Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Environmental Effects of Using Chelating Agents in Polluted Sediment Remediation

Abstract

The results of laboratory scale experimental tests of contaminant extraction from marine sediment slurries are presented and discussed. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of EDTA and rhamnolipid in copper removal from an artificially contaminated sediment. The comparison was made in terms of metal extraction yield, and in the evaluation of its mobilization towards the more exchangeable fractions in the sediment. Results show that, under acidic conditions established during washing, EDTA ensured higher extractions efficiencies of Cu (up to 95 %) than rhamnolipid, although there was less mobilization into bioavailable forms with the use of rhamnolipid. In addition, in the view of a biological treatment of the spent solution, the use of rhamnolipid resulted in a lower decrease of the specific oxygen uptake rate with respect to EDTA. In fact, the low surfactants concentration required, partially compensated the toxic effect of Cu towards biomass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. APHA, Awwa, WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

  2. Copp J, Spanjers H (2004) Simulation of respirometry-based detection and mitigation of activated sludge toxicity. Control Eng Pract 12:305–313

  3. Dahrazma B, Mulligan CN (2007) Investigation of the removal of heavy metals from sediments using rhamnolipid in a continuous flow configuration. Chemosphere 63:705–711

  4. Dalzell DJ, Alte S, Aspichueta E, de la Sota A, Etxebarria J, Gutirrez M, Hoffmann CC, Sales D, Obst U, Christofi N (2002) A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge. Chemosphere 47:535–545

  5. Di Palma L (2009) Influence of indigeneous and added iron on copper extraction from soil. J Hazard Mater 170:96–102

  6. Di Palma L, Ferrantelli P (2005) Copper leaching from a sandy soil: mechanism and parameters affecting EDTA extraction. J Hazard Mater B122:85–90

  7. Di Palma L, Ferrantelli P, Medici F (2005) Heavy metal extraction from contaminated soil: recovery of the flushing solution. J Environ Manage 77:205–211

  8. Di Palma L, Mecozzi R (2007) Heavy metal mobilization from harbour sediments with EDTA and citric acid. J Hazard Mater 147:768–775

  9. Di Palma L, Verdone N (2012) Metals extraction from contaminated soils: model validation and parameters estimation. Chem Eng Trans 28:193–198

  10. Di Palma L, Gonzini O, Mecozzi R (2011) Use of different chelating agents for heavy metal extraction from contaminated harbour sediment. Chem Ecol 27:97–106

  11. Di Palma L, Mancini D, Petrucci E (2012) Experimental assessment of chromium mobilization from polluted soil by washing. Chem Eng Trans 28:145–150

  12. Gutierrez M, Etxebarria J, de las Fuentes L (2002) Evaluation of wastewater toxicity: comparative study between Microtox® and activated sludge oxygen uptake inhibition. Water Res 36:919–924

  13. Herman DC, Artiola JF, Miller RM (1995) Removal of cadmium, lead, and zinc from soil by a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Environ Sci Technol 29:2280–2285

  14. Italian Environmental Regulation (2006) Environmental standards assessment, G.U.R.I. n. 88 of April 14th 2006

  15. Juliastuti SR, Baeyens J, Creemers C, Bixio D, Lodewyckx E (2003) The inhibitory effects of heavy metals and organic compounds on the net maximum specific growth rate of the autotrophic biomass in activated sludge. J Hazard Mater 100:271–283

  16. Kim C, Lee Y, Ong SK (2003) Factors affecting EDTA extraction of lead from lead-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 51:845–853

  17. Lei M, Liao B, Zeng Q, Qin P, Khan S (2008) Fraction distributions of lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in metal-contaminated soil before and after extraction with disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 39:1963–1978

  18. Liu C, Evett JB (2002) Soil properties, testing, measurement, and evaluation, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York

  19. Madoni P, Davoli D, Guglielmi L (1998) Response of SOUR and AUR to heavy metal contamination in activated sludge. Water Res 33:2459–2464

  20. Maketon W, Zenner CS, Ogden KL (2008) Removal efficiency and binding mechanisms of copper and copper-EDTA complexes using polyethyleneimine. Environ Sci Technol 42:2124–2129

  21. Moutsatsou A, Gregou M, Matsas D, Protonotarios V (2006) Washing as a remediation technology applicable in soils heavily polluted by mining–metallurgical activities. Chemosphere 63:1632–1640

  22. Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133:183–198

  23. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Heavy metal removal from sediments by biosurfactants. J Hazard Mater 85:111–125

  24. Neale CN, Bricka RY, Chao AC (1997) Evaluating acids and chelating agents for removing heavy metals from contaminated soils. Environ Prog 16:274–280

  25. Neilson JW, Artiola JF, Maier RN (2003) Characterization of lead removal from contaminated soils by non toxic washing agents. J Environ Qual 32:899–908

  26. Ochoa-Loza FJ, Artiola JF, Maier RM (2001) Stability constants for the complexation of various metals with a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Environ Qual 30:479–485

  27. Oviedo C, Rodríguez J (2003) EDTA: the chelating agent under environmental scrutiny. Quim Nova 26:901–905

  28. Pernetti M, Di Palma L (2005) Experimental evaluation of inhibition effects of saline wastewater on activated sludge. Environ Technol 26:695–704

  29. Pociecha M, Lestan D (2012) Novel EDTA and process water recycling method after soil washing of multi-metal contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 201–202:273–279

  30. Vilar S, Gutierrez A, Antezana J, Carral P, Alvarez A (2005) A comparative study of three different methods for the sequential extraction of heavy metals in soil. Toxicol Environ Chem 87:1–10

  31. Voegelin A, Barmettler K, Kretzschmar R (2003) Heavy metal release from contaminated soils: comparison of column leaching and batch extraction results. J Environ Qual 32:865–875

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by INAIL, Grant. B 01/DIPIA, Programme 2009-11 P2.

Author information

Correspondence to Luca Di Palma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Palma, L., Petrucci, E. & Pietrangeli, B. Environmental Effects of Using Chelating Agents in Polluted Sediment Remediation. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94, 340–344 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-014-1437-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sediment remediation
  • Washing
  • Biosurfactants
  • Extractions
  • Metal complexes
  • Toxicity