Social capital and psychosis: a scoping review
Social capital has been studied as a risk factor for psychotic disorders. The purpose of this scoping review was to scope the literature and synthesize findings on the association between social capital and psychosis.
Three electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they examined the association between social capital and either diagnosed psychotic disorders or symptoms of psychosis.
Of 191 studies reviewed, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies measured social capital at the ecological level. Seven studies focused on risk of psychotic disorders or symptoms of psychosis, three studies focused on course of psychotic illness, and two studies focused on both risk and course of illness. A variety of social capital measures were used including scales, surveys, and census-based measures. The association between social capital and both the incidence of psychosis and patterns of service use varied based on measures used and study population. There was no association between social capital and recovery or duration of untreated illness.
Prior literature has examined the impact of social capital on the incidence of psychotic disorders, as well as symptoms and course of illness. Based on the scant literature to date, it is difficult to make firm conclusions regarding the role of social capital in psychotic disorders. Heterogeneous measures of social capital make comparisons between studies challenging. Further specificity in measuring and defining dimensions of social capital is required for meaningful study of social capital and its association with psychotic disorders.
KeywordsCourse of illness Incidence Psychosis Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders Scoping review Social capital
This scoping review was not funded by any agencies or institutions.
Sources of funding for included sources: Binbay et al. 2012 – The Scientific and Technological Council of Turkey, Psychiatric Association of Turkey, European Community’s Seventh Framework Program; Drukker et al. 2006 – Maastricht local authorities; Freeman et al. 2011 – Medical Research Council, Department of Health (UK); Heslin et al. 2018 – National Institute for Health Research, Welcome Trust, Royal Society; Kirkbride et al. 2007 – Medical Research Council, Stanley Medical Research Institute; Kirkbride et al. 2008 – Medical Research Council, Welcome Trust, Stanley Medical Research Institute; Lofors & Sundquist 2007 – National Institutes of Health, Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, Swedish Research Council, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Stockholm County Council.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 1.McKenzie K, Harpham T (2006) Social capital and mental health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Putnam Robert D (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Shuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Uphoff EP, Pickett KE, Cabieses B, Small N, Wright J (2013) A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities. Int J Equity Health 12:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-54 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sharma-Gopinath R (2010) Ecological study of psychotic disorders in guam: exploring social risk factors. Alliant International University, California School of Professional Psychology, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- 24.Binbay T, Drukker M, Alptekin K, Elbi H, Tanık FA, Özkınay F et al (2012) Evidence that the wider social environment moderates the association between familial liability and psychosis spectrum outcome. Psychol Med 42(12):2499–2510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712000700 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Statistics Canada (2016) Reasons for not voting in the federal election, October 19, 2015Google Scholar
- 35.Suvisaari J, Opler M, Lindbohm M-L, Sallmén M (2014) Risk of schizophrenia and minority status: a comparison of the Swedish-speaking minority and the Finnish-speaking majority in Finland. Schizophr Res 159(2–3):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 38.Eliacin J (2013) Social capital, narratives of fragmentation, and schizophrenia: an ethnographic exploration of factors shaping African-Caribbeans’ social capital and mental health in a North London community. Cult Med Psychiatry 37(3):465–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-013-9322-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Lora A, Kohn R, Levav I, McBain R, Morris J, Saxena S (2012) Service availability and utilization and treatment gap for schizophrenic disorders: a survey in 50 low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 90:47B–54B. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862012000100012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar