Towards a unified framework for developing ethical and practical Turing tests
Since Turing proposed the first test of intelligence, several modifications have been proposed with the aim of making Turing’s proposal more realistic and applicable in the search for artificial intelligence. In the modern context, it turns out that some of these definitions of intelligence and the corresponding tests merely measure computational power. Furthermore, in the framework of the original Turing test, for a system to prove itself to be intelligent, a certain amount of deceit is implicitly required which can have serious security implications for future human societies. In this article, we propose a unified framework for developing intelligence tests which takes care of important ethical and practical issues. Our proposed framework has several important consequences. Firstly, it results in the suggestion that it is not possible to construct a single, context independent, intelligence test. Secondly, any measure of intelligence must have access to the process by which a problem is solved by the system under consideration and not merely the final solution. Finally, it requires an intelligent agent to be evolutionary in nature with the flexibility to explore new algorithms on its own.
KeywordsArtificial intelligence Imitation game Turing test Machine ethics
The authors thank the anonymous reviewer for very useful comments. A part of this work was done, while the authors were at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, India.
- Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 elections. NBER working paper 23089Google Scholar
- Arleback JB, Bergsten C (2013) On the use of realistic fermi problems in introducing mathematical modelling in upper secondary mathematics. In: Lesh R, Galbraith P, Haines C, Hurford A (eds) Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies. International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Burgess A (2013) A clockwork orange. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Cohen PJ (2008) Set theory and the continuum hypothesis. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gardner H (2011) Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Levesque HJ, Davis E and Morgenstern L (2011) The Winograd schema challenge. In: AAAI Spring symposium: logical formalizations of commonsense reasoningGoogle Scholar
- Oppy G, Dowe D (2016) The Turing test, the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. In: Zalta EN (ed). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/turing-test/. Accessed 15 Aug 2017
- Tesla N (1937) A machine to end war, PBS.org. In: Viereck GS (ed). https://www.pbs.org/tesla/res/res_art11.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2017
- Wu Y et al (2016) Google’s neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv:1609.08144
- Warwick K, Shah H (2016d) Taking the fifth amendment in Turing’s imitation game. J Expt Theor AI 29:1Google Scholar