Advertisement

Controlled Release of Spirotetramat Using Starch–Chitosan–Alginate-Encapsulation

  • Yan-Li Xie
  • Wayne Jiang
  • Fen Li
  • Yu Zhang
  • Xiao-Yu Liang
  • Meng Wang
  • Xueqing Zhou
  • Shao-Ying WuEmail author
  • Cheng-Hui ZhangEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study was intended to develop an environment-friendly controlled release system for spirotetramat in an alginate matrix. Four formulations, starch–chitosan–calcium alginate (SCCA), starch–calcium alginate (SCA), chitosan–calcium alginate (CCA), and calcium alginate (CA) complex gel beads, were prepared by the extrusion–exogenous gelation method. The properties of the formulations were studied. The results showed that the release behaviors of the formulations in water could be well described by the logistic model, and the release occurred through Fickian diffusion. Among the four formulations, SCCA showed the highest entrapment efficiency, drug loading and the slowest release rate. Degradation studies revealed that the SCCA formulation exhibited an obvious slower degradation rate of spirotetramat in soils than the commercially available formulation. The estimated half-life of the SCCA formulation was 2.31, 3.25, and 4.51 days in waterloggogenic paddy soil, purplish soil, and montmorillonite, respectively, when the soils were moistened to 60% of its dry weight. This study provided a possible approach to prolong the duration of spirotetramat and to reduce environmental contamination.

Keywords

Spirotetramat Controlled release Alginate–chitosan–starch-gel Degradation in soil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (218QN186), the Hainan Key R & D plan (ZDYF2018062), Hainan University [KYQD(ZR)1963, KYQD(ZR)1951].

References

  1. Alfatama M, Lim LY, Wong TW (2018) Alginate-C18 conjugate nanoparticles loaded in tripolyphosphate-cross-linked chitosan-oleic acid conjugate-coated calcium alginate beads as oral insulin carrier. Mol Pharm 15:3369–3382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brück E, Elbert A, Fischer R, Krueger S, Kühnhold J, Klueken A, Nauen R, Niebes JF, Reckmann U, Schnorbach HJ, Steffens R, Van Waetermeulen X (2009) Movento, an innovative ambimobile insecticide for sucking insect pest control in agriculture: biological profile and field performance. Crop Protect 28:838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campos EVR, DeOliveira JL, Fraceto LF, Singh B (2015) Polysaccharides as safer release systems for agrochemicals. Agron Sustain Dev 35:47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantoni A, De Maeyer L, Izquierdo Casas J, Niebes JF, Peeters D, Roffeni S, SilvaJ Villalobos A (2008) Development of Movento® on key pests and crops in European countries. Bayer Crop Sci J 61:349–376Google Scholar
  5. Chauhan N, Dilbaghi N, Gopal M, Kumar R, Kim KH, Kuma S (2017) Development of chitosan nanocapsules for the controlled release of hexaconazole. Int J Biol Macromol 97:616–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choudhary S, Bhatia SR (2012) Rheology and nanostructure of hydrophobically modified alginate (HMA) gels and solutions. Carbohydr Polym 87:524–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Araújo Etchepare M, Raddatz GC, De Moraes Flores EM, Zepka LQ, Jacob-Lopes E, Barin JS, Grosso CRF, De Menezes CR (2016) Effect of resistant starch and chitosan on survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus microencapsulated with sodium alginate. LWT Food Sci Technol 65:511–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faria DM, Júnior SMD, do Nascimento JPL, Da Silva Nunes E, Marques RP, Rossino LS, Moreto JA (2017) Development and evaluation of a controlled release system of TBH herbicide using alginate microparticles. Mater Res 20:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernández-Pérez M, Villafranca-Sánchez M, González-Pradas E, Martinez-López F, Flores-Céspedes F (2000) Controlled release of carbofuran from an alginate-bentonite formulation: water release kinetics and soil mobility. J Agric Food Chem 48:938–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frederiksen HK, Hansen HCB, Borggaard O, Pedersen M (2002) Starch-encapsulated chlorpyrifos: release rate, insecticidal activity and degradation in soil. J Microencapsul 19:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hou L, Wu P (2019) Exploring the hydrogen-bond structures in sodium alginate through two dimensional correlation infrared spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 205:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ionita M, Pandele MA, Iovu H (2013) Sodium alginate/graphene oxide composite films with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. Carbohydr Polym 94:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kenawy ER, Sakran MA (1996) Controlled release formulations of agrochemicals from calcium alginate. Ind Eng Chem Res 35:3726–3729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim WT, Chung H, Shin IS, Yam KL, Chung D (2008) Characterization of calcium alginate and chitosan-treated calcium alginate gel beads entrapping allyl isothiocyanate. Carbohydr Polym 71:566–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar S, Bhanjana G, Sharma A, Sidhu MC, Dilbaghi N (2014) Synthesis, characterization and on field evaluation of pesticide loaded sodium alginate nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 101:1061–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lawrie G, Keen I, Drew B, Chandler-Temple A, Rintoul L, Fredericks P, Grøndahl L (2007) Interactions between alginate and chitosan biopolymers characterized using FTIR and XPS. Biomacromolecules 8:2533–2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li W (2011) Study on preparation procedure for emamectin benzoate microcapsule and property characterization. Shandong Agricultural University, TaianGoogle Scholar
  18. Li S, Liu X, Dong F, Xu J, Xu H, Hu M, Zheng Y (2016) Chemometric-assisted QuEChERS extraction method for the residue analysis of thiacloprid, spirotetramat and spirotetramat’s four metabolites in pepper: application of their dissipation patterns. Food Chem 192:893–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Likas DT, Tsiropoulos NG (2007) Behaviour of fenitrothion residues in leaves and soil of vineyard after treatment with microencapsulate and emulsified formulations. Int J Environ Anal Chem 87(13–14):927–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Łozowicka B, Mojsak P, Kaczyński P, Konecki R, Borusiewicz A (2017) The fate of spirotetramat and dissipation metabolites in Apiaceae and Brassicaceae leaf-root and soil system under greenhouse conditions estimated by modified QuEChERS/LC–MS/MS. Sci Total Environ 603–604:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mastan J, Srinivas BN, Rao TN, Rao NK (2016) Dissipation kinetics of spirotetramat and its metabolite in four different soils. ACAIJ 16(10):433–440Google Scholar
  22. Nauen R, Reckmann U, Thomzik J, Thielert W (2008) Biological profile of spirotetramat (Movento)—a new two way systemic (amimobile) insecticide against sucking pests species. Bayer Crop Sci J 61:245–278Google Scholar
  23. PPDB (Pesticide Properties DataBase) (2014) The footprint pesticide properties database. University of Hertfordshire, UK. Accessed 15 Sept 2019 http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/footprint/es/
  24. Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987a) A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Controlled Release 5:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987b) A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J Controlled Release 5:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy A, Singh SK, Bajpai J, Bajpai AK (2014) Controlled pesticide release from biodegradable polymers. Cent Eur J Chem 12(4):453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shahzad S, Shahzadi L, Mahmood N, Siddiqi SA, Rauf A, Manzoor F, Chaudhry AA, Ur Rehman I, Yar M (2016) A new synthetic methodology for the preparation of biocompatible and organo-soluble barbituric and thiobarbituric acid based chitosan derivatives for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 66:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shazly GA (2017) Ciprofloxacin controlled-solid lipid nanoparticles: characterization, in vitro release, and antibacterial activity assessment. Biomed Res Int 4:1–9Google Scholar
  29. Singh B, Sharma DK, Kumar R, Gupta A (2009) Controlled release of the fungicide thiram from starch–alginate–clay based formulation. Appl Clay Sci 45:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sopeña F, Maqueda C, Morillo E (2009) Controlled release formulations of herbicides based on micro-encapsulation. Cienc Invest Agr 35(1):27–42Google Scholar
  31. Tan W, Li Q, Dong F, Chen Q, Guo Z (2017) Preparation and characterization of novel cationic chitosan derivatives bearing quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts and assessment of their antifungal properties. Molecules 22:1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang JS, Ren HB, Xie YJ (2011) Synthesis of amidic alginate derivatives and their application in microencapsulation of λ-cyhalothrin. Biomacromolecules 12:2982–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Ecology and EnvironmentHainan UniversityHaikouChina
  2. 2.Analysis and Testing CenterHainan UniversityHaikouChina
  3. 3.Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Haikou)Ministry of AgricultureHaikouChina
  4. 4.Department of EntomologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  5. 5.College of Plant ProtectionHainan UniversityHaikouChina

Personalised recommendations