Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Pearlite revisited

  • 364 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Zener’s model of pearlite transformation in steels can be viewed as the prototype of many microstructure evolution models in materials science. It links principles of thermodynamics and kinetics to the scale of the microstructure. In addition it solves a very practical problem: How the hardness of steel is correlated to the conditions of processing. Although the model is well established since the 1950s, quantitative explanation of growth kinetics was missing until very recently. The present paper will shortly review the classical model of pearlite transformation. Zener’s conjecture of maximum entropy production will be annotated by modern theoretical and experimental considerations of a band of stable (sometimes oscillating) states around the state of maximum entropy production. Finally, an explanation of the growth kinetics observed in experiments is proposed based on diffusion fluxes driven by stress gradients due to large transformation strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Zener C.: Kinetics of the Decomposition of Austenite. Wiley, NY (1947)

  2. 2

    Hillert M.: The role of interfacial energy during solid state phase transformations. Jernkontorets Ann. 147, 757–789 (1957)

  3. 3

    Tiller, W.A.: Polyphase solidification. In: Liquid Metals and Solidification (ASM proceedings) p. 276 (1958)

  4. 4

    Karma A., Sarkissian A.: Morphological instabilities of lamellar eutectics. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 635 (1996)

  5. 5

    Nakajima K., Apel M., Steinbach I.: The role of carbon diffusion in ferrite on the kinetics of cooperative growth of pearlite: a multi-phase field study. Acta. Mater. 54, 3665–3672 (2006)

  6. 6

    Jackson K.A., Hunt J.D.: Lamellar and rod eutectic growth. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 236, 1129 (1966)

  7. 7

    Trivedi R., Mason J.T., Verhoeven J.D., Kurz W.: Eutectic spacing selection in lead-based alloy systems. Meter. Trans. A 22, 2523 (1991)

  8. 8

    Ginibre M., Akamatsu S., Faivre G.: Experimental determination of the stability diagram of a lamellar eutectic growth front. Phys. Rev. E 56(1), 780 (1997)

  9. 9

    Akamatsu S., Plapp M., Faivre G., Karma A.: Overstability of lamellar eutectic growth below the minimum-undercooling spacing. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 1815 (2004)

  10. 10

    Manneville P.: Dissipative Structures and Weak Turbulence. Academic Press, Boston (1990)

  11. 11

    Akamatsu S., Bottin-Rousseau S., Faivre G.: Experimental evidence for a zigzag bifurcation in bulk lamellar eutectic growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 175701 (2004)

  12. 12

    Parisi A., Plapp M.: Stability of lamellar eutectic growth. Acta Mater. 56, 1348 (2008)

  13. 13

    Parisi A., Plapp M.: Defects and multistability in eutectic solidification patterns. EPL 90, 26010 (2010)

  14. 14

    Walker H., Liu S., Lee J.H., Trivedi R.: Eutectic growth in three dimensions. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38A(7), 1417–1425 (2007)

  15. 15

    de Graef, M., Kraal, M.V., Hillert, M.: A modern 3-D view of an “Old” pearlite colony. JOM 58(12), pp. 25–28 (2006)

  16. 16

    28Mn6 steel Benteler Stahl/Rohr, “as cast” microstructure

  17. 17

    http://www.micress.de

  18. 18

    Steinbach I., Pezzolla F., Nestler B., Seeßelberg M., Prieler, R., Schmitz G.J., Rezende J.L.L.: A phase field concept for multiphase systems. Physica D 94, 135–147 (1996)

  19. 19

    Steinbach, I.: Phase-field models in materials science. Mod. Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 17, 073001 (2009)

  20. 20

    Frye J.H., Stansbury E.E., McElroy D.L.: Absolute rate theory applied to rate of growth of pearlite. Trans. AIME 197, 219–224 (1953)

  21. 21

    Brown D., Ridley N.: Kinetics of pearlite reaction in high-purity nickel eutectoid steels. J. Iron Steel Inst. 207, 1232–1240 (1969)

  22. 22

    Eshelby J.D.: The determination of the elastic field of an elipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 241, 376–396 (1957)

  23. 23

    Steinbach I., Apel M.: Multi phase field model for solid state transformation with elastic strain. Physica D 217, 153–160 (2006)

  24. 24

    Steinbach I.: Pattern formation in constraint dendritic growth with solutal buoyancy. Acta Mat. 57, 2640–2645 (2009)

  25. 25

    Steinbach I., Apel M.: The influence of lattice strain on pearlite formation in fe-c. Acta Mater. 55, 4817–4822 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ingo Steinbach.

Additional information

Communicated by Oliver Kastner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbach, I., Plapp, M. Pearlite revisited. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 24, 665–673 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-011-0204-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Phase transformation kinetics
  • Phase-field simulation
  • Diffusion
  • Eutectic/Eutectoid transformation