Degradation Dynamics of Halosulfuron-methyl in Two Textured Soils

  • Ritu Devi
  • Anil DuhanEmail author
  • Satbir Singh Punia
  • Dharam Bir Yadav


A laboratory experiment was conducted to study the degradation dynamics of halosulfuron-methyl residues in sandy loam and clay loam soil. The herbicide formulation was applied at 0.034 and 0.068 mg kg− 1 equivalent to field application dose of 67.5 and 135 g a.i. ha− 1 as single and double dose respectively. Soil samples were collected on 0 (1 h), 1, 3, 7, 10, 15, 30 and 45 days after treatments. Extraction was done using modified QuEChERS method. Residues were estimated by UPLC coupled with quadrupole Dalton mass detector. Average recoveries ranged from 85.5% to 94.5% for both soils at different fortification levels of 0.005 to 0.1 mg kg− 1 with limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) as 0.001 and 0.005 mg kg− 1, respectively. Dissipation followed first order kinetics with half-life of 8.4 to 10.7 days in both soil at two doses. The residues reached below LOQ of 0.005 mg kg− 1 after 45 days of herbicide application.


Halosulfuron-methyl Residues Soil QuEChERS UPLC–QDa 



The authors are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi and Directorate of Weed Research, Jabalpur India for providing necessary facilities and financial support during the study.


  1. Azania CAM, Rolim JC, Azania AAPM (2008) Plantas daninhas. In: Dinardo-Miranda LL, Vasconcelos ACM, Landell MGA (eds) Canade-de-acucar. Inst Agron, Campinas, p 465–490Google Scholar
  2. Dermiyati, Kuwatsuka S, Yamamoto I (1997a) Degradation of the herbicide halosulfuron-methyl in two soils under different environmental conditions. J Pest Sci 22:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dermiyati, Kuwatsuka S, Yamamoto I (1997b) Relationship between soil properties and sorption behaviour of the herbicide halosulfuron-methyl in selected Japanese soils. J Pest Sci 22:288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fantke P, Juraske R (2013) Variability of pesticide dissipation half-lives in plants. Environ Sci Technol 47:3548–3562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall L, Beckie H, Wolf T (1999) How herbicides work—biology to application. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, EdmontonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoskins WM (1961) Mathematical treatment of loss of pesticide residues. Plant Prot Bull (FAO) 9:163–168Google Scholar
  7. Lozowicka B, Micinski J, Zwierzchowski G, Kowalski IM, Szafarek J (2012) Cereal grain and feed material containing residues of plant protection chemicals and their effects on human and animal health. Pol J Environ Stud 21:181–190Google Scholar
  8. Lozowicka B, Kaczynski P, Paritova A, Sarsembayeva N, Kuzembekova G, Abzhalieva A, Alihan K (2014) Pesticide residues in grain from Kazakhstan and potential health risk associated with the exposures to detected pesticides. Food Chem Toxicol 68:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pandey J, Singh RP (1994) Effect of sulfonylurea herbicides on weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J Agron 39:565–568Google Scholar
  10. Rajasekharam C, Ramesh A (2013) Adsorption and degradation of herbicide halosulfuron-methyl in Indian soils. J Ecol Environ Sci 2(1):40–46Google Scholar
  11. Wang Y, Du L, Zhou X, Tan H, Bai L, Zeng D, Tian H (2012) QuEChERS extraction for high performance liquid chromatographic determination of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl in soil. J Chem Soc Pak 34(1):104–114Google Scholar
  12. Zheng W, Yates SR, Papiernik SK (2008) Transformation kinetics and mechanism of the sulfonylurea herbicides pyrazosulfuron ethyl and halosulfuron-methyl in aqueous solutions. J Agric Food Chem 56:7367–7372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhong HJ, Liu JX, Wu XJ, Dong XH, Cai M (2011) The dissipation and residues of 75% WDG halosulfuron-methyl in maize and soil. J Agrochem 50:906–908Google Scholar
  14. Amrein J, Gerber HR (1985) CGA 131036—a new herbicide for broadleaved weed control in cereals. In; British crop protection conference, weeds, p 55–62Google Scholar
  15. Beyer EM, Brown HM, Duffy MJ (1987) Sulfonylurea herbicide soil relations. In: Proceedings of the British crop protection conference—weeds. University of Wisconsin, BCPC Publication, p 531–540Google Scholar
  16. Document No. SANCO/10684/2009 (2009) Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. European Commission, Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection 8:14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ritu Devi
    • 1
  • Anil Duhan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Satbir Singh Punia
    • 2
  • Dharam Bir Yadav
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural UniversityHisarIndia
  2. 2.Agrochemicals Residues Testing Laboratory, Department of AgronomyChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural UniversityHisarIndia

Personalised recommendations