Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 1163–1179 | Cite as

Extending SORA method for reliability-based design optimization using probability and convex set mixed models

  • Fangyi LiEmail author
  • Jie Liu
  • Guilin Wen
  • Jianhua Rong
Research Paper

Abstract

In many practical applications, probabilistic and bounded uncertainties often arise simultaneously, and these uncertainties can be described by using probability and convex set models. However, the computing cost becomes unacceptable when directly solving the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) problem with these uncertainties involved. To address this issue, in this study, a sequential sampling strategy by extending classical sequential optimization and reliability assessment (SORA) method for RBDO is developed. The proposed strategy can successively select sample points to update the surrogate model at each step of the optimization process. New samples for reliability constraints are mainly chosen from the local region around the approximate minimum performance target point (MPTP) and worst-case point (WCP). Typical design examples, including one engineering application, are investigated to demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.

Keywords

Reliability-based design optimization Kriging model Mixed uncertainty model Probability Convex set model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11302033, 11772070, 11672104), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control (20121105), and Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (17C0044).

References

  1. Au F, Cheng Y, Tham L, Zeng G (2003) Robust design of structures using convex models. Comput Struct 81(28):2611–2619Google Scholar
  2. Basudhar A, Missoum S (2008) Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines. Comput Struct 86(19–20):1904–1917Google Scholar
  3. Bect J, Ginsbourger D, Ling L (2012) Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure. Stat Comput 22(3):773–793MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Haim Y (1994) A non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 14(4):227–245Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Haim Y, Elishakoff I (1995) Discussion on: A non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct Saf 17(3):195–199Google Scholar
  6. Bichon BJ, Eldred MS, Swiler LP, Mahadevan S, McFarland JM (2008) Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions. AIAA J 46(10):2459–2468Google Scholar
  7. Chan KY, Papalambros PY, Skerlos SJ (2010) A method for reliability-based optimization with multiple non-normal stochastic parameters: a simplified airshed management study. Stoch Env Res Risk A 24(1):101–116Google Scholar
  8. Chen X, Hasselman TK, Neill DJ Reliability based structural design optimization for practical applications. In: Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 1997. p 2724–2732Google Scholar
  9. Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Li X, Li P (2014) A local adaptive sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using Kriging model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(3):401–416MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng G, Xu L, Jiang L (2006) A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability-based structural optimization. Comput Struct 84(21):1353–1367Google Scholar
  11. Cheng J, Li QS (2008) Reliability analysis of structures using artificial neural network based genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(45–48):3742–3750zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng X Robust reliability optimization of mechanical components using non-probabilistic interval model. In: Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design, 2009 CAID & CD 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on, 2009. IEEE, p 821–825Google Scholar
  13. Du X (2012) Reliability-based design optimization with dependent interval variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 91(2):218–228MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Du X, Chen W (2004) Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design. J Mech Des 126(2):225–233Google Scholar
  15. Du X, Sudjianto A, Huang B (2005) Reliability-based design with the mixture of random and interval variables. J Mech Des 127(6):1068–1076Google Scholar
  16. Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M (2011) AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation. Struct Saf 33(2):145–154Google Scholar
  17. Elishakoff I, Haftka RT, Fang J (1994) Structural design under bounded uncertainty—Optimization with anti-optimization. Comput Struct 53(6):1401–1405zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo J, Du X (2009) Reliability sensitivity analysis with random and interval variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78(13):1585–1617MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo S, Lu Z (2002) Hybrid probabilistic and non-probabilistic model of structural reliability. Chinese J Mech Strength 24(4):524–526Google Scholar
  20. Hu C, Youn BD Adaptive-Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Reliability Analysis and Design of Complex Engineering Systems. In: ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2009Google Scholar
  21. Hu Z, Du X (2015) A random field approach to reliability analysis with random and interval variables. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B. Mech Eng 1(4):041005Google Scholar
  22. Jiang C, Bi R, Lu G, Han X (2013) Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:83–98MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang C, Han X, Liu GP (2008) A sequential nonlinear interval number programming method for uncertain structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(49–50):4250–4265zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiang C, Han X, Lu G, Liu J, Zhang Z, Bai Y (2011a) Correlation analysis of non-probabilistic convex model and corresponding structural reliability technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(33):2528–2546zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang C, Li W, Han X, Liu L, Le P (2011b) Structural reliability analysis based on random distributions with interval parameters. Comput Struct 89(23):2292–2302Google Scholar
  26. Jones DR (1998) Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions. J Glob Optim 13(4):455–492MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang Z, Luo Y (2009) Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization of geometrically nonlinear structures using convex models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(41):3228–3238MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Kang Z, Luo Y (2010) Reliability-based structural optimization with probability and convex set hybrid models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(1):89–102MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim C, Choi KK (2008) Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Response Surface Method With Prediction Interval Estimation. J Mech Des 130(12):121401–121401–12Google Scholar
  30. Lee J, Song CY (2011) Role of conservative moving least squares methods in reliability based design optimization: a mathematical foundation. J Mech Des 133(12):121005Google Scholar
  31. Lee JO, Yang YS, Ruy WS (2002) A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Comput Struct 80(3–4):257–269Google Scholar
  32. Lee TH, Jung JJ (2008) A sampling technique enhancing accuracy and efficiency of metamodel-based RBDO: Constraint boundary sampling. Comput Struct 86(13):1463–1476Google Scholar
  33. Li X, Qiu H, Chen Z, Gao L, Shao X (2016) A local Kriging approximation method using MPP for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 162(C):102–115Google Scholar
  34. Liang J, Mourelatos ZP, Nikolaidis E (2007) A single-loop approach for system reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 129(12):1215–1224Google Scholar
  35. Liu P-L, Der Kiureghian A (1991) Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Struct Saf 9(3):161–177Google Scholar
  36. Liu J, Wen G (2018) Continuum topology optimization considering uncertainties in load locations based on the cloud model. Eng Optim 50(6):1041–1060Google Scholar
  37. Liu J, Wen G, Xie YM (2016) Layout optimization of continuum structures considering the probabilistic and fuzzy directional uncertainty of applied loads based on the cloud model. Struc Multidiscip Optim 53(1):81–100Google Scholar
  38. Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Søndergaard J (2002) A MATLAB Kriging toolbox. Technical University of Denmark. Kongens Lyngby. Technical Report No. IMM-TR-2002-12Google Scholar
  39. Luo Y, Kang Z, Li A (2009a) Structural reliability assessment based on probability and convex set mixed model. Comput Struct 87(21):1408–1415Google Scholar
  40. Luo Y, Kang Z, Luo Z, Li A (2009b) Continuum topology optimization with non-probabilistic reliability constraints based on multi-ellipsoid convex model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(3):297–310MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Morris MD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J Stat Plan Infer 43(3):381–402zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Most T, Knabe T (2010) Reliability analysis of the bearing failure problem considering uncertain stochastic parameters. Comput Geotech 37(3):299–310Google Scholar
  43. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product in Optimization Using Designed Experiments. J. WileyGoogle Scholar
  44. Penmetsa RC, Grandhi RV (2002) Efficient estimation of structural reliability for problems with uncertain intervals. Comput Struct 80(12):1103–1112Google Scholar
  45. Picheny V, Ginsbourger D, Roustant O, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2010) Adaptive Designs of Experiments for Accurate Approximation of Target Regions. J Mech Des 132(7):461–471Google Scholar
  46. Qiu Z, Elishakoff I (1998) Antioptimization of structures with large uncertain-but-non-random parameters via interval analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 152(3):361–372zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Qiu Z, Wang J (2010) The interval estimation of reliability for probabilistic and non-probabilistic hybrid structural system. Eng Fail Anal 17(5):1142–1154Google Scholar
  48. Sakata S, Ashida F, Zako M (2003) Structural optimization using Kriging approximation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(7):923–939zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233–2241Google Scholar
  50. Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564Google Scholar
  51. Wang J, Qiu Z (2010) The reliability analysis of probabilistic and interval hybrid structural system. Appl Math Model 34(11):3648–3658MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang L, Wang X, Wang R, Chen X (2016) Reliability-based design optimization under mixture of random, interval and convex uncertainties. Archive of Applied Mechanics:1–27Google Scholar
  53. Wang P, Hu C, Youn BD (2011) A generalized complementary intersection method (GCIM) for system reliability analysis. J Mech Des 133(7):071003Google Scholar
  54. Wang Z, Wang P (2013) A Maximum Confidence Enhancement Based Sequential Sampling Scheme for Simulation-Based Design. J Mech Des 136(2):021006Google Scholar
  55. Xia B, Lü H, Yu D, Jiang C (2015) Reliability-based design optimization of structural systems under hybrid probabilistic and interval model. Comput Struct 160:126–134Google Scholar
  56. Xiang Y, Wang Q, Fan Z, Fang H (2006) Optimal crashworthiness design of a spot-welded thin-walled hat section. Finite Elem Anal Des 42(10):846–855Google Scholar
  57. Yao W, Chen X, Huang Y, Gurdal Z, van Tooren M (2013) Sequential optimization and mixed uncertainty analysis method for reliability-based optimization. AIAA J 51(9):2266–2277Google Scholar
  58. Youn BD, Choi K, Du L (2005) Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(2):134–148Google Scholar
  59. Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82(2):241–256Google Scholar
  60. Youn BD, Xi Z, Wang P (2008) Eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method for sensitivity-free probability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(1):13–28MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhao L, Choi KK, Lee I (2011a) Metamodeling Method Using Dynamic Kriging for Design Optimization. AIAA J 49(9):2034–2046Google Scholar
  62. Zhao L, Choi KK, Lee I, Gorsich D (2011b) Conservative Surrogate Model Using Weighted Kriging Variance for Sampling-Based RBDO. J Mech Des 135(91003):1–10Google Scholar
  63. Zhao Z, Han X, Jiang C, Zhou X (2010) A nonlinear interval-based optimization method with local-densifying approximation technique. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(4):559–573Google Scholar
  64. Zhuang X, Pan R (2012) A sequential sampling strategy to improve reliability-based design optimization with implicit constraint functions. J Mech Des 134(2):021002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Automotive and Mechanical EngineeringChangsha University of Science and TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Electric EngineeringGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacture for Vehicle BodyHunan UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations