Design of compliant revolute joints based on mechanism stiffness matrix through topology optimization using a parameterization level set method
- 156 Downloads
The main difficulties for designing compliant revolute joints include controlling the rotational angle with high precision and realizing a larger rotational angle range. Aiming at these two critical issues, this article presents an approach for designing compliant revolute joints based on a mechanism stiffness matrix using structural topology optimization. The compliant revolute joint is modeled as a kinetoelastic model considering the kinematic properties and structural elastic properties simultaneously. Thus, a mechanism stiffness matrix is established to synthetically describe the kinematic and elastic characteristics of a compliant revolute joint. Meanwhile, the topology optimization formulation is defined as an eigensystem optimization problem of the mechanism stiffness matrix. The parameterization level set method-based structural optimization is implemented with the finite element method, and shape sensitivity analysis is stated for this optimization problem. Numerical examples of compliant revolute joint design by topology optimization in two-dimension (2D) are investigated as a benchmark test for the proposed method and the influence of parameters is researched and discussed. Additionally, the guidance for parameter selection in this topology optimization problem is provided. The results indicate that the proposed kinetoelastic approach can be an effective method for designing compliant revolute joints through structural topology optimization.
KeywordsCompliant revolute joint Kinetoelastic model Mechanism stiffness matrix Topology optimization Eigensystem optimization A parameterization level set method
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51405280, 51575328).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Chen S (2008) Compliant Mechanisms with Distributed Compliance and Characteristic Stiffness: A Level Set Approach. PhD Thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
- Chen S, Wang M (2007) Designing distributed compliant mechanisms with characteristic stiffness. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, vol 8, pp 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2007-34437
- Hinkley D, Simburger E (2001) A multifunctional flexure hinge for deploying omnidirectional solar arrays. In: Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Seattle, pp 586–593. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-1260
- Howell L (2001) Compliant Mechanisms. Wiley-interscience Publication, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jin M, Zhang X (2016) A new topology optimization method for planar compliant parallel mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory 95:42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.08.016 Google Scholar
- Lu K, Kota S (2002) Compliant mechanism synthesis for shape-change applications: preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Modeling, Signal Processing, and Control, vol 4693, pp 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.475218
- Onillon E, Henein S, Theurillat P (2003) Small scanning mirror mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Japan, vol 2, pp 1129–1133. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2003.1225501
- Paros1 J, Weiabord L (1965) How to design flexure hinges. Mach Des 37(1):151–156Google Scholar
- Slocum A (1992) Precision machine design. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, MichiganGoogle Scholar
- Uicker J, Pennock G, Shigley J, Mccarthy J (2003) Theory of machines and mechanisms. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar