Advertisement

Single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone grafting for posterior or widening tibial tunnels restores stability of the knee and improves clinical outcomes

  • Jason L. DragooEmail author
  • Michael Kalisvaart
  • Kevin M. Smith
  • George Pappas
  • Ray Golish
KNEE
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Revision ACL surgery may be complicated by tunnel malposition and/or tunnel widening and often requires a staged treatment approach that includes bone grafting, a period of several months to allow bone graft incorporation and then definitive revision ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a single-staged ACL revision reconstruction technique using a cylindrical dowel bone graft for patients who have existing posteriorly placed and/or widened tibial tunnels in the tibia at a minimum of 2 years follow-up.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2014, patients undergoing single-stage revision ACL reconstruction with the described technique were prospectively enrolled and evaluated. At a minimum of 24 months, patients were evaluated by physical examination, multiple clinical outcome instruments including KOOS, Tegner and Lysholm, and preoperative and postoperative MRIs.

Results

At a mean of 35.1 months, 18 consecutive patients had no revision surgery and no subjective knee instability. There were statistically significant improvements in the Tegner (median 2, interquartile range 2.25; p < 0.01), Lysholm (20.0 ± 15.0; p < 0.01), KOOS symptoms scale (12.9 ± 11.8; p < 0.01), KOOS pain scale (15.4 ± 18.7; p < 0.01), KOOS ADL scale (13.5 ± 19.0; p < 0.01), KOOS sports scale (32.8 ± 26.4; p < 0.01), and KOOS QoL scale (18.1 ± 16.9; p < 0.01). Postoperative MRI demonstrated statistically significant anteriorization of the tibial tunnel and a statistically significant decrease in tunnel widening.

Conclusion

Revision ACL reconstruction utilizing a single-staged tibial tunnel grafting technique resulted in improved knee pain, function, and stability at a minimum of 24-month follow-up.

Level of evidence

IV.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament ACL Revision reconstruction Single-stage Tibial tunnel Malposition Bone grafting Tunnel widening 

Notes

Funding

No funding was necessary for the completion of this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Ethical approval and informed consent

IRB approval and informed consent was obtained for this investigation.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 33662 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Bach BR Jr (2003) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopy 19(suppl 1):14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrett GR, Brown TD (2007) Femoral tunnel defect filled with a synthetic dowel graft for a single-staged revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:796.e1–796.e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Battaglia MJ 2nd, Cordasco FA, Hannafin JA et al (2007) Results of revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 35:2057–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Battaglia TC, Miller MD (2005) Management of bony deficiency in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using allograft bone dowels: surgical technique. Arthroscopy 21:767.e1–767.e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buelow JU, Siebold R, Ellermann A (2002) A prosective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheatham SA, Johnson DL (2010) Anatomic revision ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clatworthy MG, Annear P, Bulow JU, Bartlett RJ (1999) Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diamantopoulos AP, Lorbach O, Paessler HH (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results in 107 patients. Am J Sports Med 36:851–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fules PJ, Goddard RK, Madhav RT et al (2003) Instrument-guided semitendinosus-gracilis tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament replacement using a polyester tape and cortical fixation device. Orthopedics 26:688–692Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Getelman MH, Friedman MJ (1999) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linn RM, Fischer DA, Smith JP, Burstein DB, Quick DC (1993) Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 21:825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maak TG, Voos JE, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2010) Tunnel widening in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mayr R, Rosenberger R, Agraharam D, Smekal V, El Attal R (2012) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an update. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1299–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ohly NE, Murray IR, Keating JF (2007) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: timing of surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and degenerative change. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:1051–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ra HJ, Ha JK, Kim JG (2013) One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with impacted bone graft after failed primary reconstruction. Orthopedics 36:860–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robinson J, Huber C, Jaraj P, Colombet P, Allard M, Meyer P (2006) Reduced bone tunnel enlargement post hamstring ACL reconstruction with poly-l-lactic acid/hydroxyapatite bioabsorbable screws. Knee 13:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sadoghi P, Kröpfl A, Jansson V, Müller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomas NP, Kankate R, Wandless F, Pandit H (2005) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a 2-stage technique with bone grafting of the tibial tunnel. Am J Sports Med 33:1701–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vaughn ZD, Schmidt J, Lindsey DP, Dragoo JL (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of a 1-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique using a structural bone void filler for femoral fixation. Arthroscopy 25:1011–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wright RW, Gill CS, Chen L et al (2012) Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilde J, Bedi A, Altcheck DW (2014) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 6(6):504–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoon KH, Kim JS, Park SY, Park SE. One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results according to preoperative bone tunnel diameter: five to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100(12):993–1000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason L. Dragoo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Kalisvaart
    • 1
  • Kevin M. Smith
    • 1
  • George Pappas
    • 1
  • Ray Golish
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryStanford UniversityRedwood CityUSA

Personalised recommendations