Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 1258–1265 | Cite as

Early enteral nutrition for cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide inpatient database study

  • Hiroyuki Ohbe
  • Taisuke Jo
  • Hayato Yamana
  • Hiroki Matsui
  • Kiyohide Fushimi
  • Hideo Yasunaga
Original

Abstract

Purpose

Despite extensive research on enteral nutrition (EN) for patients in shock, it remains unclear whether this should be postponed in patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). In this study, we aimed to compare outcomes of early and delayed EN for patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring VA-ECMO.

Methods

In this retrospective database study drawing on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2016, we identified patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock who had received VA-ECMO for more than 2 days. We allocated the patients to two groups: those who received EN within 2 days (early) or 3 days or more (delayed) after starting VA-ECMO. We then used a marginal structural model to analyze associations between early EN and various outcomes, including in-hospital mortality and 28-day mortality.

Results

We identified 1769 eligible patients during the 69-month study period, 220 of whom (12%) received early EN. After using a marginal structural model to adjust for baseline and time-dependent confounders, we found that the early EN group showed significantly lower in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.62–0.98, P = 0.032] and lower 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.97, P = 0.031) than the delayed EN group.

Conclusions

According to this retrospective database study, early EN is not associated with harm but rather with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic or obstructive shock requiring at least 2 days of VA-ECMO.

Keywords

Enteral nutrition Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Venoarterial Bowel ischemia Marginal structural model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (H29-Policy-Designated-009 and H29-ICT-General-004); Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (17H04141); and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

134_2018_5319_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ventetuolo CE, Muratore CS (2014) Extracorporeal life support in critically ill adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190:497–508.  https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201404-0736CI CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aso S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H (2016) In-hospital mortality and successful weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: analysis of 5263 patients using a national inpatient database in Japan. Crit Care 20:80.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1261-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaffney AM, Wildhirt SM, Griffin MJ, Annich GM, Radomski MW (2010) Extracorporeal life support. BMJ.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5317 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reignier J, Boisrame-Helms J, Brisard L et al (2018) Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2). Lancet 13(391):133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32146-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schunn CD, Daly JM (1995) Small bowel necrosis associated with postoperative jejunal tube feeding. J Am Coll Surg 180:410–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott LK, Boudreaux K, Thaljeh F, Grier LR, Conrad SA (2004) Early enteral feedings in adults receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 28:295–300.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607104028005295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lukas G, Davies AR, Hilton AK, Pellegrino VA, Scheinkestel CD, Ridley E (2010) Nutritional support in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc 12:230–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Umezawa Makikado LD, Flordelis Lasierra JL, Perez-Vela JL, Colino Gómez L, Torres Sánchez E, Maroto Rodríguez B, Arribas López P, Montejo González JC (2013) Early enteral nutrition in adults receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational case series. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 37:281–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607112451464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrie S, Herkes R, Forrest P (2013) Nutrition support during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in adults: a retrospective audit of 86 patients. Intensive Care Med 39:1989–1994.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-3053-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reintam Blaser A, Starkopf J, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med 43:380–398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4665-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamana H, Moriwaki M, Horiguchi H, Kodan M, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H (2017) Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data. J Epidemiol 27:476–482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2016.09.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heyland D, Dhaliwal R, Drover J, Gramlich L, Dodek P et al (2003) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 27:355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kreymann K, Berger M, Deutz N, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P et al (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 25:210–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McClave S, Taylor B, Martindale R, Warren M, Johnson D et al (2016) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 40:159–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doig G, Heighes P, Simpson F, Sweetman E, Davies A (2015) Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Med 35:2018–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt M, Burrell A, Roberts L, Bailey M, Sheldrake J et al (2015) Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score. Eur Heart J 36:2246–2256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shigematsu K, Nakano H, Watanabe Y (2013) The eye response test alone is sufficient to predict stroke outcome—reintroduction of Japan Coma Scale: a cohort study. BMJ Open 3:e002736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel JM, Sundararajan V (2011) Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 173:676–682.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq433 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robins J, Hernán M, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hernán M, Brumback B, Robins J (2000) Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 11:561–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cole SR, Hernan MA (2008) Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol 168:656–664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    VanderWeele TJ, Ding P (2017) Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E value. Ann Intern Med 167:268–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gianotti L, Alexander J, Nelson J, Fukushima R, Pyles T et al (1994) Role of early enteral feeding and acute starvation on postburn bacterial translocation and host defense: prospective, randomized trials. Crit Care Med 22:265–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gramlich L, Kichian K, Pinilla J, Rodych N, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK (2004) Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in better outcomes in critically ill adult patients? A systematic review of the literature. Nutrition 20:843–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kang W, Kudsk K (2007) Is there evidence that the gut contributes to mucosal immunity in humans? JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 31:246–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kudsk K (2002) Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition. Am J Surg 183:390–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Windsor A, Kanwar S, Li A, Barnes E, Guthrie J, Spark JI, Welsh F, Guillou PJ, Reynolds JV (1998) Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Gut 42:431–435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braga M, Gianotti L, Gentilini O, Parisi V, Salis C, Di Carlo V (2001) Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition. Crit Care Med 29:242–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao L, Luo L, Chen J, Xiao J, Jia W, Xiao Y (2014) Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alleviates intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in prolonged hemorrhagic shock animal model. Cell Biochem Biophys 70:1733–1740.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-0121-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and ESICM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public HealthThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and InformaticsTokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations