‘Intermittent’ versus ‘continuous’ ScvO2 monitoring in children with septic shock: a randomised, non-inferiority trial
To compare the effect of ‘intermittent’ central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) monitoring with ‘continuous’ ScvO2 monitoring on shock resolution and mortality in children with septic shock.
Primary outcome was the achievement of therapeutic goals or shock resolution in the first 6 h. We randomly assigned children < 17 years’ age with septic shock to ‘intermittent ScvO2’ or ‘continuous ScvO2’ groups. All children were subjected to subclavian/internal jugular line insertion and managed as per Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. To guide resuscitation, we used ScvO2 estimated at other clinical and laboratory parameters were monitored similarly in both groups.
We enrolled 75 and 77 children [median (IQR) age: 6 (1.5–10) years] in the ‘intermittent’ and ‘continuous’ groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. When compared to the ‘continuous’ group, fewer children in the ‘intermittent’ group achieved shock resolution within first 6 h [19% vs. 36%; relative risk (RR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.29–0.89; risk difference − 18.0%; 95% CI − 32.0 to − 4.0]. The lower bound of confidence interval, however, crossed the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. There was no difference in the proportion of children attaining shock resolution within 24 h (63% vs. 69%; RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.68–1.08) or risk of mortality between the groups (47% vs. 43%; RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.74–1.51).
Given that a greater proportion of children attained therapeutic end points in the first 6 h, continuous monitoring of ScvO2 should preferably be used to titrate therapy in the first few hours in children with septic shock. In the absence of such facility, intermittent monitoring of ScvO2 can be used to titrate therapy in these children, given the lack of difference in the proportion of patients achieving shock resolution at 24 h or in risk of mortality between the intermittent and continuous groups.
KeywordsEGDT ScvO2 Intermittent ScvO2 monitoring Continuous ScvO2 monitoring
We would like to sincerely thank the contributions of Dr Vijay and the staff of the PICU towards the conduct of the trial.
The authors received Intramural Research Grant (No.F. 8-335/A-335/2-15/RS) from All India Institute of Medical Sciences for this project (~ 7000 USD).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 2.Sankar J, Dhochak N, Kumar K, Singh M, Sankar MJ, Lodha R (2019) Comparison of international pediatric sepsis consensus conference versus sepsis-3 definitions for children presenting with septic shock to a tertiary care center in India: a retrospective study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 20:e122–e129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Pappachan J et al (2017) Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcomes and Resource Evaluation (CORE) and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Paediatric Study Group. Prediction of pediatric sepsis mortality within 1 h of intensive care admission. Prediction of pediatric sepsis mortality within 1 h of intensive care admission. Intensiv Care Med 43:1085–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sankar J, Sankar MJ, Suresh CP, Sankar MJ, Dubey N (2014) Early goal-directed therapy in pediatric septic shock: comparison of outcomes “with” and “without” intermittent superior venacaval oxygen saturation monitoring: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15:e157–e167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Paula IRN, Timothy WS, Steven QS (2009) Effect of intermittent vs continuous scvo2 monitoring on sepsis bundle compliance and mortality. October 2009, Vol 136, No. 4 MeetingAbstractsGoogle Scholar
- 20.Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A (2005) International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr Intensiv Crit Care Soc 6: 2–8Google Scholar
- 24.Pediatric Advanced Life Support Provider Manual, Chameides L, Samson RA, Schexnayder SM, Hazinski MF (Eds) (2012) American Heart Association, DallasGoogle Scholar