Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Spätfolgen der Sectioentbindung: Narbendefekte und Plazentationsstörungen

Vorbeugen, erkennen, behandeln

Sequelae of cesarean section: scar defects and morbidly adherent placenta

Prevent, recognize, treat

  • 392 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5


  1. 1.

    Algert CS, Morris JM, Simpson JM, Ford JB, Roberts CL (2008) Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 112(5):1061–1066

  2. 2.

    Ardovino M, Castaldi MA, Fraternali F, Ardovino I, Colacurci N, Signoriello G, Cobellis L (2013) Bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: clinical features. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(12):1006–1010

  3. 3.

    Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Leveno KJ, Iams JD, Tita AT, Saade G, Rouse DJ, Blackwell SC, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network (2015) Morbidly adherent placenta treatments and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 125(3):683–689

  4. 4.

    Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Bourne T, Huirne JA (2014) Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43(4):372–382

  5. 5.

    Cali G, Forlani F, Minneci G, Foti F, Di Liberto S, Familiari A, Scambia G, D’Antonio F (2017) First trimester prediction of surgical outcome in abnormal invasive placenta using the cross-over sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1002/uog.17440

  6. 6.

    Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Tana R, Russo N, Artini PG, Pluchino N (2013) Fertility and endocrine outcome after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM). Gynecol Endocrinol 29(1):79–82

  7. 7.

    Cheng KK, Lee MM (2015) Rising incidence of morbidly adherent placenta and its association with previous caesarean section: a 15-year analysis in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 21(6):511–517

  8. 8.

    Clausen C, Stensballe J, Albrechtsen CK, Hansen MA, Lönn L, Langhoff-Roos J (2013) Balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries in the multidisciplinary management of placenta percreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(4):386–391

  9. 9.

    Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, Calda P, Langhoff-Roos J, Morel O, Stefanovic V, Tutschek B, Chantraine F, European Working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta (EW-AIP) (2016) Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47(3):271–275

  10. 10.

    CORONIS collaborative group, Abalos E, Addo V, Brocklehurst P, El Sheikh M, Farrell B, Gray S, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Mathews JE, Naz Masood S, Oyarzun E, Oyieke J, Sharma JB, Spark P (2016) Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10039):62–72

  11. 11.

    D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A (2013) Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42(5):509–517

  12. 12.

    Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G, Berghella V (2017) Risk of cesarean scar defect in single- versus double-layer uterine closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1002/uog.17401

  13. 13.

    Engelbrechtsen L, Langhoff-Roos J, Kjer JJ, Istre O (2015) Placenta accreta: adherent placenta due to Asherman syndrome. Clin Case Rep 3(3):175–178

  14. 14.

    Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M (2012) Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PLOS ONE 7(12):e52893

  15. 15.

    Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, Okada M, Suzuki M, Tamakoshi K, Kikkawa F (2006) Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(4):429–434

  16. 16.

    Jastrow N, Gauthier RJ, Gagnon G, Leroux N, Beaudoin F, Bujold E (2010) Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(6):563.e1–563.e7

  17. 17.

    Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D (2012) Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta 33(4):244–251

  18. 18.

    Kaelin Agten A, Cali G, Monteagudo A, Oviedo J, Ramos J, Timor-Tritsch I (2017) The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216(5):510.e1–510.e6

  19. 19.

    Kamara M, Henderson JJ, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE, Pennell CE (2013) The risk of placenta accreta following primary elective caesarean delivery: a case-control study. BJOG 120(7):879–886

  20. 20.

    Langhoff-Roos J, Chantraine F, Geirsson RT (2013) AIP (abnormally invasive placenta)-from a retained placenta to destruction of the uterine wall. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(4):367–368

  21. 21.

    Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy; a feasible technique for removal of unfavorably localized myomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(9):994–999

  22. 22.

    Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2011) Pregnancy following robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in women with deep intramural myomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(9):972–977

  23. 23.

    Matsubara S, Kuwata T, Usui R, Watanabe T, Izumi A, Ohkuchi A, Suzuki M, Nakata M (2013) Important surgical measures and techniques at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92(4):372–377

  24. 24.

    Marotta MA, Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Darii N, Donnez O (2013) Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(3):386–391

  25. 25.

    Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L (2009) High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(1):90–97

  26. 26.

    Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E (2016) Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol A214(4):507

  27. 27.

    Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N, Moore L, Jastrow N, Demers S, Bujold E (2012) Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect. Am J Perinatol 29(6):465–471

  28. 28.

    Roberge S, Bujold E (2015) Closure of uterus and the risk of uterine rupture. BJOG 122(11):1542

  29. 29.

    Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, Moore L, Jastrow N, Brassard N, Gauthier RJ, Hudic I, Shipp TD, Weimar CH, Fatusic Z, Demers S, Bujold E (2011) Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115(1):5–10

  30. 30.

    Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E (2014) Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 211(5):453–460

  31. 31.

    Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M (2006) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1373–1381

  32. 32.

    Schepker N, Garcia-Rocha G, Versen-Höynck F, Hillemanns P, Schippert C (2015) Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(6):1417–1423

  33. 33.

    Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, Abuhamad AZ, Simhan H, Huls CK, Belfort MA, Wright JD (2015) Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(5):561–568

  34. 34.

    Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107:1226–1232

  35. 35.

    Sumigama S, Sugiyama C, Kotani T, Hayakawa H, Inoue A, Mano Y, Tsuda H, Furuhashi M, Yamamuro O, Kinoshita Y, Okamoto T, Nakamura H, Matsusawa K, Sakakibara K, Oguchi H, Kawai M, Shimoyama Y, Tamakoshi K, Kikkawa F (2014) Uterine sutures at prior caesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study. BJOG 121(7):866–874 (discussion 875)

  36. 36.

    Timor-Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, Ramos J, Berg R, Kovács S (2015) Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med 34(4):601–610

  37. 37.

    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A (2012) Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(1):14–29

  38. 38.

    Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Bujold E, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, Pasquier JC, Girard M, Chaillet N, Boulvain M, Jastrow N (2017) Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.042

  39. 39.

    van der Voet LF, Vervoort AJ, Veersema S, Bij deVaate AJ, Brölmann HAM, Huirne JAF (2014) Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review. BJOG 121(2):145–156

  40. 40.

    Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA (2015) Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod 30(12):2695–2702

  41. 41.

    Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L (2011) Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 117(3):525–532

  42. 42.

    Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L (2010) Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. BJOG 117(9):1119–1126

  43. 43.

    Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ (2009) Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(1):85–89

  44. 44.

    Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, Aygün M, Savan K (2006) Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 124(1):32–36

  45. 45.

    Zosmer N, Fuller J, Shaikh H, Johns J, Ross JA (2015) Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(3):367–375

  46. 46.

    Zhang X (2017) Laparoscopic repair of cesarean section scar defect and the surgical outcome in 146 patients. Int J Clin Exp Med 10:4408–4416

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to PD Dr. med. Angela Köninger.

Ethics declarations


A. Köninger, A. Winter, P. Rusch, M. Heubner, P. Mach und R. Kimmig geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information


T. Fehm, Düsseldorf

R. Kimmig, Essen

N. Maass, Kiel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köninger, A., Winter, A., Rusch, P. et al. Spätfolgen der Sectioentbindung: Narbendefekte und Plazentationsstörungen. Gynäkologe 50, 785–792 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-017-4115-2

Download citation