Advertisement

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 1385–1393 | Cite as

Major functional deficits persist 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture

  • Nicklas Olsson
  • Katarina Nilsson-Helander
  • Jón Karlsson
  • Bengt I. Eriksson
  • Roland Thomée
  • Eva Faxén
  • Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Ankle

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate the long-term results after an acute Achilles tendon rupture in patients treated surgically or non-surgically. The focus was to evaluate whether any improvements occurred between the one and 2-year evaluation.

Method

Eighty-one patients (67 men, 14 women) with a mean (SD) age of 42 (9.1) were included in this study. Forty-two patients were treated surgically, and 39 treated non-surgically otherwise the treatment was identical for the two groups. All patients were evaluated using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the Physical Activity Scale (PAS) and validated functional tests one and 2 years after injury.

Results

There were significant functional deficits on the injured side compared with the contralateral side 2 years after Achilles tendon rupture, regardless of treatment. Only minor improvements, even though statistically significant, occurred between the 1- and 2-year evaluations. The physical activity level remained significantly reduced as compared with prior to injury, but the ATRS mean was relatively high in both groups (89 and 90).

Conclusion

This long-term follow-up indicates that the majority of patients with an Achilles tendon rupture have not fully recovered (in regards to symptoms, physical activity level and function) 2 years after injury regardless of surgical or non-surgical treatment. Furthermore, only minor improvements occur between the 1- and 2-year evaluations. This indicates that to enhance the final outcome the focus should be on improvements in treatment within the first year. The patients appear to have adjusted to their impairments since the patient-reported outcome is relatively high in spite of functional deficits and lower activity level compared with pre-injury.

Level of evidence

Prospective randomized study, Level I.

Keywords

Achilles tendon rupture Long-term results Functional tests Heel-rise work Patient-reported outcome ATRS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Lotta Falkheden-Henning and Annelie Brorsson for their help treating and evaluating the patients. We would also thank Toran MacLeod for manuscript review. This study was supported by the Swedish National Centre for Research and Sports (CIF).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W (1990) Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:204–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F, Morrow F, Busse J, Leighton RK, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 400:190–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bostick GP, Jomha NM, Suchak AA, Beaupre LA (2010) Factors associated with calf muscle endurance recovery 1 year after achilles tendon rupture repair. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40(6):345–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitzgerald GK, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2000) A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(2):76–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grimby G (1986) Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Scand Suppl 711:233–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gustavsson A, Neeter C, Thomee P, Gravare Silbernagel K, Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J (2006) A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(8):778–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kangas J, Pajala A, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J (2007) Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. Am J Sports Med 35(1):59–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kangas J, Pajala A, Siira P, Hamalainen M, Leppilahti J (2003) Early functional treatment versus early immobilization in tension of the musculotendinous unit after Achilles rupture repair: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. J Trauma 54(6):1171–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerkhoffs GM, Struijs PA, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK (2002) Functional treatment after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: wrap vs walking cast. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122(2):102–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M (2005) Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2202–2210Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kocher MS, Bishop J, Marshall R, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ (2002) Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: expected-value decision analysis. Am J Sports Med 30(6):783–790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maffulli N, Tallon C, Wong J, Lim KP, Bleakney R (2003) Early weightbearing and ankle mobilization after open repair of acute midsubstance tears of the achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med 31(5):692–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metz R, Verleisdonk EJ, van der Heijden GJ, Clevers GJ, Hammacher ER, Verhofstad MH, van der Werken C (2008) Acute Achilles tendon rupture: minimally invasive surgery versus nonoperative treatment with immediate full weightbearing–a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 36(9):1688–1694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Clements KE, Zeni JA, Jr., Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2010) Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments a longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty, PMCID 3008304Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moller M, Lind K, Movin T, Karlsson J (2002) Calf muscle function after Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective, randomised study comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12(1):9–16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moller M, Movin T, Granhed H, Lind K, Faxen E, Karlsson J (2001) Acute rupture of tendon Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(6):843–848Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mortensen HM, Skov O, Jensen PE (1999) Early motion of the ankle after operative treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon. A prospective, randomized clinical and radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(7):983–990Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mortensen NH, Saether J, Steinke MS, Staehr H, Mikkelsen SS (1992) Separation of tendon ends after Achilles tendon repair: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Orthopedics 15(8):899–903PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Möller M, Movin T, Granhed H, Lind K, Faxen E, Karlsson J (2001) Acute rupture of tendon Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(6):843–848Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neumayer F, Mouhsine E, Arlettaz Y, Gremion G, Wettstein M, Crevoisier X (2009) A new conservative-dynamic treatment for the acute ruptured Achilles tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(3):363–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nilsson-Helander K (2008) A new surgical method to treat chronic ruptures and reruptures of the Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(6):614–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nilsson-Helander K, Silbernagel KG, Thomee R, Faxen E, Olsson N, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2010) Acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures. Am J Sports Med 38(11):2186–2193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nilsson-Helander K, Thomee R, Gravare-Silbernagel K, Thomee P, Faxen E, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2007) The Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med 35(3):421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nistor L (1981) Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles Tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63(3):394–399Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nystrom B, Holmlund D (1983) Separation of tendon ends after suture of achilles tendon. Acta Orthop Scand 54(4):620–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parent E, Moffet H (2002) Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(1):70–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saltin B, Grimby G (1968) Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation 38(6):1104–1115Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schepull T, Kvist J, Andersson C, Aspenberg P (2007) Mechanical properties during healing of Achilles tendon ruptures to predict final outcome: a pilot Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis in 10 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silbernagel KG, Gustavsson A, Thomee R, Karlsson J (2006) Evaluation of lower leg function in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1207–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silbernagel KG, Nilsson-Helander K, Thomee R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2010) A new measurement of heel-rise endurance with the ability to detect functional deficits in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(2):258–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suchak AA, Bostick GP, Beaupre LA, Durand DC, Jomha NM (2008) The influence of early weight-bearing compared with non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):1876–1883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Twaddle BC, Poon P (2007) Early motion for Achilles tendon ruptures: is surgery important? A randomized, prospective study. Am J Sports Med 35(12):2033–2038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weber M, Niemann M, Lanz R, Muller T (2003) Nonoperative treatment of acute rupture of the achilles tendon: results of a new protocol and comparison with operative treatment. Am J Sports Med 31(5):685–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, Kean CO, Kirkley A (2010) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(17):2767–2775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wong J, Barrass V, Maffulli N (2002) Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med 30(4):565–575PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicklas Olsson
    • 1
  • Katarina Nilsson-Helander
    • 2
  • Jón Karlsson
    • 1
  • Bengt I. Eriksson
    • 1
  • Roland Thomée
    • 1
  • Eva Faxén
    • 1
  • Karin Grävare Silbernagel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University HospitalMölndalSweden
  2. 2.Department of OrthopedicsKungsbacka HospitalKungsbackaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Biomedical Engineering ResearchUniveristy of DelawareNewarkDelaware

Personalised recommendations