Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs: bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics

  • 651 Accesses

  • 30 Citations

Abstract

Background

Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs (nHFOV) has been proposed as a new respiratory support in neonatology. We studied the effect of ventilation parameters and nasal prongs on nHFOV efficacy and mechanics.

Methods

Customized sealed circuits connecting a SM3100A oscillator to a neonatal lung model were developed to evaluate the effect of applying HFOV via two different sized nasal prongs on delivered tidal volume and pressure. Measurements were made across a range of frequencies and pressures; amplitude was set to obtain visible lung oscillation.

Results

Volume delivered by peak-to-peak oscillation, ventilation, and pressure significantly differed among the interfaces, being higher for large cannulae and the control circuit (p < 0.0001). The interposition of a large or small nasal prong reduced volume to 56 and 26%, ventilation to 32 and 9%, and mean pressure to 83 and 79%, respectively, of the values measured for the direct connection of the oscillator to the test lung. Volume and ventilation were inversely related to frequency, which was particularly evident with larger diameter circuits due to higher delivered tidal volume (R 2 > 0.9). Increasing ventilation was associated with larger tidal volume and nasal prong diameter (adjusted R 2 = 0.97).

Conclusions

nHFOV using common nasal prongs is technically possible. Efficiency of tidal volume delivery is significantly affected by prong diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

DCO2 :

Ventilation during HFOV

HFOV:

High frequency oscillatory ventilation

T v :

Tidal volume

nHFOV:

Nasal noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation

nCPAP:

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure

P aw :

Mean pressure at the airway opening

ΔP :

Peak-to-peak pressure amplitude

P L :

Distal pressure measured at the lung model

References

  1. 1.

    Greenough A, Premkumar M, Patel D (2008) Ventilatory strategies for the extremely premature infant. Pediatr Anesth 18:371–377

  2. 2.

    Henderson-Smart DJ, De Paoli AG, Clark RH, Bhuta T (2009) High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD002974

  3. 3.

    Zecca E, De Luca D, Costa S, Marras M, Romagnoli C (2006) Neonatal intensive care and outcomes of extremely preterm infants: changes over a decade. Ital J Pediatr 32:48–54. http://www.ijponline.net

  4. 4.

    Henderson-Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, Offringa M (2007) Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD000104

  5. 5.

    Hofhuis W, Huysman MW, van der Wiel EC, Holland WP, Hop WC, Brinkhorst G, de Jongste JC, Merkus P (2002) Worsening of V′max FRC in infants with chronic lung disease in the first year of life: a more favorable outcome after high frequency oscillation ventilation. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 166:1539–1543

  6. 6.

    Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG (2008) Neonatal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93:F148–F150

  7. 7.

    Colaizy TT, Younis UMM, Bell EF, Klein JM (2008) Nasal high frequency ventilation for premature infants. Acta Paediatr 97:1518–1522

  8. 8.

    Scalfaro P, Pillow JJ, Sly PD, Cotting J (2001) Reliable tidal volume estimates at the airway opening with an infant monitor during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Crit Care Med 29:1925–1930

  9. 9.

    Chang HK (1984) Mechanisms of gas transport during ventilation by high frequency oscillation. J Appl Physiol 56:553–564

  10. 10.

    Boynton BR, Hammond MD, Fredberg JJ, Buckley BG, Villanueva D, Frantz ID (1989) Gas exchange in healthy rabbits during high frequency oscillatory ventilation. J Appl Physiol 66:1343–1351

  11. 11.

    Norusis M (2004) SPSS 13.0 advanced statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle-River

  12. 12.

    Cameron AC, Windmeijer FAG (1997) An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econometrics 77:329–342

  13. 13.

    van der Hoeven M, Brouwer E, Blannco CE (1998) Nasal high frequency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 79:F61–F63

  14. 14.

    Carlo WA (2008) Should nasal high frequency ventilation be used in preterm infants? Acta Paediatr 97:1484–1485

  15. 15.

    Desager KN, Cauberghs M, Naudts J, van de Woestijne KP (1999) Influence of upper airway shunt on total respiratory impedance in infants. J Appl Physiol 87:902–909

  16. 16.

    Loos N, Peslin R, Marchal F (2000) Respiratory and upper airways impedance responses to methacholine inhalation in spontaneously breathing cats. Eur Resp J 15:1001–1008

  17. 17.

    Fredberg JJ, Glass GM, Boynton BR, Frantz ID (1987) Factors influencing mechanical performance of neonatal high frequency ventilators. J Appl Physiol 62:2485–2490

  18. 18.

    De Paoli AG, Morley CJ, Davis PG, Lau R, Hingeley E (2002) In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 86:F42–F45

  19. 19.

    Hatcher D, Watanabe H, Ashbury T, Incent S, Fisher J, Froese A (1998) Mechanical performance of clinically available, neonatal, high-frequency, oscillatory-type ventilators. Crit Care Med 26:1081–1088

  20. 20.

    Jouvet P, Hubert P, Isabey D, Pinquier D, Dahan E, Cloup M, Harf A (1997) Assessment of high frequency neonatal ventilator performances. Intensive Care Med 23:208–213

  21. 21.

    Gerstmann DR, Fouke JM, Winter DC, Taylor AF, de Lemos RA (1990) Proximal, tracheal and alveolar pressures during high frequency oscillatory ventilation in a normal rabbit model. Pediatr Res 28:367–373

  22. 22.

    Derdak S (2003) High frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adult patients. Crit Care Med 31(Suppl):S317–S323

  23. 23.

    Schindler M, Seear M (1991) The effect of lung mechanics on gas transport during high frequency oscillation. Pediatr Pulmonol 11:335–339

  24. 24.

    Boynton BR, Carlo WA (1994) Pulmonary gas exchange during high frequency ventilation. In: Boyton BR, Carlo WA, Jobe AH (eds) New therapies for neonatal respiratory failure. A physiological approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 218–244

  25. 25.

    Pillow JJ, Sly PD, Hantos Z, Bates JHT (2002) Dependency of intrapulmonary pressure amplitude on respiratory mechanics during high frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm lambs. Pediatr Res 52:538–544

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Correspondence to Daniele De Luca.

Additional information

Study results were presented in part as oral communication to the 50th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Pediatric Research (ESPR) held in Hamburg (Germany), 10 October 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Luca, D., Carnielli, V.P., Conti, G. et al. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs: bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics. Intensive Care Med 36, 2094–2100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2054-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bench study
  • HFOV
  • Noninvasive ventilation
  • Preterm neonate