Advertisement

Self-supporting structure design for additive manufacturing by using a logistic aggregate function

  • Yu-Hsin Kuo
  • Chih-Chun ChengEmail author
Research Paper
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

Self-supporting designs that eliminate the need for structural supports can reduce manufacturing complexity caused by overhanging parts in additive manufacturing (AM). Traditionally, 45° is the minimum overhang angle required to ensure that designs can be manufactured without requiring any supporting structure. In this paper, a new self-supporting design method of AM based on topology optimization with overhang angle constraint is proposed. A self-supporting index established using a continuous logistic aggregate function is introduced to assess the supporting status of the specimen for AM process. This proposed self-supporting index is continuous and can be directly differentiated for sensitivity analysis without further mathematical transformations in the optimization formulation. Furthermore, it can be easily extended to a high-dimension aggregate (i.e., it can easily adapt to different overhang angles or self-supporting design domains). Numerical and fused deposition modeling (FDM) of a cantilever and MBB beam reveal that the self-supporting design can satisfy either general overhang angles or arbitrary orientation of AM deposition direction.

Keywords

Topology optimization Overhang angle Support-free Manufacturing constraint Design for manufacturability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Krister Svanberg for use of the GCMMA optimizer.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC, under contract no. MOST 106-2622-E-194-003-CC2 and MOST 107-2634-F-194-001.

References

  1. AM-Platform (2014) Additive manufacturing: strategic research agenda (release 2014). European technology sub-platform in additive manufacturingGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng L, Zhang P, Biyikli E, Bai J, Robbins J, To A (2017) Efficient design optimization of variable-density cellular structures for additive manufacturing: theory and experimental validation. Rapid Prototyp J 23(4):660–677.  https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crucible Design Ltd. (2015) Design guidelines for direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). Crucible Design Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. EOS GmbH Application Notes:Design Rules for DMLS. EOS GmbHGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo X, Zhou J, Zhang W, Du Z, Liu C, Liu Y (2017) Self-supporting structure design in additive manufacturing through explicit topology optimization. Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 323:27–63MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaynor AT, Guest JK (2016) Topology optimization considering overhang constraints: eliminating sacrificial support material in additive manufacturing through design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54:1157–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1551-x MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang Y, Leu MC, Mazumder J, Donmez A (2015) Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendations. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 137(1):014001.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuo YH, Cheng CC, Lin YS, San CH (2018) Support structure design in additive manufacturing based on topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):183–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1743-z MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Mazur M, Brandt M (2014) Optimal topology for additive manufacture: a method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Mater Des 63:678–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langelaar M (2016) Topology optimization of 3D self-supporting structures for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 12:60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langelaar M (2017) An additive manufacturing filter for topology optimization of print-ready designs. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:871.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1522-2 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li D, Dai N, Zhou X, Huang R, Liao W (2018) Self-supporting interior structures modeling for buoyancy optimization of computational fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(1–4):825–834.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1261-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirzendehdel AM, Suresh K (2016) Support structure constrained topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Design 81:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Panesar A, Abdi M, Hickman D, Ashcroft I (2018) Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 19:81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petersson J, Sigmund O (1998) Slope constrained topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 41:1417–1434MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Qian X (2017) Undercut and overhang angle control in topology optimization: a density gradient based integral approach. Int J Numer Methods Eng 111(3):247–272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5461 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stratasys Ltd. (2018) Design considerations for FDM additive manufacturing tooling. Stratasys Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM, Evans KE (2013) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1247–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4403-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(4):401–424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ultimaker BV (2018) How to design for FFF 3D printing. Ultimaker B.VGoogle Scholar
  22. van de Ven E, Maas R, Ayas C, Langelaar M, van Keulen F (2018) Continuous front propagation-based overhang control for topology optimization with additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(5):2075–2091.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1880-4 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vanek J, Galicia JAG, Benes B (2014) Clever support: efficient support structure generation for digital fabrication. Eurogr Symp Geometry Process 33:117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12437 Google Scholar
  24. Wang W, Qian S, Lin L, Li B, Yin B, Liu L, Liu X (2017) Support-free frame structures. Comput Graph 66:154–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2017.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang J, Dai J, Li KS, Wang J, Wei M, Pang M (2018) Cost-effective printing of 3D objects with self-supporting property. Vis Comput 1–13. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-018-1493-y
  26. Zhang W, Zhou L (2018) Topology optimization of self-supporting structures with polygon features for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:56–78MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao D, Li M, Liu Y (2017) Self-supporting topology optimization for additive manufacturing. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1708.07364Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with High-tech Innovations and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chung Cheng UniversityChiayiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations