Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 147–148 | Cite as

Distinction between good palliative care and intending death

  • E. Wesley ElyEmail author
  • Elie Azoulay
  • Charlie L. Sprung
Correspondence
  • 104 Downloads

Dear Editor,

We thank JL Vincent, J Creteur and FS Taccone [ 1] for their thoughtful comment on our article [ 2]. There is a key misunderstanding about one term on which the authors did not focus. This is the word “intent.”
  1. 1.

    We do not want anyone in critical care to believe that we are speaking against limitation of life support. When a patient or family judges that any intervention (e.g., tracheostomy) is not justifiable or not in the “best interests” of the patient (i.e., its risks and harms clearly outweigh benefit), then it should either be limited or not performed at all.

     
  2. 2.

    We wrote that we would “never intentionally shorten the life of a patient.” When practicing good end-of-life care, we are accompanying patients as they die naturally of their diseases and, when patients or families decide against life-sustaining treatment, we are avoiding the artificial prolongation of their dying process. In accepting the natural dying process and shifting to palliative care, we must always...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Vincent JL, Creteur J, Taccone FS (2019) Things we would never do regarding end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05816-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ely EW, Azoulay E, Sprung CL (2019) Eight things we would never do regarding end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 45:1116–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McClelland W, Goligher EC (2019) Withholding or withdrawing life support versus physician-assisted death: a distinction with a difference? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 32:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    WMA General Assembly (World Medical Association) Geneva, Switzerland, September 1948. Physician’s Pledge, updated at the 68th WMA General Assembly, Chicago US Oct 2017. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/. Accessed Oct 2, 2019
  5. 5.
    Goligher EC, Ely EW, Sulmasy DP, Bakker J, Raphael J, Volandes AE, Patel BM, Payne K, Hosie A, Churchill L, White DB, Downar J (2017) Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the ICU: a dialogue on core ethical issues. Crit Care Med 45:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sprung CL, Somerville MA, Radbruch L, Collet NS, Duttge G, Piva JP, Antonelli M, Sulmasy DP, Lemmens W, Ely EW (2018) Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: emerging issues from a global perspective. J Palliat Care 33:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vincent JL, Schetz M, De Waele JJ, de Clety SC, Michaux I, Sottiaux T, Hoste E, Ledoux D, De Weerdt A, Wilmer A, Belgian Society of Intensive Care M (2014) “Piece” of mind: end of life in the intensive care unit statement of the Belgian Society of Intensive Care Medicine. J Crit Care 29:174–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kompanje EJ, Epker JL, Bakker J (2014) Hastening death due to administration of sedatives and opioids after withdrawal of life-sustaining measures: even in the absence of discomfort? J Crit Care 29:455–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chambaere K, Vander Stichele R, Mortier F, Cohen J, Deliens L (2015) Recent trends in euthanasia and other end-of-life practices in Belgium. N Engl J Med 372:1179–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tennessee Valley Veteran’s Affairs Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (VA GRECC), Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations