Advertisement

Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty provides good functional stability during high-flexion weight-bearing activities

  • Kenichi Kono
  • Hiroshi InuiEmail author
  • Tetsuya Tomita
  • Takaharu Yamazaki
  • Shuji Taketomi
  • Kazuomi Sugamoto
  • Sakae Tanaka
KNEE
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) uses a dual-post-cam mechanism as a substitute for the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), with the surface geometry providing additional guidance for axial rotation and posterior translation. However, the effect of weight-bearing on the kinematics of BCS-TKA has not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the effect of weight-bearing on the kinematics of BCS-TKA during high-flexion activities.

Methods

The kinematics of 11 BCS-TKAs were evaluated under fluoroscopy, with two- and three-dimensional image registration, during squatting weight-bearing and active-assisted knee flexion non-weight-bearing. The following variables were measured: knee range of motion, axis of femoral rotation relative to the tibial component, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial contact point, kinematic path of the joint surfaces, lateral femorotibial contact point, and anterior and post-cam engagement.

Results

The weight-bearing condition did not influence the range of knee flexion, axis of femoral rotation, medial pivot pattern during early flexion, or bicondylar rollback beyond mid-flexion. With regard to AP translation, both the medial and lateral contact points had more posterior locations in weight-bearing than in non-weight-bearing at the mid-flexion angle. Anterior engagement was identified in 6/11 knees (54.5%) in weight-bearing and 4/11 knees (36.3%) in non-weight-bearing. Post-cam engagement was observed in all knees, with the angle of flexion at engagement being larger in weight-bearing than in non-weight-bearing.

Conclusion

Although weight-bearing resulted in a posterior location of the medial and lateral contact points of the BCS-TKA design compared with non-weight-bearing in the mid-range of knee flexion, the amount of anterior translation was small overall. Therefore, BCS-TKA provides good stability during high-flexion weight-bearing activities. However, BCS-TKA is associated with high rate of the anterior engagement during early flexion. Therefore, understanding a patient’s activities is an important factor when selecting the most appropriate TKA method.

Keywords

Bicruciate-stabilised total knee arthroplasty High flexion Kinematics Weight-bearing 

Notes

Funding

There is no funding source.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was received for this study.

Informed consent

All patients provided written informed consent.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 4979 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Arbuthnot JE, Brink RB (2009) Assessment of the antero-posterior and rotational stability of the anterior cruciate ligament analogue in a guided motion bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Med Eng Technol 33:610–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA (1997) In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 12:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brilhault J, Ries MD (2010) Measuring patellar height using the lateral active flexion radiograph: effect of total knee implant design. Knee 17:148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Catani F, Ensini A, Belvedere C, Feliciangeli A, Benedetti MG, Leardini A et al (2009) In vivo kinematics and kinetics of a bi-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty: a combined fluoroscopic and gait analysis study. J Orthop Res 27:1569–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS et al (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:114–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Walker SA, Tucker A (2004) A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujimoto E, Sasashige Y, Tomita T, Iwamoto K, Masuda Y, Hisatome T (2014) Significant effect of the posterior tibial slope on the weight-bearing, midflexion in vivo kinematics after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:2324–2330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grieco TF, Sharma A, Dessinger GM, Cates HE, Komistek RD (2018) In vivo kinematic comparison of a bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty and the normal knee using fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty 33:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hada M, Mizu-Uchi H, Okazaki K, Kaneko T, Murakami K, Ma Y et al (2018) Bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty can reduce the risk of knee instability associated with posterior tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1709–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horiuchi H, Akizuki S, Tomita T, Sugamoto K, Yamazaki T, Shimizu N (2012) In vivo kinematic analysis of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing and non–weight-bearing deep knee bending. J Arthroplasty 27:1196–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inui H, Taketomi S, Yamagami R, Shirakawa N, Kawaguchi K, Tanaka S (2018) The relationship between soft-tissue balance and intraoperative kinematics of guided motion total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636545 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaneko T, Kono N, Mochizuki Y, Hada M, Toyoda S, Musha Y (2017) Bi-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty improved medio-lateral instability in mid-flexion range. J Orthop 14:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitagawa A, Tsumura N, Chin T, Gamada K, Banks SA, Kurosaka M (2010) In vivo comparison of knee kinematics before and after high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:964–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 40:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kono K, Tomita T, Futai K, Yamazaki T, Tanaka S, Yoshikawa H et al (2018) In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of normal knees during different high-flexion activities. Bone Jt J 100-b:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuroyanagi Y, Mu S, Hamai S, Robb WJ, Banks SA (2012) In vivo knee kinematics during stair and deep flexion activities in patients with bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lavallee S, Szeliski R (1995) Recovering the position and orientation of free-form objects from image contours using 3D distance maps. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 17:378–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luyckx L, Luyckx T, Bellemans J, Victor J (2010) Iliotibial band traction syndrome in guided motion TKA. A new clinical entity after TKA. Acta Orthop Belg 76:507–512Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moro-oka TA, Hamai S, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ et al (2008) Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 26:428–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murakami K, Hamai S, Okazaki K, Ikebe S, Shimoto T, Hara D et al (2016) In vivo kinematics of healthy male knees during squat and golf swing using image-matching techniques. Knee 23:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nakamura S, Ito H, Yoshitomi H, Kuriyama S, Komistek RD, Matsuda S (2015) Analysis of the flexion gap on in vivo knee kinematics using fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty 30:1237–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scarvell JM, Perriman DM, Smith PN, Campbell DG, Bruce WJM, Nivbrant B (2017) Total knee arthroplasty using bicruciate-stabilized or posterior-stabilized knee implants provided comparable outcomes at 2 years: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial of patient outcomes. J Arthroplasty 32:3356–3363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shelburne KB, Pandy MG (1998) Determinants of cruciate-ligament loading during rehabilitation exercise. Clin Biomech 13:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shimizu N, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K (2011) The effect of weight-bearing condition on kinematics of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 26:1031–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA (1999) Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Paxson RD, Hoff WA (1995) Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 77:884–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsukiyama H, Kuriyama S, Kobayashi M, Nakamura S, Furu M, Ito H et al (2017) Medial rather than lateral knee instability correlates with inferior patient satisfaction and knee function after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 24:1478–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Victor J, Bellemans J (2006) Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Victor J, Mueller JK, Komistek RD, Sharma A, Nadaud MC, Bellemans J (2010) In vivo kinematics after a cruciate-substituting TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:807–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yamazaki T, Watanabe T, Nakajima Y, Sugamoto K, Tomita T, Maeda D et al (2005) Visualization of femorotibial contact in total knee arthroplasty using X-ray fluoroscopy. Eur J Radiol 53:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yamazaki T, Watanabe T, Nakajima Y, Sugamoto K, Tomita T, Yoshikawa H et al (2004) Improvement of depth position in 2-D/3-D registration of knee implants using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:602–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M, Kurosaka M (2005) In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 20:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Moynihan AL, Liu F, Rubash HE, Li G (2011) Kinematics of medial osteoarthritic knees before and after posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 29:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zambianchi F, Fiacchi F, Lombari V, Venturelli L, Marcovigi A, Giorgini A et al (2018) Changes in total knee arthroplasty design affect in-vivo kinematics in a redesigned total knee system: a fluoroscopy study. Clin Biomech 54:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zuffi S, Leardini A, Catani F, Fantozzi S, Cappello A (1999) A model-based method for the reconstruction of total knee replacement kinematics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenichi Kono
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Inui
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tetsuya Tomita
    • 3
  • Takaharu Yamazaki
    • 4
  • Shuji Taketomi
    • 2
  • Kazuomi Sugamoto
    • 3
  • Sakae Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial ScienceOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaJapan
  4. 4.Saitama Institute of TechnologyFukayaJapan

Personalised recommendations