Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 521–538 | Cite as

Structural optimization with design constraints on peak responses to temporally correlated quasi-static load processes

  • Chien-Kai WangEmail author
  • Chang-Min Tsai
  • Bo-Sen Chuang
  • Yuan-Lung Lo
Research Paper
  • 124 Downloads

Abstract

Structural optimization has become a widely used tool for various applications due to its capability of providing design freedom and promise to efficient structures. Current optimization methods are usually utilized for producing optimal structural systems subjected to design constraints under definite static or dynamic load distributions. However, engineering structures may experience randomly fluctuating loads in different physical environments. In this paper, a methodology of structural optimization with constraints on peak system responses to temporally correlated quasi-static load processes is developed. The proposed methodology provides an algorithm for generating structures of the optimal designs with constraints on their extreme responses to such environmental load sequences which have correlation features in the time domain. The computational results confirm that material distributions of optimized structures with peak response constraints highly depend on correlation levels of quasi-static load distributions under stationary processes. Furthermore, conventional optimization of structures in statics with displacement constraints is also compared with the reported optimum material distributions with peak response constraints under correlated load sequences. In consequence, the developed methodology provides a powerful tool of structural designs under stationary processes of temporally correlated loads having very low frequencies for fundamental engineering structures and further multidisciplinary mechanics researches.

Keywords

Structural optimization Peak response constraints Stationary load processes Temporally correlated quasi-static loads Design sensitivity analysis 

Notes

Funding information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2218-E-032-004, 105-2221-E-032-006, 106-2221-E-032-018-MY2) and the visiting scholar program of the Academia Sinica.

References

  1. Arora JS, Wang Q (2005) Review of formulations for structural and mechanical system optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 30(4):251–272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0509-6 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A (2002) Robust optimization - methodology and applications. Math Program 92(3):453–480.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070100286 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrd RH, Hribar M, Nocedal J (1999) An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. SIAM J Appl Math 9(4):877–900.  https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623497325107 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrd RH, Gilbert JC, Nocedal J (2000) A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math Program Ser B 89 (1):149–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070000189 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi WS, Park GJ (1999) Transformation of dynamic loads into equivalent static loads based on modal analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(1):29–43.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<29::AID-NME661>3.0.CO;2-D zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi WS, Park GJ (2002) Structural optimization using equivalent static loads at all time intervals. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(19-20):2105–2122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00373-5 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Díaz AR (1992) Shape optimization of structures for multiple loading conditions using a homogenization method. Struct Optim 4(1):17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01894077 Google Scholar
  8. Farshi B, Alinia-Ziazi A (2010) Sizing optimization of truss structures by method of centers and force formulation. Int J Solids Struct 47(18–19):2508–2524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.009 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Guest JK, Igusa T (2008) Structural optimization under uncertain loads and nodal locations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):116–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.009 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Han SP (1977) A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming. J Optim Theory Appl 22(3):297–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932858 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang BS, Choi WS, Park GJ (2001) Structural optimization under equivalent static loads transformed from dynamic loads based on displacement. Comput Struct 79(2):145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00127-9 Google Scholar
  12. Kanno Y, Takewaki I (2008) Semidefinite programming for uncertain linear equations in static analysis of structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):102–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.003 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasperski M (1992) Extreme wind load distributions for linear and nonlinear design. Eng Struct 14(1):27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(92)90005-B Google Scholar
  14. Kasperski M, Niemann HJ (1992) The L.R.C. (load-response-correlation) - method a general method of estimating unfavourable wind load distributions for linear and non-linear structural behaviour. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 43(1-3):1753–1763.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90588-2 Google Scholar
  15. Katsumura A, Tamura Y, Nakamura O (2007) Universal wind load distribution simultaneously reproducing largest load effects in all subject members on large-span cantilevered roof. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95(9-11):1145–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01.020 Google Scholar
  16. Keshavarzzadeh V, Meidani H, Tortorelli DA (2016) Gradient based design optimization under uncertainty via stochastic expansion methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 306:47–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.03.046 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Li LJ, Huang ZB, Liu F, Wu QH (2007) A heuristic particle swarm optimizer for optimization of pin connected structures. Comput Struct 85(7-8):340–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.020 Google Scholar
  18. Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ, Zenios S (1995) Robust optimization of Large-Scale systems. Oper Res 43(2):264–281.  https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.43.2.264 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Chu Nha D, Xie Y, Hira A, Steven G (1996) Evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints. Finite Elem Anal Des 21(4):239–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-874X(95)00043-S zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Repetto MP, Solari G (2004) Equivalent static wind actions on vertical structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92(5):335–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.002 Google Scholar
  21. Schuëller G I, Jensen HA (2008) Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties - an overview. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(1):2–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.004 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Spillers WR, MacBain KM (2009) Structural optimization. Springer US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95865-1
  23. Sudret B, Kiureghian AD (2002) Comparison of finite element reliability methods. Probab Engrg Mech 17:337–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(02)00031-0 Google Scholar
  24. Tamura Y, Fujii K, Ueda H (1992) Design wind loads for beams supporting flats roofs. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 44:1841–1852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90601-6 Google Scholar
  25. Da Tortorelli, Michaleris P (1994) Design sensitivity analysis: Overview and review. Inverse Probl Sci Eng 1(1):71–105.  https://doi.org/10.1080/174159794088027573 Google Scholar
  26. Waltz RA, Morales JL, Nocedal J, Orban D (2006) An interior algorithm for nonlinear optimization that combines line search and trust region steps. Math Program 107(3):391–408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0560-5 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang D, Zhang WH, Jiang JS (2002) Truss shape optimization with multiple displacement constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(33):3597–3612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00297-9 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang R, Chuang C (1994) Optimal topology design using linear programming. Comput Struct 52(2):265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90279-8 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou Y, Kareem A (2001) Gust loading factor: New model. J Struct Eng ASCE 127(2):168–175.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(168) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringTamkang UniversityNew TaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Research Center for Applied SciencesAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.School of Civil, Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Applied MechanicsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations