Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 121–127 | Cite as

Reconsidering Buber, educational technology, and the expansion of dialogic space

  • Vikas BaniwalEmail author
Open Forum
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to further the conversation about the possibilities of dialogue with technology that Wegerif and Major (AI Soc,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6, 2018) have initiated. In their paper Wegerif and Major (AI Soc,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6, 2018) have argued that “constructive dialogue with technology is possible, even essential, and that this takes the form of opening a dialogic space” and they also “argue against Buber that dialogic spaces do not all take the same form, but that they take a multitude of forms depending, to a large extent, on the mediating technology”. Reflecting on the paper by Wegerif and Major (AI Soc,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6, 2018), the present paper attempts to highlight certain issues and possibilities for such a dialogue. In the first section of the paper, Wegerif and Major’s (AI Soc,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6, 2018) discussion of technology-mediated dialogue has been reflected upon. This is followed by a reflection on the possibility and challenges of engaging in a dialogue with technology as ‘other’ by referring to the case of a robot ‘Sophia’ getting citizenship in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The third section discusses certain concerns regarding the interpretation of Buber’s idea of dialogue by Wegerif and Major (AI Soc,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6, 2018). The conclusive section highlights some key aspects that need to be considered while reflecting on the possibility of dialogue with technology.

Keywords

Dialogue via technology Dialogue with technology Buber Dialogue Intersubjectivity 

References

  1. Abbass H (2017) An AI professor explains: three concerns about granting citizenship to robot Sophia. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/an-ai-professor-explains-three-concerns-about-granting-citizenship-to-robot-sophia-86479. Accessed on 01 May 18
  2. Barrett E (2017) World’s first robot citizen says she ‘deserves’ to have a family. Retrieved from http://vt.co/sci-tech/design/worlds-first-robot-citizen-says-deserves-family/. Accessed on 1 May 2018
  3. Bergman SH (2012) Dialogical philosophy from Kierkegaard to Buber. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  4. Buber M (2002) Between man and man, trans. Ronald Gregor Smith. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenstadt SN (1992) Introduction. Intersubjectivity, dialogue, discourse, and cultural creativity in the work of Martin Buber. In: Buber M (ed) On intersubjectivity and cultural creativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  6. Foster A ( 2017) World’s first robot ‘citizen’ says she wants to start a family. Retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/inventions/worlds-first-robot-citizen-says-she-wants-to-start-a-family/news-story/4c566043cb30f49cf118b8c26084d0de. Accessed on 01 May 18
  7. Gill KS (1996) The foundations of human-centred systems. In: Gill KS (ed) Human machine symbiosis. Springer, London, pp 1–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill KS (2017) Uncommon voices of AI. AI Soc 32(4):475–482.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0755-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology, and other essays. W Lovitt trans. Garland Publishing Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoover RC (2012) Buber’s way toward sustainable communitarian socialism. In: Friedman M (ed) Martin Buber and the human sciences. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 253–266Google Scholar
  11. Kajon I (2015) Religio today: the concept of religion in Martin Buber’s thought. In: Mendes-Flohr P (ed) Dialogue as a trans-disciplinary concept: Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue and its contemporary reception, vol 83. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co, Berlin, pp 101–112Google Scholar
  12. Kent ML, Taylor M (1998) Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relat Rev 24(3):321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mercer N (1995) The guided construction of knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters, BristolGoogle Scholar
  14. Nasir S (2017) Video: Sophia the robot wants to start a family. Retrieved from https://www.khaleejtimes.com/nation/dubai//video-sophia-the-robot-wants-to-start-a-family-Dubai. Accessed on 01 May 18
  15. Nelson ES (2014) Technology and the way: Buber, Heidegger, and Lao-Zhuang “Daoism”. J Chin Philos 41(3–4):307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pyra L (2012) Values within relations. In: Tymieniecka AT (ed) The origins of life: the origins of the existential sharing-in-life, vol 67. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–64Google Scholar
  17. Stiegler B (1998) Technics and time: the fault of Epimetheus, vol 1. Stanford University Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  18. Tegmark M (2017) Life 3.0: being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Turkle S (2017) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Hachette, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Vygotsky LS (1986) Thought and language. MIT press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Wegerif R (2010) Dialogue and teaching thinking with technology. In: Howe K, Littleton C (ed) Educational dialogues: understanding and promoting productive interaction. Routledge, London, pp 338–357Google Scholar
  22. Wegerif R (2013) Dialogic: education for the Internet age. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wegerif R, Major L (2018) Buber, educational technology, and the expansion of dialogic space. AI Soc  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0828-6 Google Scholar
  24. Wegerif R, Mercer N (1996) Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Lang Educ 10(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wood RE (1969) Martin Buber’s ontology: an analysis of I and thou. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations