Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Simultaneous design of non-Newtonian lubricant and surface texture using surrogate-based multiobjective optimization


Surface textures decrease friction in lubricated sliding with Newtonian fluids. Viscoelastic non-Newtonian lubricants can enhance frictional performance, but the optimal rheological material properties and their coupling to the texture design are non-obvious. In this study, we present a simultaneous design of both surface texture shape and non-Newtonian properties, which can be achieved by fluid additives that introduce viscoelasticity, shear thinning, and normal stress differences. Two models with different fidelity and computational cost are used to model laminar non-Newtonian fluid flow between a rotating flat plate and a textured disk. At lower fidelity, we use the Criminale-Ericksen-Filbey (CEF) constitutive model and a thin-film approximation for conservation of momentum (Reynolds equation). At higher fidelity, we use a fully nonlinear constitutive model typically applicable to polymer solutions (multimode Giesekus model) and the full 3-D momentum equations. Fluid additive design is parameterized by two relaxation modes each having a timescale, added viscosity, and a nonlinear anisotropic drag parameter. To manage the computational complexity and constraints between design variables, we use our previously developed multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling-based optimization (MO-ASMO) method. A new data-driven extension of MO-ASMO is introduced that constructs general boundaries to prevent attempts to evaluate designs that would lead to simulation failure. We demonstrate the efficiency of our MO-ASMO method and provide insights into co-designing the lubricant and textured surface. The Pareto-optimal solutions include fluid designs with both high and low viscoelastic additive loading. We rationalize this trade-off and discuss how the optimal design targets can be physically realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12


  1. Ashmore J, Shen A Q, Kavehpour H P, Stone H A, McKinley G H (2008) Coating flows of non-Newtonian fluids: weakly and strongly elastic limits. J Eng Math 60(1):17–41.

  2. Atalık K, Keunings R (2004) On the occurrence of even harmonics in the shear stress response of viscoelastic fluids in large amplitude oscillatory shear. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 122(1):107–116.

  3. Batra R L, Mohan V (1978) Roller bearing lubrication with shear thinning lubricants. Wear 51(2):213–225.

  4. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, vol 1 Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York. ISBN 978-0-471-80245-7

  5. Corman R E, Rao L, Bharadwaj N A, Allison J T, Ewoldt R H (2016) Setting material function design targets for linear viscoelastic materials and structures. J Mech Des 138(5):051402.

  6. Criminale WO Jr, Ericksen J L, Filbey GL Jr (1957) Steady shear flow of non-Newtonian fluids. Arch Ration Mech Anal 1(1):410–417.

  7. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197.

  8. Deshmukh A P, Allison J T (2016) Multidisciplinary dynamic optimization of horizontal axis wind turbine design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(1):15–27.

  9. Deville MO, Fischer PF, Mund EH (2002) High-order methods for incompressible fluid flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 978-0-521-45309-7

  10. Etsion I (2004) Improving tribological performance of mechanical components by laser surface texturing. Tribol Lett 17(4):733–737.

  11. Ewoldt R H (2014) Extremely soft: design with rheologically-complex fluids. Soft Robot 1(1):12–20.

  12. Fornberg B (2009) A practical guide to pseudospectral methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 978-0-511-62635-7.

  13. Freund J B, Ewoldt R H (2015) Quantitative rheological model selection: good fits versus credible models using Bayesian inference. J Rheol 59(3):667–701.

  14. Gropper D, Wang L, Harvey T J (2016) Hydrodynamic lubrication of textured surfaces: a review of modeling techniques and key findings. Tribol Int 94:509–529.

  15. Hamilton D B, Walowit J A, AC M (1966) A theory of lubrication by microirregularities. J Basic Eng 88(1):177–185.

  16. Heath MT (2002) Scientific computing: an introductory survey, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York. ISBN 978-0-07-239910-3

  17. Herber D R, Allison J T (2019) Nested and simultaneous solution strategies for general combined plant and control design problems. J Mech Des 141(1):011402.

  18. Hirani H, Athre K, Biswas S (2008) Lubricant shear thinning analysis of engine journal bearings. Tribol Trans 44(1):125–131.

  19. Huggins M L (1942) The viscosity of dilute solutions of long-chain molecules. IV. Dependence on concentration. J Am Chem Soc 64(11):2716–2718.

  20. Johnston M T, King W P, Ewoldt R H (2015) Shear stress characteristics of microtextured surfaces in gap-controlled hydrodynamic lubrication. Tribol Int 82:123–132.

  21. Keunings R (2000) A survey of computational rheology. In: Proceedings of the XIIIth international congress on rheology, pp 7–14

  22. Kopriva DA (2009) Implementing spectral methods for partial differential equations. Springer, Netherlands, ISBN 978-90-481-2260-8.

  23. Lee YH, Corman RE, Ewoldt RH, Allison JT (2017a) A multiobjective adaptive surrogate modeling-based optimization (MO-ASMO) framework using efficient sampling strategies. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2017 IDETC/CIE conference., vol 2B. 43rd Design Automation Conference, DETC2017-67541, Cleveland, p V02BT03A023

  24. Lee YH, Schuh JK, Ewoldt RH, Allison JT (2017b) Enhancing full-film lubrication performance via arbitrary surface texture design. J Mech Des 139 (5):053401–1–13.

  25. Lin C, Lee YH, Schuh JK, Ewoldt RH, Allison JT (2018) Efficient optimal surface texture design using linearization. In: Schumacher A, Vietor T, Fiebig S, Bletzinger KU, Maute K (eds) Advances in structural and multidisciplinary optimization: Proceedings of the 12th world congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization (WCSMO12). Springer, Cham, pp 632–647

  26. Macosko CW (1994) Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications. Wiley, New York. ISBN 978-0-471-18575-8

  27. Malak RJ Jr, Paredis C J J (2010) Using support vector machines to formalize the valid input domain of predictive models in systems design problems. J Mech Des 132(10):101001.

  28. Nelson A Z, Ewoldt R H (2017) Design of yield-stress fluids: a rheology-to-structure inverse problem. Soft Matter 13(41):7578–7594.

  29. Oldroyd J G (1950) On the formulation of rheological equations of state. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 200(1063):523–541.

  30. Owens RG, Phillips TN (2002) Computational rheology. Imperial College Press, London. ISBN 978-1-86094-186-3

  31. Pettersson U, Jacobson S (2003) Influence of surface texture on boundary lubricated sliding contacts. Tribol Int 36(11):857–864.

  32. Reynolds O (1886) On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 177:157–234.

  33. Schuh JK (2015a) Surface textures and non-Newtonian fluids for decreased friction in full film lubrication. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  34. Schuh J K, Lee Y H, Allison J T, Ewoldt RH (2015b) Surface textures and non-Newtonian fluids for decreasing friction in lubricated sliding contact. In: 2015 fluid power innovation and research conference. Minneapolis, MN

  35. Schuh JK, Lee YH, Allison JT, Ewoldt RH (2017) Design-driven modeling of surface-textured full-film lubricated sliding: validation and rationale of nonstandard thrust observations. Tribol Lett 65(2):35–1–17.

  36. Schuh JK (2018) Co-design of surface textures and non-Newtonian fluids for decreased friction. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,

  37. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464.

  38. Shan S, Wang G G (2004) An efficient Pareto set identification approach for multiobjective optimization on black-box functions. J Mech Des 127(5):866–874.

  39. Steponaviĉè I, Shirazi-Manesh M, Hyndman RJ, Smith-Miles K, Villanova L (2016) On sampling methods for costly multiobjective black-box optimization. In: Advances in Stochastic and deterministic global optimization. Springer, Cham. ISBN 978-3-319-29975-4, pp 273–296.

  40. Suh N P, Mosleh M, Howard P S (1994) Control of friction. Wear 175(1-2):151–158.

  41. Tax D M, Duin R P (1999) Support vector domain description. Pattern Recogn Lett 20(11-13):1191–1199.

  42. Varenberg M, Halperin G, Etsion I (2002) Different aspects of the role of wear debris in fretting wear. Wear 252(11-12):902–910.

  43. Wakuda M, Yamauchi Y, Kanzaki S, Yasuda Y (2003) Effect of surface texturing on friction reduction between ceramic and steel materials under lubricated sliding contact. Wear 254(3–4):356–363.

  44. Wang G G, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380.

  45. Wilson B, Cappelleri D, Simpson TW, Frecker M (2001) Efficient Pareto frontier exploration using surrogate approximations. Optim Eng 2(1):31–50.

  46. Xiaodi L, Haosheng C, Darong C, Jiadao W (2009) Normal stress effects in journal bearing lubrication with maxwell fluid. In: Luo J, Meng Y, Shao T, Zhao Q (eds) Advanced tribology. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–234.

  47. Yu H, Wang X, Zhou F (2010) Geometric shape effects of surface texture on the generation of hydrodynamic pressure between conformal contacting surfaces. Tribol Lett 37(2):123–130.

Download references


This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1463203. The authors also gratefully acknowledge support from the Procter & Gamble Company.

Author information

Correspondence to Yong Hoon Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was presented in part at the AIAA SciTech Forum 2018, Kissimmee, FL, January 8-12, 2018. Y. H. Lee and J. K. Schuh contributed equally to this work.

Responsible Editor: Felipe A. C. Viana

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 588 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y.H., Schuh, J.K., Ewoldt, R.H. et al. Simultaneous design of non-Newtonian lubricant and surface texture using surrogate-based multiobjective optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 60, 99–116 (2019).

Download citation


  • Simultaneous co-design
  • Non-Newtonian lubricant
  • Nonlinear viscoelasticity
  • Surrogate-based optimization