Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

From Alan Turing to modern AI: practical solutions and an implicit epistemic stance

Abstract

It has been just over 100 years since the birth of Alan Turing and more than 65 years since he published in Mind his seminal paper, Computing Machinery and Intelligence (Turing in Computing machinery and intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1950). In the Mind paper, Turing asked a number of questions, including whether computers could ever be said to have the power of “thinking” (“I propose to consider the question, Can computers think?” ...Alan Turing, Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind, 1950). Turing also set up a number of criteria—including his imitation game—under which a human could judge whether a computer could be said to be “intelligent”. Turing’s paper, as well as his important mathematical and computational insights of the 1930s and 1940s led to his popular acclaim as the “Father of Artificial Intelligence”. In the years since his paper was published, however, no computational system has fully satisfied Turing’s challenge. In this paper we focus on a different question, ignored in, but inspired by Turing’s work: How might the Artificial Intelligence practitioner implement “intelligence” on a computational device? Over the past 60 years, although the AI community has not produced a general-purpose computational intelligence, it has constructed a large number of important artifacts, as well as taken several philosophical stances able to shed light on the nature and implementation of intelligence. This paper contends that the construction of any human artifact includes an implicit epistemic stance. In AI this stance is found in commitments to particular knowledge representations and search strategies that lead to a product’s successes as well as its limitations. Finally, we suggest that computational and human intelligence are two different natural kinds, in the philosophical sense, and elaborate on this point in the conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Bartlett F (1932) Remembering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  2. Bayes T (1763) Essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 370–418

  3. Blackburn S (2008) The Oxford dictionary of philosophy, 15th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  4. Brooks RA (1989) A robot that walks: emergent behaviors from a carefully evolved network. Neural Comput 1(2):253–262

  5. Brooks RA (1991) Intelligence without representation. In: Kaufmann M (ed) International joint conference on artificial intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 596–575

  6. Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (eds) (1984) Rule-based expert systems: the MYCIN experiments of the stanford heuristic programming project. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  7. Chakrabarti C (2014) Artificial conversations for chatter bots using knowledge representation, learning, and pragmatics. Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM

  8. Chakrabarti C, Luger G (2014) An anatomy for artificial conversation generation in the customer service domain. In: 25th modern artificial intelligence and cognitive science conference, pp 80–85

  9. Chakrabarti C, Luger GF (2015) Artificial conversations for customer service chatter bots: architecture, algorithms, and evaluation metrics. Expert Syst Appl 42(20):6878–6897

  10. Chakrabarti C, Pless DJ, Rammohan RR, Luger GF (2007) Diagnosis using a first-order stochastic language that learns. Expert Syst Appl 32(3):832–840

  11. Chakrabarti C, Rammohan RR, Luger GF (2005) A first-order stochastic modeling language for diagnosis. In: Press A (ed) Proceedings of the 18th international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA

  12. Chakrabarti C, Rammohan RR, Luger GF (2005) A first-order stochastic prognostic system for the diagnosis of helicopter rotor systems for the US navy. In: Press E (ed) Second Indian international conference on artificial intelligence, Pune, India

  13. Chomsky N (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton, The Hague

  14. Church A (1936) An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. Am J Math 58(2):345–363

  15. Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  16. Collins A, Quillian MR (1969) Retreival time from semantic memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 8:240–247

  17. Copeland BJ (2015) The Church-Turing. Thesis

  18. Demptster AP (1968) A generalization of bayesian inference. J Roy Stat Soc 30(Series B):1–38

  19. Descartes R (1996/1680) Meditations on First Philosophy (trans: Cottingham J). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  20. Dewey J (1916) Democracy and education. Macmillan, New York

  21. Dreyfus H (1979) What computers still can’t do. MIT Press, Cambridge

  22. Dreyfus H (2002) Intelligence without representation—Merleau–Ponty’s critique of mental representation the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:367–383

  23. Epstein R, Roberts G, Poland G (eds) (2008) Parsing the turing test: philosophical and methodological issues in the quest for the thinking computer. Springer, Dordrecht

  24. Ferrucci D (2012) Introduction to “this is watson”. IBM J Res Dev 56(3–4):1–15

  25. Fikes RE, Nilsson NJ (1971) Strips: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to artificial intelligence. Artif Intell 1(2):227–232

  26. Glymour C (2001) The mind’s arrows: bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. MIT Press, New York

  27. Gopnik A (2011) Probabilistic models as theories of children’s minds. Behav Brain Sci 34(4):200–201

  28. Gopnik A (2011) A unified account of abstract structure and conceptual change. Probabilistic models and early learning mechanisms. Commentary on Susan Carey, “the origin of concepts”. Behav Brain Sci 34(3):126–129

  29. Gopnik A, Glymour C, Sobel DM, Schulz LE, Kushnir T, Danks D (2004) A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and bayes nets. Psychol Rev 111(1):3–32

  30. Grice P (1975) Logic and conversation. Syntax Semant 3:41–58

  31. Harmon P, King D (1985) Expert systems: artificial intelligence in business. Wiley, London

  32. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, London

  33. Hobbes T (2010/1651) Leviathan. Revised Edition. In: Martinich AP, Battiste B (eds) Broadview Press, Peterborough, ON

  34. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79:2554–2558

  35. James W (1981) Pragmatism. Hackett, London

  36. James W (2002) The varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green, and Co, UK

  37. Jurafsky D, Martin JH (2008) Speech and language processing, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  38. Kant I (1781) Immanuel Kant’s critique of pure reason. St. Martin’s Press, New York

  39. Klein WB, Westervelt RT, Luger GF (1999) A general purpose intelligent control system for particle accelerators. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 7(1):1–12

  40. Kolodner JL (1993) Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

  41. Kowalski R (1979) Logic for problem solving. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  42. Kushnir T, Gopnik A, Lucas C, Schulz L (2010) Inferring hidden causal structure. Cogn Sci 34:148–160

  43. Luger GF (2009) Artificial intelligence: structures and strategies for complex problem solving, 6th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  44. Masterman M (1961) Semantic message detection for machine translation, using interlingua. In: Proceedings of the 1961 international conference on machine translation

  45. McCarthy J (1968) Programs with common sense. MIT Press, Cambridge

  46. McCarthy J (1980) Circumscription, a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artif Intell 12:27–39

  47. McCarthy J (1986) Applications of circumscription to formalizing common-sense knowledge. Artif Intell 28:89–116

  48. McCarthy J, Hayes P (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. The University Press, UK

  49. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

  50. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

  51. Miller G (1956) The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81–97

  52. Miller GA (2003) The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 7:141–144

  53. Minsky M (1986) The society of mind. Simon and Schuster, New York

  54. Newell A, Simon H (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, Prentice

  55. Newell A, Simon H (1976) Computer science as empirical enquiry: symbols and search. Commun ACM 19(3):113–126

  56. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

  57. Pearl J (2000) Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  58. Peirce CS (1958) Collected papers 1931–1958. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  59. Piaget J (1954) The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books, London

  60. Piaget J (1970) Structuralism. Basic Books, London

  61. Pinker S, Bloom P (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behav Brain Sci 13:707–784

  62. Post E (1943) Formal reductions of the general combinatorial problem. Am J Math 65:197–268

  63. Quillian MR (1967) Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos

  64. Rammohan RR (2010) Three algorithms for causal learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM

  65. Rosenbloom PS, Lehman JF, Laird JE (1993) Overview of soar as a unified theory of cognition. In: Erlbaum (ed) Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society

  66. Ryle G (2002) The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  67. Sakhanenko NA, Luger GF, Stern CR (2006) Managing dynamic contexts using failure-driven stochastic models. In: Press A (ed) Proceedings of the FLAIRS conference

  68. Sakhanenko NA, Rammohan RR, Luger GF, Stern CR (2008) A new approach to model-based diagnosis using probabilistic logic. In: Press A (ed) Proceedings of the 21st FLAIRS conference

  69. Schank RC, Colby KM (1975) Computer models of thought and language. Freeman, San Francisco

  70. Searle J (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  71. Searle J (1975) Indirect speech acts, chap. 3. Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 59–82

  72. Simon H (1981) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, London

  73. Sowa JF (1984) Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  74. Sun R (ed) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  75. Turing A (1936) On computable numbers with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Lond Math Soci 2(42):230–265

  76. Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  77. VandenBos GR (ed) (2007) APA dictionary of psychology, 1st edn. American Psychological Association, Washington

  78. von Glaserfeld E (1978) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P (ed) The Invented Reality, pp 17–40. Norton, New York

  79. Wilks Y (1972) Grammar, meaning, and the machine analysis of language. Routledge and Kagen Paul, London

  80. Williams BC, Nayak PP (1996) A model-based approach to reactive self-reconfiguring systems. In: Press M (ed) Proceedings of the AAAI-96, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 971–978

  81. Williams BC, Nayak, PP (1997) A reactive planner for a model-based executive. In: Press M (ed) Proceedings of IJCAI-97

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to George F. Luger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luger, G.F., Chakrabarti, C. From Alan Turing to modern AI: practical solutions and an implicit epistemic stance. AI & Soc 32, 321–338 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-016-0646-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computational intelligence
  • Epistemic stance