The discrepancy between patient expectations and actual outcome reduces at the first 6 months following total knee replacement surgery
- 53 Downloads
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty often have unfulfilled expectations from the surgery that can lead to dissatisfaction. This study aimed to examine the discrepancy between patients’ expectations and actual functional abilities prior to undergoing knee replacement surgery, and at 6 and 12 months following the surgery.
A survey was undertaken of patients before, and 6 and 12 months post-surgery. The survey included the Knee Surgery Perception Questionnaire (KSPQ) to assess patients’ current perception of their level of function and pain, their desired outcomes, and the discrepancy between the two. Pain, function and quality of life were also assessed. Repeated measure ANOVAs were used to assess differences between pre- and post-surgery.
A total of 176 patients were surveyed. Significant differences in the KSPQ discrepancy scores (subscale and total scores) were demonstrated between the three assessment point times (p < 0.01). Paired t tests identified significant differences between the pre-surgery and 6-month KSPQ discrepancy scores, (p < 0.01) indicative of substantial improvement in physical function and slight reduction in expectations. Overall significant improvement (p < 0.01) was reported over time across all measures: physical function, pain and stiffness and quality of life.
The discrepancy between patients’ current abilities and their expectation changes following surgery, especially in the first 6 months post-surgery. Patients’ goals might change as their function and pain improve post-surgery. Combining education programmes and discussion with the treating orthopaedic surgeons pre-operatively is important for the development of realistic, achievable expectations.
Level of evidence
KeywordsKnee replacement Discrepancy Expectations Satisfaction TKR TKA
The authors would like to thank Elin Wee and Soula Margelis for their assistance with patient recruitment and data collection.
No external funding was used.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval was received from the La Trobe University Human Research Ethics Committee (FHEC09/230).
- 3.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R (2007) Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): MR000008Google Scholar
- 15.Jain D, Nguyen LL, Bendich I, Nguyen LL, Lewis CG, Huddleston JI, Duwelius PJ, Feeley BT, Bozic KJ (2017) Higher patient expectations predict higher patient-reported outcomes, but not satisfaction, in total knee arthroplasty patients: a prospective multicenter study. J Arthroplasty 32(9S):S166–S170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Jones AC, Suarez-Almazor ME (2017) Patients expectations and total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Outcomes Manag 24(8):364–370Google Scholar
- 22.Levinger P, Diamond NT, Menz HB, Wee E, Margelis S, Stewart AG, Bartlett JR, Bergman NB, McMahon S, Hare DL, Hill K (2016) Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing discrepancy between patients’ pre-surgery expectations and abilities and post-surgical outcomes following knee replacement surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3359–3368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.SF-36 physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1 (1997) The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, BostonGoogle Scholar