stabilization surgery for recurrent lateral patellar instability in competitive athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maenpaa H, Huhtala H, Lehto M (1997) Recurrence after patellar dislocation. Redislocation in 37/75 patients followed for 6–24 years. Acta Orthop Scand 68:424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camp C, Heidenreich M, Dahm D, Stuart M, Levy B, Krych A (2016) Individualizing the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: patellar instability ratios that predict recurrent instability. Am J Sports Med 44:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Yamamoto Y, Maeda S (2012) Incidence and radiologic predictor of postoperative patellar instability after Fulkerson procedure of the tibial tuberosity for recurrent patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2062–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zaman S, White A, Shi W, Freedman K, Dodson C (2017) Return-to-play guidelines after medial patellofemoral ligament surgery for recurrent patellar instability: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 46(10):2530–2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherman SL, Deasis D, Garrone A, Voss E, Oliver H (2018) Return to play after patellar stabilization. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 11:280–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsu C, Sandford B (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval 12:1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sprague S, Quigley L, Bhandari M (2009) Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmad R, Calciu M, Jayasekera N, Schranz P, Mandalia V (2017) Combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tubercle transfer results at a follow-up of 2 years. J Knee Surg 30:42–46Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ando T, Hirose H, Inoue M, Shino K, Doi T (1993) A new method using computed topographic scan to measure the rectus femoris-patellar tendon Q-angle comparison with conventional method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 289:213–219Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beckert M, Albright J, Zavala J, Chang J, Albright J (2016) Clinical accuracy of J-sign measurement compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Iowa Orthop J 36:94–97Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Costain R, Williams A (1984) lsokinetic quadriceps and hamstring torque levels of adolescent, female soccer players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 5:196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dallinga J, Benjaminse A, Lemmink K (2012) Which screening tools can predict injury to the lower extremities in team sports? A systematic review. Sports Med 42:791–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fitzgerald G, McClure P (1995) Reliability of measurements obtained with four tests for patellofemoral alignment. Phys Ther 75:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grelsamer R, Weinstein C, Gould J, Dubey A (2008) Patellar tilt: the physical examination correlates with MR imaging. Knee 15:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gribble P, Hertel J, Plisky P (2012) Using the star excursion balance test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. Athl Train 47:339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hinckel B, Gobbi R, Kihara Filho E, Demange M, Pecora J, Camanho G (2015) Patellar tendon-trochlear groove angle measurement: a new method for patellofemoral rotational analyses. Orthop J Sports Med 3(9):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Irwin L, Bagga T (1998) Quadriceps pull test: an outcome predictor for lateral retinacular release in recurrent patellar dislocation. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:40–42Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Junge T, Jespersen E, Wedderkopp N, Juul-Kristensen B (2013) Inter-tester reproducibility and inter-method agreement of two variations of the Beighton test for determining generalised joint hypermobility in primary school children. BMC Pediatr 13:214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kinzey S, Armstrong CW (1998) The reliability of the star-excursion test in assessing dynamic balance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krych A, Woodcock J, Morgan J, Levy B, Stuart M, Dahm D (2015) Factors associated with excellent 6-month functional and isokinetic test results following ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1053–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McConnell J, Man Ther G (2007) Rehabilitation and nonoperative treatment of patellar instability. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 15:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Menetrey J, Putman S, Gard S (2014) Return to sport after patellar dislocation or following surgery for patellofemoral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2320–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Monson J, Arendt E (2012) Rehabilitative protocols for select patellofemoral procedures and nonoperative management schemes. Sports Med Arthrosc 20:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moriartis Wolf J, Cameron K, Owens B (2011) Impact of joint laxity and hypermobility on the musculoskeletal system. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nonweiler D, DeLee J (1994) The diagnosis and treatment of medial subluxation of the patellar after lateral retinacular release. Am J Sports Med 22:680–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Noyes F, Barber-Westin S, Fleckenstein C, Walsh C, West J (2005) The drop-jump screening test: difference in lower limb control by gender and effect of neuromuscular training in female athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paxton E, Fithian D, Stone M, Silva P (2003) The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med 31:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sallay P, Poggi J, Speer K, Garrett W (1996) Acute dislocation of the patella. A correlative pathoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med 24:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shakespeare D, Fick D (2005) Patellar instability-can the TT-TG distance be measured clinically? Knee 12:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheehan F, Derasari A, Fine K, Brindle T, Alter K (2010) Q-angle and J-sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith T, Hunt N, Donell S (2008) The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1068–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tensho K, Akaoka Y, Shimodaira H, Takanashi S, Ikegami S, Kato H, Saito N (2015) What components comprise the measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in a patellar dislocation population? J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:1441–1448Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Watson C, Leddy H, Dynjan T, Parham J (2001) Reliability of the lateral pull test and tilt test to assess patellar alignment in subjects with symptomatic knees: student raters. Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31:368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fisher B, Nyland J, Brand E, Curtin B (2010) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation: a systematic review including rehabilitation and return-to-sports efficacy. Arthroscopy 26:1384–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Longo U, Berton A, Salvatore G, Migliorini F, Ciuffreda M, Nazarian A, Denaro V (2016) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with bony procedures for patellar instability: current indications, outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy 32:1421–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smith T, Davies L, Chester R, Clark A, Donell S (2010) Clinical outcomes of rehabilitation for patients following lateral patellar dislocation: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 96:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ahmad C, McCarthy M, Gomez J, Shubin Stein B (2009) The moving patellar apprehension test for lateral patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 37:791–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gokeler A, Benjaminse A, van Eck C, Webster K, Schot L, Otten E (2013) Return of normal gait as an outcome measurement in ACL reconstructed patients. A systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 8:441–451Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Timoney J, Inman W, Quesada P, Sharkey P, Barrack R, Skinner H, Alexander A (1993) Return of normal gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 21:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kouvelioti V, Kellis E, Kofotolis N, Amiridis I (2015) Reliability of single-leg and double-leg balance tests in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls. Res Sports Med 23:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kline P, Johnson D, Ireland M, Noehren B (2016) Clinical predictors of knee mechanics at return to sport following ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 48:790–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schelin L, Tengman E, Ryden P, Hager C A statistically compiled test battery for feasible evaluation of knee function after rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament—derived from long-term follow-up data. PLoS One 12:1–18Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bodkin S, Goetschius J, Hertel J, Hart J (2017) Relationships of muscle function and subjective knee function in patients after ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 5:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bolgla L, Keskula D (1997) Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 26:138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Diaz-Ledezma C, Higuera C, Parvizi J (2013) Success after treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a Delphi-based international multidisciplinary consensus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:2374–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex E. White
    • 1
  • Rishi Chatterji
    • 1
  • Saif U. Zaman
    • 2
  • Christopher J. Hadley
    • 2
  • Steven B. Cohen
    • 2
  • Kevin B. Freedman
    • 2
  • Christopher C. Dodson
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Rothman InstitutePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations