The overall layout optimization design of an orbital propellant depot involves the optimization of shape, size, and positions of propellant tanks in functional module and the optimization of positions of equipment in service module, with the aim of making the carrying capacity of propellant, dry/wet ratio, and mass properties meet the allowable values. To alleviate the difficulty in dealing with the overall optimization problems involving two modules of the orbital propellant depot, a step-by-step modeling and solving strategy is presented. Two multi-objective optimization mathematical models for the tanks in functional module (model I) and the equipment in service module (model II) are constructed separately, which are solved one after another. In the solution process of the two models, model I is solved firstly and the obtained optimization solution is transmitted to model II as a known condition. We mainly focus on the layout optimization of equipment in the service module and give a batch component assignment and layout integration optimization method. In the proposed method, all the components are grouped firstly according to the functional subsystem, and then the obtained component groups are sorted in descending order of their feature values. Finally, the sorted component groups are added into the service module one by one for both assignment optimization and layout optimization. The computational results of the case study show that the obtained Pareto solutions meet the given allowable values of carrying capacity of propellant, dry/wet ratio, and mass properties of the orbital propellant depot.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Arney D, Wilhite A (2010) Orbital propellant depots enabling lunar architectures without heavy-lift launch vehicles. J Spacecr Rocket 47:353–360
Chai PR, Wilhite AW (2014) Cryogenic thermal system analysis for orbital propellant depot. Acta Astronaut 102:35–46
Chen X, Yao W, Zhao Y, Chen X, Zheng X (2018) A practical satellite layout optimization design approach based on enhanced finite-circle method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:2635–2653
Cuco APC, de Sousa FL, Neto AJS (2015) A multi-objective methodology for spacecraft equipment layouts. Optim Eng 16:165–181
Cui F-Z, Xu Z-Z, Wang X-K, Zhong C-Q, Teng H-F (2018) A dual-system cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm for satellite equipment layout optimization. Proc Inst Mech Eng G-J Aerosp Eng 232:2432–2457
De Sousa FL, Muraoka I, Galski RL (2007) On the optimal positioning of electronic equipment in space platforms. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (CDROM), Brasilia, Brasil
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197
Fakoor M, Taghinezhad M (2016) Layout and configuration design for a satellite with variable mass using hybrid optimization method. Proc Inst Mech Eng G-J Aerosp Eng 230:360–377
Fakoor M, Ghoreishi SMN, Sabaghzadeh H (2016) Spacecraft component adaptive layout environment (SCALE): an efficient optimization tool. Adv Space Res 58:1654–1670
Fakoor M, Mohammad Zadeh P, Momeni Eskandari H (2017) Developing an optimal layout design of a satellite system by considering natural frequency and attitude control constraints. Aerosp Sci Technol 71:172–188
Ferebee MJ, Allen CL (1991) Optimization of payload placement on arbitrary spacecraft. J Spacecr Rocket 28:612–614
Ferebee MJ Jr, Powers RB (1987) Optimization of payload mass placement in a dual keel space station. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton
Fortescue P, Swinerd G, Stark J (2011) Spacecraft systems engineering. Wiley, Hoboken
Grignon PM, Fadel GM (2004) A GA based configuration design optimization method. J Mech Des 126:6–15
Hengeveld DW, Braun JE, Groll EA, Williams AD (2011) Optimal placement of electronic components to minimize heat flux nonuniformities. J Spacecr Rocket 48:556–563
Huo J-Z, Teng H-F (2009) Optimal layout design of a satellite module using a coevolutionary method with heuristic rules. J Aerosp Eng 22:101–111
Huo J-Z, Teng H-F, Sun W, Chen J (2010) Human-computer co-operative co-evolution- ary method and its application to a satellite module layout design problem. Aeronaut J 114:209–223
Lau V, de Sousa FL, Galski RL, Rocco EM, Becceneri JC, Santos WA, Sandri SA (2014) A multidisciplinary design optimization tool for spacecraft equipment layout conception. J Aerosp Technol Manag 6:431–446
McLean C, Pitchford B, Mustafi S, Wollen M, Walls L, Schmidt J (2011) Simple, robust cryogenic propellant depot for near term applications. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT
Morgan L (1965) Orbital tanker designs and operational modes for orbit launch programs. In: AIAA 2nd Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California
Potter MA, De Jong KA (1994) A cooperative coevolutiouary approach to function optimization. In: Davidor Y, Schwefel HP, Manner R (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature - PPSN III - international conference on evolutionary computation, Proceedings, Jerusalem
Qian Z-Q, Bi Z-M, Cao Q, Ju W-G, Teng H-F, Zheng Y, Zheng S-Y (2017) Expert-guided evolutionary algorithm for layout design of complex space stations. Enterp Inf Syst 11:1078–1093
Qin Z, Liang YG (2017) Layout optimization of satellite cabin considering space debris impact risk. J Spacecr Rocket 54:1178–1182
Qin Z, Liang Y-G, Zhou J-P (2017) Multiobjective methodology for satellite cabin layout optimization considering space debris impact risk. J Spacecr Rocket 55:232–235
Qin Z, Liang YG, Zhou JP (2018) An optimization tool for satellite equipment layout. Adv Space Res 61:223–234
Shafaee M, Mohammadzadeh P, Elkaie A, Abbasi S (2017) Layout design optimization of a space propulsion system using hybrid optimization algorithm. Proc Inst Mech Eng G-J Aerosp Eng 231:338–349
Street D, Wilhite A (2006) A scalable orbital propellant depot design. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Sun Z-G, Teng H-F (2003) Optimal layout design of a satellite module. Eng Optim 35:513–529
Teng H-F, Sun S-L, Liu D-Q, Li Y-Z (2001) Layout optimization for the objects located within a rotating vessel — a three- dimensional packing problem with behavioral constraints. Comput Oper Res 28:521–535
Teng H-F, Chen Y, Zeng W, Shi Y-J, Hu Q-H (2010) A dual-system variable-grain cooperative coevolutionary algorithm: satellite-module layout design. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 14:438–455
Wang Y-S, Teng H-F (2009) Knowledge fusion design method: satellite module layout. Chin J Aeronaut 22:32–42
Xu Z-Z, Zhong C-Q, Teng H-F (2017) Assignment and layout integration optimization for simplified satellite re-entry module component layout. Proc Inst Mech Eng G-J Aerosp Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017704220
Zhang B, Teng H-F, Shi Y-J (2008) Layout optimization of satellite module using soft computing techniques. Appl Soft Comput 8:507–521
Zhang Z-H, Zhong C-Q, Xu Z-Z, Teng H-F (2017) A non-dominated sorting cooperative co-evolutionary differential evolution algorithm for multi-objective layout optimization. IEEE Access 5:14468–14477
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Responsible Editor: Helder C. Rodrigues
Electronic supplementary material
Appendix 1. Mass properties calculation.
Moment of inertia
For cylinder component:
For cuboid component:
For hemisphere component:
For component i, (xi, yi, zi) is the center of mass; αi is the arrangement angle; ai, bi, and hi denote the length, width, and height, respectively. (xm, ym, zm) is the calculated center of mass for the whole orbital propellant depot. ri denotes the radius of a cylinder or sphere component.
Center of mass
Angle of inertia
Product of inertia
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Z., Jiang, F., Zhong, C. et al. Multi-objective layout optimization for an orbital propellant depot. Struct Multidisc Optim 61, 207–223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02354-z
- Component assignment
- Component layout
- Multi-objective optimization
- Orbital propellant depot