Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 899–905 | Cite as

The HeartMath coherence model: implications and challenges for artificial intelligence and robotics

  • Stephen D. EdwardsEmail author
Open Forum

Abstract

HeartMath is a contemporary, scientific, coherent model of heart intelligence. The aim of this paper is to review this coherence model with special reference to its implications for artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. Various conceptual issues, implications and challenges for AI and robotics are discussed. In view of seemingly infinite human capacity for creative, destructive and incoherent behaviour, it is highly recommended that designers and operators be persons of heart intelligence, optimal moral integrity, vision and mission. This implies that AI and robotic design and production should be continuously optimized through vigilant and appropriate human and material quality control procedures. Evidence is provided for some value and effectiveness of the HeartMath coherence model in this context.

Keywords

HeartMath Coherence Artificial intelligence Robotics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is based on research supported by the University of Zululand and the South African National Research Foundation (NRF). Any opinion, finding and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s) and the NRF does not accept any liability in regard thereto.

References

  1. Alexander VK (2005) Applications of Maharishi vedic science to developmental psychology. J Soc Behav Pers 2005:9–20Google Scholar
  2. Bourgeault C (2016) The heart of centering prayer. Nondual Christianity in theory and practice. Shambala, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  3. Brass M et al (2013) Imaging volition: what the brain can tell us about the will. Exp Brain Res 229:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carkhuff RR (1969) Helping and human relations: a primer for lay and professional helpers. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Childre DL, Martin H (2000) The HeartMath solution. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Childre DL, Martin H, Rozman D, McCraty R (2016) Heart intelligence. Connecting with the intuitive guidance of the heart. Waterfront Press, HeartMathGoogle Scholar
  7. Ecker B, Hulley L (2015) Coherence therapy tool kit for focused, in-depth effectiveness (article originally published in New Therapist 20, 24–29 as DOBT tool kit for rapid in-depth effectiveness: methods and concepts of depth oriented brief therapy)Google Scholar
  8. Feldman R (2009) The development of regulatory functions from birth to 5 years: insights from premature infants. Child Dev 80(2):544–561.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01278.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner H (2011) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Horan R (2009) The neuropsychological connection between creativity and meditation. Creativity Res J 21:199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Institute of HeartMath (2014) Building personal resilience. a handbook for Heartmath certified coachers and mentors. Institute of HeartMath, Boulder CreekGoogle Scholar
  12. Khader S, Johnson K, Glicksberg B, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP (2018) Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? Heart.  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lama D, Tutu D, Abrams D (2016) The book of joy: lasting happiness in a changing world. Avery Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. László E (2007) Science and the akashic field: an integral theory of everything. Inner Traditions, Rochester, VTGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehrer P, Gevirtz R (2014) Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work? Front Psychol 5:756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leskowitz E (2008) The influence of group heart rhythm on target subject physiology: case report of a laboratory demonstration and suggestions for further research. Subtle Energies Energy Med 18(3):1–12Google Scholar
  17. Louchakova-Schwartz O (2013) The Hesychastic prayer of the heart: experience of praying and dense array encephalography. In: Congress Proceedings of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion, 27–30 August, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKinnon S, Gevirtz R, McCraty R, Brown M (2013) Utilizing heartbeat evoked potentials to identify cardiac regulation of vagal afferents during emotion and resonant breathing. Appl Physiol Biofeedback 38:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCraty R (2003) The energetic heart. Bioelectric interactions within and between people. HeartMath Research Centre, Institute of HeartMath, Boulder CreekGoogle Scholar
  20. McCraty R (2017) New frontiers in heart rate variability and social coherence research: techniques, technologies, and implications for improving group dynamics and outcomes. Front Public Health 5:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCraty R, Shaffer F (2015) Heart rate variability: new perspectives on physiological mechanisms, assessment of self-regulatory capacity, and health risk. Glob Adv Health Med 4(1):46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCraty R, Zayas MA (2014) Cardiac coherence, self-regulation, autonomic stability and psychosocial well-being. Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCraty R, Adkinson M, Tiller WA (1995) New electrophysiological correlates associated with intentional heart focus. Subtle Energies 4(3):251–262Google Scholar
  24. McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tomasino D, Bradley RJ (2009) The coherent heart. Heart-brain interaction, psychophysiological coherence and the emergence of a system wide order. Integral Rev 2:10–115Google Scholar
  25. Morris SM (2010) Achieving collective coherence: group effects on heart rate variability coherence and heart rhythm synchronization. Altern Ther Health Med 16(4):62–72Google Scholar
  26. Nelson R (2011) Detecting mass consciousness: effects of globally shared attention and emotion. J Cosmol 14(1):4616–4632Google Scholar
  27. Nidich SI, Nidich RJ, Alexander CN (2000) Moral development and higher states of consciousness. J Adult Dev 7(4):217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orme-Johnson DW (2000) An overview of Charles Alexander’s contribution to society: developing higher states of consciousness in the individual and society. J Adult Dev 7(4):199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pribram KH (2011) Brain and perception. Holonomy and structure in figural processing. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers C (1980) A way of being. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  31. Schultze-Krafta M et al. (2016). The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(4):1080–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz GE, Russek LG (1997) Dynamical energy systems and modern physics: Fostering the science and spirit of complementary and alternative medicine. Altern Ther Health Med 3(3):46–56Google Scholar
  33. Travis F, Munly K, Olson TM, Sorflaten JW (2005) Maharishi Vedic science addresses the “hard” problem of consciousness. J Soc Behav Pers 17:123–135Google Scholar
  34. Wilber K (2000) Integral psychology. Shambhala, BostonGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilber K (2006) Integral spirituality. Integral Books, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilber K (2016) Integral meditation. Shambhala, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZululandKwaDlangezwaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations