An intact subscapularis tendon and compensatory teres minor hypertrophy yield lower failure rates for non-operative treatment of irreparable, massive rotator cuff tears
To investigate whether subscapularis integrity and compensatory teres, minor hypertrophy is associated with maintaining relatively good function and tolerable pain levels during non-operative treatment.
This study included 108 patients with irreparable, massive rotator cuff tears involving at least two tendons and stage III or IV muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration on oblique sagittal magnetic resonance imaging, in which even a partial repair does not seem feasible. All supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles were grade IV; if the subscapularis was involved, only stage III or IV was included. Patients were divided into two groups: group A consisted of 67 patients with both an intact subscapularis and teres minor hypertrophy; group B consisted of 41 patients lacking either one or both. The Visual Analogue Scale pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score, and active range of motion (ROM) were assessed.
During the follow-up period, failure of non-operative treatment was found in 29 (43%) patients in group A and 28 (68%) in group B (p = 0.012). Conversion to surgery was noted in 26 (39%) patients in group A and 27 (66%) in group B (p = 0.006). Among the remaining nonsurgical patients, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups except ROM in internal rotation at final follow-up.
Although conservative treatment was not always successful in patients with irreparable, massive cuff tears, patients with both an intact subscapularis tendon, and teres minor hypertrophy experienced significantly lower incidences of failure and conversion to surgery, since force couple is maintained in the setting of minimal arthritis.
Level of evidence
KeywordsIrreparable Rotator cuff tear Non-operative Subscapularis Teres minor
The authors received no financial support related with the current study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethical committee of the institution.
- 13.Itoi E, Tabata S (1992) Conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992(275):165–173Google Scholar
- 29.Slabaugh MA, Friel NA, Karas V, Romeo AA, Verma NN, Cole BJ (2012) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Goutallier classification using magnetic resonance imaging: proposal of a simplified classification system to increase reliability. Am J Sports Med 40:1728–1734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Tashjian RZ, Hung M, Keener JD, Bowen RC, McAllister J, Chen W et al (2017) Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26:144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C (2005) Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1476–1486Google Scholar
- 32.Zingg PO, Jost B, Sukthankar A, Buhler M, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C (2007) Clinical and structural outcomes of nonoperative management of massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1928–1934Google Scholar