Advertisement

Femoral tunnel widening is similar between anteromedial portal and transtibial techniques following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Ho Jong Ra
  • Haluk Celik
  • Hyun-Jun Kim
  • Dae-Hee Lee
KNEE

Abstract

Purpose

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is concern regarding the potential risk of femoral tunnel widening in the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique due to the acute graft-bending angle at the aperture and the more elliptical aperture shape of the femoral tunnel compared to the transtibial (TT) techniques. Therefore, the aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the femoral tunnel widening between the AMP and TT techniques in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.

Methods

It should be included the studies that reported on femoral tunnel widening in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction, using soft-tissue tendon graft, with AMP and/or TT techniques. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction.

Results

Twenty-one studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled changes of absolute millimeters of tunnel widening from the immediate postoperative status to the last follow-up did not differ significantly between the AMP and TT techniques at both the aperture [3.31 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–5.0. mm versus 2.9 mm, 95% CI 2.4–3.4 mm, P = n.s.] and the midportion (3.5 mm, 95% CI 0.8–6.3 mm versus 3.0 mm, 95% CI 2.2–3.9 mm, P = n.s.) of the femoral tunnel. No significant difference was observed between the two techniques in the relative percentage of femoral tunnel widening (AMP; 28.8%, 95% CI 14.8–42.9% vs. TT; 29.7%, 95% CI 15.6–43.7%, P = n.s.).

Conclusion

No significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was observed between the AMP and TT techniques, both in absolute millimeter and relative percentage, in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. This finding could alleviate the potential concerns associated with femoral tunnels being wider for the AMP than for the TT technique.

Level of evidence

III.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Tunnel widening Anteromedial portal Transtibial 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by SMC-Ottogi Research Fund (SMX1162171).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Achtnich A, Stiepani H, Forkel P, Metzlaff S, Hanninen EL, Petersen W (2013) Tunnel widening after anatomic double-bundle and mid-position single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29:1514–1524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aga C, Wilson KJ, Johansen S, Dornan G, La Prade RF, Engebretsen L (2017) Tunnel widening in single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1316–1327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gotzsche PC, Lang T, Consort G (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134:663–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asik M, Sen C, Tuncay I, Erdil M, Avci C, Taser OF (2007) The mid- to long-term results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons using Transfix technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:965–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Hart JA, Miller MD, Barr MS, Hart JM (2008) Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1108–1113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bin SI (2017) Have evolving surgical methods improved clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Relat Res 29:1–2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Nilles KM, Harner CD (2006) Tunnel expansion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstrings: a comparison of the medial portal and transtibial techniques. Arthroscopy 22:1107–1112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi NH, Yang BS, Victoroff BN (2017) Clinical and radiological outcomes after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: comparison between fixed-loop and adjustable-loop cortical suspension devices. Am J Sports Med 45:826–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2013) Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 29:1330–1337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hensler D, Working ZM, Illingworth KD, Thorhauer ED, Tashman S, Fu FH (2011) Medial portal drilling: effects on the femoral tunnel aperture morphology during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2063–2071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollis R, West H, Greis P, Brown N, Burks R (2009) Autologous bone effects on femoral tunnel widening in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22:114–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hwang DH, Shetty GM, Kim JI, Kwon JH, Song JK, Munoz M, Lee JS, Nha KW (2013) Does press-fit technique reduce tunnel volume enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons? A prospective randomized computed tomography study. Arthroscopy 29:83–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iorio R, Di Sanzo V, Vadala A, Conteduca J, Mazza D, Redler A, Bolle G, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2013) ACL reconstruction with hamstrings: how different technique and fixation devices influence bone tunnel enlargement. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 17:2956–2961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique. A clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:290–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeon YS, Choi SW, Park JH, Yoon JS, Shin JS, Kim MK (2017) Mid-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Relat Res 29:19–25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawaguchi Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Kai S, Inoue M, Yasuda K (2011) Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1249–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kong CG, In Y, Kim GH, Ahn CY (2012) Cross pins versus endobutton femoral fixation in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 4-year follow-up. Knee Surg Relat Res 24:34–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lanzetti RM, Lupariello D, De Carli A, Monaco E, Guzzini M, Fabbri M, Vadala A, Ferretti A (2017) Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27:659–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee BH, Bansal S, Park SH, Wang JH (2015) Eccentric graft positioning within the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal and outside-in techniques. Am J Sports Med 43:1180–1188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lind M, Feller J, Webster KE (2009) Tibial bone tunnel widening is reduced by polylactate/hydroxyapatite interference screws compared to metal screws after ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts. Knee 16:447–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu A, Sun M, Ma C, Chen Y, Xue X, Guo P, Shi Z, Yan S (2017) Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2751–2759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mermerkaya MU, Atay OA, Kaymaz B, Bekmez S, Karaaslan F, Doral MN (2015) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft: a retrospective comparison of tunnel widening upon use of two different femoral fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2283–2291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mirzatolooei F, Alamdari MT, Khalkhali HR (2013) The impact of platelet-rich plasma on the prevention of tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled autologous hamstring tendon: a randomised clinical trial. Bone Joint J 95-b:65–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moisala AS, Jarvela T, Paakkala A, Paakkala T, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2008) Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1080–1086CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nebelung S, Deitmer G, Gebing R, Reichwein F, Nebelung W (2012) High incidence of tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial femoral tunnel placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:1653–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37:1434–1443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Otsuka H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Sasaki K, Toh S (2003) Comparison of three techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Differences in anterior tibial translation and tunnel enlargement with each technique. Am J Sports Med 31:282–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ro KH, Kim HJ, Lee DH (2018) The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2371–2380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robbrecht C, Claes S, Cromheecke M, Mahieu P, Kakavelakis K, Victor J, Bellemans J, Verdonk P (2014) Reliability of a semi-automated 3D-CT measuring method for tunnel diameters after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between soft-tissue single-bundle allograft vs. autograft. Knee 21:926–931CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sabat D, Kundu K, Arora S, Kumar V (2011) Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography–based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft. Arthroscopy 27:776–783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sabzevari S, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Shaikh HS, Arner JW, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2017) Increased lateral tibial posterior slope is related to tibial tunnel widening after primary ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3906–3913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saccomanno MF, Shin JJ, Mascarenhas R, Haro M, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr (2014) Clinical and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cortical button fixation versus transfemoral suspensory fixation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 30:1491–1498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saygi B, Karaman O, Sirin E, Arslan I, Demir A, Oztermeli A (2016) Comparison of different femoral fixation implants and fit techniques for tunnel widening and clinical outcome in ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:241–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T (2005) Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 21:439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Segawa H, Omori G, Tomita S, Koga Y (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:206–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shin YS, Ro KH, Jeon JH, Lee DH (2014) Graft-bending angle and femoral tunnel length after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the transtibial, anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques. Bone Joint J 96-b:743–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Siebold R, Kiss ZS, Morris HG (2008) Effect of compaction drilling during ACL reconstruction with hamstrings on postoperative tunnel widening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:461–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E (2010) Femoral tunnel enlargement after anatomic ACL reconstruction: a biological problem? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1189–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Surer L, Yapici C, Guglielmino C, van Eck CF, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2017) Fibrin clot prevents bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:1555–1560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tashiro Y, Irarrazaval S, Osaki K, Iwamoto Y, Fu FH (2017) Comparison of graft bending angle during knee motion after outside-in, trans-portal and trans-tibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:129–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Uzumcugil O, Yalcinkaya M, Ozturkmen Y, Dikmen G, Caniklioglu M (2012) Effect of PEEK polymer on tunnel widening after hamstring ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 35:e654–e659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vadala A, Iorio R, De Carli A, Argento G, Di Sanzo V, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2007) The effect of accelerated, brace free, rehabilitation on bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:365–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Webster KE, Feller JA, Elliott J, Hutchison A, Payne R (2004) A comparison of bone tunnel measurements made using computed tomography and digital plain radiography after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 20:946–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xu Y, Ao Y, Wang J, Yu J, Cui G (2011) Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:923–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan HospitalUlsan UniversityGangneungRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUmraniye Training and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations