Management of acute knee dislocations: anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option—results of a multicentre study
- 83 Downloads
The literature shows no consensus regarding the best method and timing for the treatment of acute knee dislocations. Studies indicate that a one-stage procedure performed in the early stages of injury can lead to superior results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after performing early surgical repair with additional suture augmentation (ligament bracing) of all torn ligaments in acute knee dislocations.
In this prospective multicentre study, 73 patients with an acute type III or IV knee dislocation were treated with one-stage ligament bracing within 10 days. Twenty-six patients sustained a type III medial dislocation, thirty-nine patients sustained a type III lateral dislocation, and eight patients presented a type IV dislocation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Within the follow-up evaluation, various scores were collected (International Knee Documentation Committee IKDC Score, Tegner Score and Lysholm Score). Additional stress radiography was performed (Telos™) postoperatively.
Sixty-nine knee dislocations (Schenck III and IV) with a follow-up at a mean of 14 ± 1.6 months were evaluated. The average IKDC score was 75.5 ± 14.5, the average Lysholm score was 81.0 ± 15.5, and the median loss of activity in the Tegner score was 1 (range 0–3) point. Stress radiographs showed side-to-side differences at a mean of 3.2 ± 1.3 mm for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of 2.9 ± 2.1 mm for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The operative revision rate (early and late) was 17.4%. In the early stage, one wound infection and one case of transient common peroneal nerve (CPN) paresis were successfully revised. In the later stage, four patients with knee stiffness and six cases with symptomatic knee instability needed reoperation. Patients without ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations or CPN showed good or excellent results in 87.5% according to the Lysholm score.
In cases of acute knee dislocation, primary ACL and PCL transosseous sutures with additional suture augmentation predominantly lead to good and excellent clinical results. Obese patients sustaining ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations and patients following injury to the CPN show inferior outcomes. In patients without ULV and CPN intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 10.1%. The obtained results and revision rates show that early primary suture repair is a promising option.
Level of evidence
Prospective multicentre study, II.
KeywordsKnee Knee dislocation Suture repair ACL PCL Ligament bracing
The study was funded by Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval was given by the ethics committee of the Medical Chamber of Hamburg, Germany (ID PV4458).
- 2.Almekinders LC, Logan TC (1992) Results following treatment of traumatic dislocations of the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284:203–207Google Scholar
- 13.Heitmann M, Dratzidis A, Jagodzinski M, Wohlmuth P, Hurschler C, Püschel K, Giannakos A, Preiss A, Frosch KH (2014) Ligament bracing—augmented cruciate ligament sutures: Biomechanical studies of a new treatment concept | Ligament bracing- die augmentierte Kreuzbandnaht: Biomechanische Grundlagen für ein neues Behandlungskonzept. Unfallchirurg 117:650–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Heitmann M, Gerau M, Hötzel J, Giannakos A, Frosch KH, Preiss A (2014) Ligament bracing-augmented primary suture repair in multiligamentous knee injuries | Ligament bracing-augmentierte primärnaht bei multiligamentären verletzungen des kniegelenks. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Petri M, Ettinger M, Dratzidis A, Liodakis E, Brand S, Albrecht UV, Hurschler C, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M (2012) Comparison of three suture techniques and three suture materials on gap formation and failure load in ruptured tendons: a human cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Sisto DJ, Warren RF (1985) Complete knee dislocation. A follow-up study of operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:94–101Google Scholar
- 43.Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49Google Scholar