Advertisement

High risk of tunnel convergence during combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction

  • Kristof Smeets
  • J. Bellemans
  • G. Lamers
  • B. Valgaeren
  • L. Bruckers
  • E. Gielen
  • J. Vandevenne
  • F. Vandenabeele
  • J. Truijen
KNEE
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the risk of femoral tunnel convergence in combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructions. The hypothesis was that a more proximal and anterior orientation of the ALL femoral tunnel should reduce the risk of convergence with the ACL femoral tunnel.

Methods

15 fresh-frozen cadaver knees were examined. An anatomic ACL femoral tunnel was drilled arthroscopically in each specimen and ALL tunnels were made in two directions: (1) 0° coronal angulation and 20° axial angulation, (2) 30° coronal angulation and 30° axial angulation. Computed tomography scans were performed to investigate tunnel convergence and to measure the minimal distance between tunnels, tunnel length and the LFC width.

Results

Tunnel convergence occurred in 20 of 30 cases (67%). Convergence was significantly reduced when tunnels were drilled at 30° coronal and 30° axial angulation (p < 0.05). The mean length of the ALL tunnel was 15.9 mm [95% CI (13.6; 18.1)] and was independent of ALL tunnel angulation. The mean minimal distance between the ALL and ACL tunnel was 3.1 mm [95% CI (2.1; 4.1)]. The odds ratio for tunnel convergence was 3.5 for small LFC, relative to large LFC (n.s.)

Conclusion

A high risk of tunnel convergence was observed when performing combined ACL and ALL reconstructions. The clinical relevance of this work is that the occurrence of tunnel conflicts can be reduced by aiming the ALL tunnel in a more proximal and anterior direction. Surgeons should be aware of this, since tunnel convergence could jeopardize the ACL reconstruction and fixation.

Keywords

Knee Anterior cruciate ligament Anterolateral ligament Reconstruction Tunnel convergence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Senne Van de Bempt and Maarten Verheyden for their help with the drilling of femoral tunnels on human cadavers.

Funding

No funding was received.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

References

  1. 1.
    Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2008) Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26:342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caterine S, Litchfield R, Johnson M, Chronik B, Getgood A (2015) A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: re-introducing the lateral capsular ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3186–3195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chahla J, Menge TJ, Mitchell JJ, Dean CS, LaPrade RF (2016) Anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique: an anatomic-based approach. Arthrosc Tech 5:e453–e457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J (2013) Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat 223:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daggett M, Ockuly AC, Cullen M, Busch K, Lutz C, Imbert P, Sonnery-Cottet B (2016) Femoral origin of the anterolateral ligament: an anatomic analysis. Arthroscopy 32:835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engebretsen L, Lew WD, Lewis JL, Hunter RE (1990) The effect of an iliotibial tenodesis on intraarticular graft forces and knee joint motion. Am J Sports Med 18:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferreira Mde C, Zidan FF, Miduati FB, Fortuna CC, Mizutani BM, Abdalla RJ (2016) Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament using interlinked hamstrings—technical note. Rev Bras Ortop 51:466–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CA, Anderst W, Tashman S, Fu FH (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:1418–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gali JC, Bernardes Ade P, dos Santos LC, Ferreira TC, Almagro MA, da Silva PA (2016) Tunnel collision during simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gelber PE, Erquicia J, Abat F, Torres R, Pelfort X, Rodriguez-Baeza A, Alomar X, Monllau JC (2011) Effectiveness of a footprint guide to establish an anatomic femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: computed tomography evaluation in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 27:817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gelber PE, Erquicia JI, Sosa G, Ferrer G, Abat F, Rodriguez-Baeza A, Segura-Cros C, Monllau JC (2013) Femoral tunnel drilling angles for the posterolateral corner in multiligamentary knee reconstructions: computed tomography evaluation in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 29:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Getgood A, Brown C, Lording T, Amis A, Claes S, Geeslin A, Musahl V (2018) The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5072-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helito CP, Bonadio MB, Gobbi RG, da Mota EARF, Pecora JR, Camanho GL, Demange MK (2015) combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: the reconstruction of the knee anterolateral ligament. Arthrosc Tech 4:e239–e244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herbst E, Arilla FV, Guenther D, Yacuzzi C, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Fu FH, Debski RE, Musahl V (2017) Lateral extra-articular tenodesis has no effect in knees with isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.258 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karikis I, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L, Kartus J (2016) Comparison of anatomic double- and single-bundle techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts: a prospective randomized study with 5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Am J Sports Med 44:1225–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katakura M, Koga H, Nakamura K, Sekiya I, Muneta T (2016) Effects of different femoral tunnel positions on tension changes in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4178-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kernkamp WA, van de Velde SK, Bakker EW, van Arkel ER (2015) Anterolateral extra-articular soft tissue reconstruction in anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee. Arthrosc Tech 4:e863–e867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kittl C, El-Daou H, Athwal KK, Gupte CM, Weiler A, Williams A, Amis AA (2016) The role of the anterolateral structures and the ACL in controlling laxity of the intact and ACL-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 44:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kraeutler MJ, Welton KL, Chahla J, LaPrade RF, McCarty EC (2017) Current concepts of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: anatomy, biomechanics, and reconstruction. Am J Sports Med.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517701920:363546517701920 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L, Esterberg JL, Tso A (2004) An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 32:1405–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT (2013) Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med 41:2090–2098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M, Tanaka MJ, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr, Paletta GA Jr (2014) Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med 42:2363–2370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Middleton KK, Hamilton T, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Harner CD, Fu FH (2014) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1467–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moatshe G, Brady AW, Slette EL, Chahla J, Turnbull TL, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2017) Multiple ligament reconstruction femoral tunnels: intertunnel relationships and guidelines to avoid convergence. Am J Sports Med 45:563–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH (2005) Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med 33:712–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nitri M, Rasmussen MT, Williams BT, Moulton SG, Cruz RS, Dornan GJ, Goldsmith MT, LaPrade RF (2016) An in vitro robotic assessment of the anterolateral ligament, part 2: anterolateral ligament reconstruction combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saithna A, Thaunat M, Delaloye JR, Ouanezar H, Fayard JM, Sonnery-Cottet B (2018) Combined ACL and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 8:e2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schon JM, Moatshe G, Brady AW, Serra Cruz R, Chahla J, Dornan GJ, Turnbull TL, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2016) Anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction of the knee leads to overconstraint at any fixation angle. Am J Sports Med 44(10):2546–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT (2004) The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 20:294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shuler MS, Jasper LE, Rauh PB, Mulligan ME, Moorman CT (2006) Tunnel convergence in combined anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith JO, Yasen SK, Lord B, Wilson AJ (2015) Combined anterolateral ligament and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3151–3156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Barbosa NC, Tuteja S, Daggett M, Kajetanek C, Thaunat M (2016) minimally invasive anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthrosc Tech 5:e211–e215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, Monaco E, de Padua VB, Thaunat M, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Zijl J, Claes S (2017) Anterolateral ligament expert group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament—deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0449-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Lutz C, Daggett M, Dalmay F, Freychet B, Niglis L, Imbert P (2016) The involvement of the anterolateral ligament in rotational control of the knee. Am J Sports Med 44:1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Blakeney WG, Ouanezar H, Borade A, Daggett M, Thaunat M, Fayard JM, Delaloye JR (2018) Anterolateral ligament reconstruction protects the repaired medial meniscus: a comparative study of 383 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the SANTI study group with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Am J Sports Med 46:1819–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Cavalier M, Kajetanek C, Temponi EF, Daggett M, Helito CP, Thaunat M (2017) Anterolateral ligament reconstruction is associated with significantly reduced ACL graft rupture rates at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: a prospective comparative study of 502 patients from the SANTI study group. Am J Sports Med 45:1547–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S (2015) Outcome of a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 43:1598–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spencer L, Burkhart TA, Tran MN, Rezansoff AJ, Deo S, Caterine S, Getgood AM (2015) Biomechanical analysis of simulated clinical testing and reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med 43:2189–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suomalainen P, Jarvela T, Paakkala A, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2012) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 5-year results. Am J Sports Med 40:1511–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thein R, Boorman-Padgett J, Stone K, Wickiewicz TL, Imhauser CW, Pearle AD (2016) Biomechanical assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: a secondary restraint in simulated tests of the pivot shift and of anterior stability. J Bone Jt Surg Am 98:937–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Waller A, Linklater J, Roe JP, Pinczewski LA (2016) Twenty-year outcome of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med 44:3083–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tibor L, Chan PH, Funahashi TT, Wyatt R, Maletis GB, Inacio MC (2016) Surgical technique trends in primary ACL reconstruction from 2007 to 2014. J Bone Jt Surg Am 98:1079–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vundelinckx B, Herman B, Getgood A, Litchfield R (2017) Surgical indications and technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 36:135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wagih AM, Elguindy AM (2016) Percutaneous reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament of the knee with a polyester tape. Arthrosc Tech 5:e691–e697CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Doctoral School for Medicine and Life SciencesHasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryZiekenhuis Oost-LimburgGenkBelgium
  3. 3.Faculty of Medicine and Life SciencesHasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium
  4. 4.I-BioStat, Hasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyZiekenhuis Oost-LimburgGenkBelgium

Personalised recommendations