Single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone grafting for posterior or widening tibial tunnels restores stability of the knee and improves clinical outcomes
- 34 Downloads
Revision ACL surgery may be complicated by tunnel malposition and/or tunnel widening and often requires a staged treatment approach that includes bone grafting, a period of several months to allow bone graft incorporation and then definitive revision ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a single-staged ACL revision reconstruction technique using a cylindrical dowel bone graft for patients who have existing posteriorly placed and/or widened tibial tunnels in the tibia at a minimum of 2 years follow-up.
Between 2010 and 2014, patients undergoing single-stage revision ACL reconstruction with the described technique were prospectively enrolled and evaluated. At a minimum of 24 months, patients were evaluated by physical examination, multiple clinical outcome instruments including KOOS, Tegner and Lysholm, and preoperative and postoperative MRIs.
At a mean of 35.1 months, 18 consecutive patients had no revision surgery and no subjective knee instability. There were statistically significant improvements in the Tegner (median 2, interquartile range 2.25; p < 0.01), Lysholm (20.0 ± 15.0; p < 0.01), KOOS symptoms scale (12.9 ± 11.8; p < 0.01), KOOS pain scale (15.4 ± 18.7; p < 0.01), KOOS ADL scale (13.5 ± 19.0; p < 0.01), KOOS sports scale (32.8 ± 26.4; p < 0.01), and KOOS QoL scale (18.1 ± 16.9; p < 0.01). Postoperative MRI demonstrated statistically significant anteriorization of the tibial tunnel and a statistically significant decrease in tunnel widening.
Revision ACL reconstruction utilizing a single-staged tibial tunnel grafting technique resulted in improved knee pain, function, and stability at a minimum of 24-month follow-up.
Level of evidence
KeywordsAnterior cruciate ligament ACL Revision reconstruction Single-stage Tibial tunnel Malposition Bone grafting Tunnel widening
No funding was necessary for the completion of this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this article.
Ethical approval and informed consent
IRB approval and informed consent was obtained for this investigation.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 33662 KB)
- 9.Fules PJ, Goddard RK, Madhav RT et al (2003) Instrument-guided semitendinosus-gracilis tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament replacement using a polyester tape and cortical fixation device. Orthopedics 26:688–692Google Scholar
- 22.Yoon KH, Kim JS, Park SY, Park SE. One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results according to preoperative bone tunnel diameter: five to fifteen-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100(12):993–1000Google Scholar