Identifying patterns in psychiatric hospital stays with statistical methods: towards a typology of post-deinstitutionalization hospitalization trajectories
Over the past 50 years, deinstitutionalization changed the face of psychiatry. However, outpatient treatment in the community does not always fit the needs of those who left institutions and sometimes leads to frequent re-hospitalizations, a mechanism known as the “revolving door” phenomenon. The study aim was to identify different typologies of hospitalization trajectories.
Records of 892 inpatients from the Department of Psychiatry of Lausanne University Hospital were analyzed over a 3-year period with discrete sequential-state analysis.
Trajectories could be split between atypical users (4.9% of patients totalling 30.6% of hospital days) and regular users. Within the atypical users group, three categories were identified: “Permanent stays” (3 patients totalling 6.3% of hospital days), “long stays” (1.7% patients/8.6% hospital days) and “revolving door” stays (2.9% patients/15.8% hospital days). The remaining 95.1% of the patients were classified into “unique episodes” (70.0% patients/24.5% hospital days) and “repeated episodes” (25.0% patients/44.9% hospital days). Diagnoses of schizophrenia were overrepresented among heavy users.
Most patients went through a unique or low number of brief hospital admissions over the 3 years of the study. While the shift of previously institutionalized individuals towards high users of psychiatric hospital seems limited, this phenomenon should not be neglected since 4.9% of patients use about a third of hospital beds. Early identification of problematic profiles could allow the implementation of relapse prevention strategies and facilitate the development of alternatives to hospitalization such as assertive community treatment or housing first programs.
KeywordsPsychiatric hospitalization Patterns Revolving door phenomenon Re-hospitalization
This study was based on institutional funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of the study.
- 2.Cohen S (1985) Visions of social control: crime, punishment and classification. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 5.H + . Les Grandes tendances de la psychiatrie (2017). http://www.hplus.ch/fr/chiffres_faits/moniteur_des_hopitaux_et_cliniques_de_h/psychiatrie/. Accessed 15 Sept 2017
- 7.Gabadinho A, Ritschard G, Studer M, Müller NS (2009) Mining sequence data in R with the TraMineR package: a users guide for version 1.2. University of Geneva, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gabadinho A, Ritschard G, Studer M, Müller NS (eds) (2009) Extracting and rendering representative sequences. In: International joint conference on knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering, and knowledge management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 15.Clausen H, Landheim A, Odden S, Šaltytė Benth J, Heiervang KS, Stuen HK et al (2016) Hospitalization of high and low inpatient service users before and after enrollment into Assertive Community Treatment teams: a naturalistic observational study. Int J Ment Health Syst 10(1):14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Golay P, Conus P, Bonsack C (2017) Variabilité des trajectoires d’hospitalisation en psychiatrie : analyses de séquences discrètes. Variability of hospitalization trajectories in psychiatry: discrete sequence analysis. 6èmes Journées MODEVAIIA (MODElisation de la VAriabilité Inter et IntrAindividuelle); MarcevolGoogle Scholar