Advertisement

Diabetologia

, Volume 62, Issue 10, pp 1948–1958 | Cite as

Experimental non-severe hypoglycaemia substantially impairs cognitive function in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial

  • Malin NilssonEmail author
  • Nicole Jensen
  • Michael Gejl
  • Marianne L. Bergmann
  • Heidi Storgaard
  • Mette Zander
  • Kamilla Miskowiak
  • Jørgen Rungby
Article

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between cognitive impairment and hypoglycaemia (<3 mmol/l). This study hypothesised that non-severe insulin-induced hypoglycaemia reduces cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

In this randomised crossover study, 25 participants with type 2 diabetes attended two experimental visits with hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamping: one hypoglycaemic clamp (plasma glucose 3.0 ± 0.2 mmol/l) and one euglycaemic clamp (plasma glucose 6.0 ± 0.2 mmol/l). Participants were eligible if their diabetes was treated with diet or glucose-lowering medications (except sulfonylureas or insulin), age was 35–70 years, BMI was 23–35 kg/m2 and HbA1c was below 75 mmol/mol (9%). Cognitive function was assessed with a neurocognitive test battery measuring verbal memory, executive function, sustained attention and psychomotor speed. From the examined cognitive domains, a global cognition score was constructed estimating global cognition. A measurement for psychomotor speed was selected as the primary outcome. Participants and people assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment.

Results

Cognitive performance was impaired during hypoglycaemia with a mean score in the primary outcome test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test measuring psychomotor speed, of 48.7 ± 9.8 (hypoglycaemia) vs 56.6 ± 12.0 (euglycaemia); i.e. a change of −7.9 points (95% CI −10.9, −4.9; p < 0.0001). In addition, hypoglycaemia reduced global cognitive score by −0.7 (95% CI −0.9, −0.6; p < 0.0001). A stable glucose plateau was achieved during both experimental visits. For the hypoglycaemic clamp, mean plasma glucose concentration (± SD) during neurocognitive testing was 3.1 (± 0.3) mmol/l. Age, sex, fasting C-peptide, counter-regulatory hormones and the severity of hypoglycaemic symptoms did not influence cognitive function.

Conclusions/interpretation

Acute non-severe hypoglycaemia (mean plasma glucose 3.1 mmol/l) has a substantial negative impact on cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03014011.

Funding

The study was supported in part by a research grant from the Investigator Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (MSD-MA-NORD-007-01). The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Funding was also received from Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R. og hustrus Foundation, The Danish Alzheimer Foundation and Savværksejer Jeppe Juhl og hustrus Foundation.

Keywords

Cognitive function Hypoglycaemia Type 2 diabetes 

Abbreviations

ETD

Estimated treatment difference

RAVLT

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

RVP

Rapid Visual Processing

SDMT

Symbol Digit Modalities Test

TMT

Trail Making Test

WAIS-III

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the study participants. They also thank H. Wodschow (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) and the research assistants from the Neurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Group, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Denmark, for assistance during the experimental visits. Thank to I. Brandslund and D. Olsen (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark) for performing the ELISA for glucagon. Finally, thanks to B. Della Valle (GLX Analytix, Copenhagen, Denmark) for proofreading the manuscript.

Contribution statement

MN contributed to trial design, collected the data, performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript. NJ contributed to the statistical analyses, and review and editing of the manuscript. MG, HS and MZ contributed to the study design and interpretation of data and critically reviewed the manuscript. MLB was involved in data analysis and revision of the manuscript. KM adapted the neurocognitive test battery, trained and supervised the research assistants who performed the neurocognitive testing, contributed to the statistical analysis plan and interpretation of results, and revised the manuscript. JR (study sponsor) was responsible for the overall supervision and design of the study, interpretation of data, and review and editing of the manuscript, and made the decision to submit it for publication. All authors approved the final version. JR is responsible for the integrity of the work as a whole.

Funding

The study was supported in part by a research grant from the Investigator Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (MSD-MA-NORD-007-01). The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Funding was also received from Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R. og hustrus Foundation, The Danish Alzheimer Foundation and Savværksejer Jeppe Juhl og hustrus Foundation. The funding sources were not involved in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.

Duality of interest

The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript.

Supplementary material

125_2019_4964_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (242 kb)
ESM (PDF 241 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cryer PE (2002) Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type I and type II diabetes. Diabetologia 45(7):937–948.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-002-0822-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gehlaut RR, Dogbey GY, Schwartz FL, Marling CR, Shubrook JH (2015) Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes—more common than you think: a continuous glucose monitoring study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9(5):999–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815581052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (2017) Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 40(1):155–157.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wild D, von Maltzahn R, Brohan E, Christensen T, Clauson P, Gonder-Frederick L (2007) A critical review of the literature on fear of hypoglycemia in diabetes: implications for diabetes management and patient education. Patient Educ Couns 68(1):10–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis RE, Morrissey M, Peters JR, Wittrup-Jensen K, Kennedy-Martin T, Currie CJ (2005) Impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life and productivity in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 21(9):1477–1483.  https://doi.org/10.1185/030079905X61929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Draelos MT, Jacobson AM, Weinger K et al (1995) Cognitive function in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Am J Med 98(2):135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80397-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deary IJ, Sommerfield AJ, McAulay V, Frier BM (2003) Moderate hypoglycaemia obliterates working memory in humans with and without insulin treated diabetes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(2):278–279.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.2.278-a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McAulay V, Deary IJ, Sommerfield AJ, Frier BM (2006) Attentional functioning is impaired during acute hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 23(1):26–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01795.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gejl M, Gjedde A, Brock B et al (2018) Effects of hypoglycaemia on working memory and regional cerebral blood flow in type 1 diabetes: a randomised, crossover trial. Diabetologia 61(3):551–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4502-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maran A, Crepaldi C, Trupiani S et al (2000) Brain function rescue effect of lactate following hypoglycaemia is not an adaptation process in both normal and type I diabetic subjects. Diabetologia 43(6):733–741.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma L, Wang J, Li Y (2015) Insulin resistance and cognitive dysfunction. Clin Chim Acta 444:18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Warren RE, Frier BM (2005) Hypoglycaemia and cognitive function. Diabetes Obes Metab 7(5):493–503.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00421.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choudhary P, Lonnen K, Emery CJ et al (2009) Comparing hormonal and symptomatic responses to experimental hypoglycaemia in insulin- and sulphonylurea-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 26(7):665–672.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02759.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bremer JP, Baron M, Peters H et al (2006) Hormonal, subjective, and neurocognitive responses to brief hypoglycemia in postmenopausal women and age-matched men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 55(3):331–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2005.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Korzon-Burakowska A, Hopkins D, Matyka K et al (1998) Effects of glycemic control on protective responses against hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 21(2):283–290.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.2.283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spyer G, Hattersley AT, MacDonald IA, Amiel S, MacLeod KM (2000) Hypoglycaemic counter-regulation at normal blood glucose concentrations in patients with well controlled type-2 diabetes. Lancet 356(9246):1970–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03322-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gold AE, Deary IJ, MacLeod KM, Thomson KJ, Frier BM (1995) Cognitive function during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in humans: short-term cerebral adaptation does not occur. Psychopharmacology 119(3):325–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corwin J, Bylsma FW (1993) Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy. Clin Neuropsychol 7(1):3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049308401883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rey A (1964) L’examen clinique en psychologie. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Army Individual Test Battery (1944) Manual of directions and scoring. War Department AGsO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith A (1973) Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Western Psychological Services, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edn. The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Borkowski JG, Benton AL, Spreen O (1967) Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia 5(2):135–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(67)90015-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miskowiak KW, Burdick KE, Martinez-Aran A et al (2017) Methodological recommendations for cognition trials in bipolar disorder by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force. Bipolar Disord 19(8):614–626.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deary IJ, Hepburn DA, MacLeod KM, Frier BM (1993) Partitioning the symptoms of hypoglycaemia using multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis. Diabetologia 36(8):771–777.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koehler G, Heller S, Korsatko S et al (2014) Insulin degludec is not associated with a delayed or diminished response to hypoglycaemia compared with insulin glargine in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind randomised crossover study. Diabetologia 57(1):40–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-3056-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palta P, Schneider AL, Biessels GJ, Touradji P, Hill-Briggs F (2014) Magnitude of cognitive dysfunction in adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of six cognitive domains and the most frequently reported neuropsychological tests within domains. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 20(3):278–291.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617713001483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Worringham CJ, Wood JM, Kerr GK, Silburn PA (2006) Predictors of driving assessment outcome in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 21(2):230–235.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Novak V, Milberg W, Hao Y et al (2014) Enhancement of vasoreactivity and cognition by intranasal insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 37(3):751–759.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kern W, Peters A, Fruehwald-Schultes B, Deininger E, Born J, Fehm HL (2001) Improving influence of insulin on cognitive functions in humans. Neuroendocrinology 74(4):270–280.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000054694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mitrakou A, Ryan C, Veneman T et al (1991) Hierarchy of glycemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone secretion, symptoms, and cerebral dysfunction. Am J Phys 260:E67–E74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu D, Moberg E, Kollind M, Lins PE, Adamson U, Macdonald IA (1992) Arterial, arterialized venous, venous and capillary blood glucose measurements in normal man during hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia 35(3):287–290.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Evans ML, Pernet A, Lomas J, Jones J, Amiel SA (2000) Delay in onset of awareness of acute hypoglycemia and of restoration of cognitive performance during recovery. Diabetes Care 23(7):893–897.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.7.893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Herold KC, Polonsky KS, Cohen RM, Levy J, Douglas F (1985) Variable deterioration in cortical function during insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Diabetes 34(7):677–685.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.34.7.677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zammitt NN, Warren RE, Deary IJ, Frier BM (2008) Delayed recovery of cognitive function following hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: effect of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Diabetes 57(3):732–736.  https://doi.org/10.2337/db07-0695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ryan CM, Freed MI, Rood JA, Cobitz AR, Waterhouse BR, Strachan MW (2006) Improving metabolic control leads to better working memory in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 29(2):345–351.  https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bree AJ, Puente EC, Daphna-Iken D, Fisher SJ (2009) Diabetes increases brain damage caused by severe hypoglycemia. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 297(1):E194–E201.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.91041.2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Whitmer RA, Karter AJ, Yaffe K, Quesenberry CP Jr, Selby JV (2009) Hypoglycemic episodes and risk of dementia in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 301(15):1565–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cheng G, Huang C, Deng H, Wang H (2012) Diabetes as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Intern Med J 42(5):484–491.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02758.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mayeda ER, Whitmer RA, Yaffe K (2015) Diabetes and cognition. Clin Geriatr Med 31(1):101–1ix.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2014.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mehta HB, Mehta V, Goodwin JS (2017) Association of hypoglycemia with subsequent dementia in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 72:1110–1116Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    de Galan BE, Zoungas S, Chalmers J et al (2009) Cognitive function and risks of cardiovascular disease and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. Diabetologia 52(11):2328–2336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1484-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Feinkohl I, Aung PP, Keller M et al (2014) Severe hypoglycemia and cognitive decline in older people with type 2 diabetes: the Edinburgh Type 2 Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 37(2):507–515.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndocrinologyBispebjerg University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of EndocrinologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Biochemistry and ImmunologyUniversity Hospital of Southern DenmarkVejleDenmark
  4. 4.Clinical Metabolic Physiology, Steno Diabetes Center CopenhagenGentofte HospitalHellerupDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Psychology and Mental Health ServicesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  6. 6.Psychiatric Centre CopenhagenRigshospitaletDenmark
  7. 7.Copenhagen Center for Translational ResearchBispebjerg University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations