Advertisement

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 249–262 | Cite as

Topology optimization of shell-infill structures using a distance regularized parametric level-set method

  • Junjian Fu
  • Hao Li
  • Mi Xiao
  • Liang Gao
  • Sheng Chu
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper presents a novel topology optimization formulation for shell-infill structures based on a distance regularized parametric level-set method (PLSM). In this method, the outer shell and the infill are represented by two distinct level sets of a single-level set function (LSF). In order to obtain a controllable and uniform shell thickness, a distance regularization (DR) term is introduced to formulate a weighted bi-objective function. The DR term is minimized along with the original objective, regularizing the parametric LSF close to a signed distance function. With the signed distance property, the area between the two-level sets can be contoured as the shell with a uniform thickness. Additionally, the presented formulation retains one important merit of the PLSM that new holes are able to nucleate during the optimization process. With respect to the material of the shell, the infill is filled with a weaker and lighter material with tunable parameters. Particularly, the infill can be pre-designed with isotropic microstructures. Three compliance minimization examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of this formulation.

Keywords

Topology optimization Shell-infill structures Parametric level-set method Distance regularization 

Notes

Funding

This research is partially supported by National Basic Scientific Research Program of China (JCKY2016110C012), China Equipment Pre-research Program (41423010102), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705166, 51675196 and 51721092), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017 M612446), and Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team.

References

  1. Allaire G, Dapogny C, Delgado G, Michailidis G (2014) Multi-phase structural optimization via a level set method. ESAIM: Control Optim Calc Var 20(2):576–611MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194(1):363–393MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu S, Gao L, Xiao M, Luo Z, Li H, Gui X (2018) A new method based on adaptive volume constraint and stress penalty for stress-constrained topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(3):1163–1185MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clausen A, Aage N, Sigmund O (2015) Topology optimization of coated structures and material interface problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 290:524–541MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clausen A, Aage N, Sigmund O (2016) Exploiting additive manufacturing infill in topology optimization for improved buckling load. Engineering 2(2):250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clausen A, Andreassen E, Sigmund O (2017) Topology optimization of 3D shell structures with porous infill. Acta Mech Sinica 33(4):778–791MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunning PD, Kim HA (2015) Introducing the sequential linear programming level-set method for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(3):631–643MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faure A, Michailidis G, Parry G, Vermaak N, Estevez R (2017) Design of thermoelastic multi-material structures with graded interfaces using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 56(4):823–837MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao J, Li H, Gao L, Xiao M (2018) Topological shape optimization of 3D micro-structured materials using energy-based homogenization method. Adv Eng Softw 116:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W (2014) Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically—a new moving morphable components based framework. J Appl Mech 81(8):081009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11(2):127–140MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang L, Chen S (2017) Parametric structural shape & topology optimization with a variational distance-regularized level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:316–336MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang L, Chen S, Jiao X (2018) Parametric shape and topology optimization: a new level set approach based on cardinal basis functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 114(1):66–87MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD (2010) Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 19(12):3243–3254MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H, Luo Z, Gao L, Walker P (2018) Topology optimization for functionally graded cellular composites with metamaterials by level sets. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 328:340–364MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li H, Luo Z, Zhang N, Gao L, Brown T (2016) Integrated design of cellular composites using a level-set topology optimization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 309:453–475MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu P, Luo Y, Kang Z (2016) Multi-material topology optimization considering interface behavior via XFEM and level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 308:113–133MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo J, Luo Z, Chen L, Tong L, Wang MY (2008) A semi-implicit level set method for structural shape and topology optimization. J Comput Phys 227(11):5561–5581MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo Z, Tong L, Kang Z (2009a) A level set method for structural shape and topology optimization using radial basis functions. Comput Struct 87(7):425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo Z, Tong L, Ma H (2009b) Shape and topology optimization for electrothermomechanical microactuators using level set methods. J Comput Phys 228(9):3173–3181MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Osher SJ, Santosa F (2001) Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints: I. Frequencies of a two-density inhomogeneous drum. J Comput Phys 171(1):272–288MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osher S, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79(1):12–49MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sethian JA, Wiegmann A (2000) Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. J Comput Phys 163(2):489–528MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sigmund O (1994) Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: an inverse homogenization problem. Int J Solids Struct 31(17):2313–2329MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(6):1031–1055MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Dijk NP, Maute K, Langelaar M, Van Keulen F (2013) Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(3):437–472MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vermaak N, Michailidis G, Parry G, Estevez R, Allaire G, Bréchet Y (2014) Material interface effects on the topology optimizationof multi-phase structures using a level set method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50(4):623–644MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang MY, Wang X, Guo D (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(1):227–246MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Y, Kang Z (2018) A level set method for shape and topology optimization of coated structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 329:553–574MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Y, Luo Z, Zhang N, Kang Z (2014) Topological shape optimization of microstructural metamaterials using a level set method. Comput Mater Sci 87:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wendland H (2004) Scattered data approximation. Cambridge university pressGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu J, Aage N, Westermann R, Sigmund O (2018) Infill optimization for additive manufacturing—approaching bone-like porous structures. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 24(2):1127–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu J, Clausen A, Sigmund O (2017) Minimum compliance topology optimization of shell–infill composites for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 326:358–375MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia Q, Wang MY, Wang S, Chen S (2006) Semi-Lagrange method for level-set-based structural topology and shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 31(6):419–429MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu B, Zhang X, Fatikow S (2015) Structural topology and shape optimization using a level set method with distance-suppression scheme. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1214–1239MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and TechnologyHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations