Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 132, Issue 8, pp 2209–2222 | Cite as

Genetic architecture of tipburn resistance in lettuce

  • M. Macias-González
  • M. J. Truco
  • L. D. Bertier
  • S. Jenni
  • I. Simko
  • R. J. Hayes
  • R. W. MichelmoreEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Two major QTLs for tipburn were identified in LGs 1 and 5 contributing to resistance in cv. Salinas. The findings suggest pleiotropic effects between leaf crinkliness/savoy and tipburn.

Abstract

Tipburn is a physiological disorder in lettuce that is thought to be caused by a localized deficiency of calcium in leaf tissues. To elucidate the genetic architecture of resistance to tipburn in lettuce, seven recombinant inbred line populations were analyzed in multiple environments and years to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for tipburn. Core height, head firmness, head closure, leaf crinkliness, plant fresh weight, and leaf savoy were also analyzed to investigate whether QTLs for these morphological traits collocated with QTLs for tipburn, which would be indicative of pleiotropic effects. Twenty-three major, intermediate, and minor unique QTLs for tipburn were identified in one or more populations scattered throughout the genome. Two major QTLs for tipburn incidence were identified in linkage groups (LGs) 1 and 5, which determined up to 45 and 66% of the phenotypic variance. The major QTL in LG 1 collocated with the head firmness QTL. The major QTL in LG 5 collocated with the QTL for core height, leaf crinkliness, and head firmness. Further research is needed to determine whether these associations are due to pleiotropic effects of the same gene or if the genes determining these traits are tightly linked. The beneficial alleles at the QTLs in LGs 1 and 5 are present in Lactuca sativa cv. Salinas, the genotype sequenced for the reference genome assembly. Therefore, these QTLs are good targets to identify genes causing tipburn as well as regions for marker-assisted selection to improve resistance to tipburn in lettuce.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to members of the Michelmore lab, USDA-ARS Salinas Crop Improvement and Protection Research Unit, and University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center for their help in conducting and collecting data for some of these experiments. This work was supported by the California Leafy Greens Research Program (2010-51181-21631) and the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Specialty Crop Research Initiative program award (2015-51181-24283).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

122_2019_3349_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3379 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson LD, McHale LK, Truco MJ, Hilton HW, Lynn J, Schut JW, Michelmore RW, Hand P, Pink DAC (2013) An intra-specific linkage map of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and genetic analysis of postharvest discolouration traits. Theor Appl Genet 126(11):2737–2752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barta DJ, Tibbitts TW (1986) Effects of artificial enclosure of young lettuce Lactuca sativa cultivar Buttercrunch leaves on tipburn incidence and leaf calcium concentration. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111(3):413–416Google Scholar
  3. Barta DJ, Tibbitts TW (1991) Calcium localization in lettuce leaves with and without tipburn: comparison of controlled-environment and field-grown plants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116(5):870–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barta DJ, Tibbitts TW (2000) Calcium localization and tipburn development in lettuce leaves during early enlargement. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125(3):294–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates DM, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertier LD, Ron M, Huo H, Bradford KJ, Michelmore RW (2018) High-resolution analysis of the efficiency, heritability, and editing outcomes of CRISPR/CAS9-induced modifications of NCED4 in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). G3 Genes Genomes Genet 8(5):1513–1521.  https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300396 Google Scholar
  7. Broman KW (2012) Genetic map construction with R/qtl, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  8. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19:889–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brumm I, Schenk M (1993) Influence of nitrogen supply on the occurrence of calcium deficiency in field grown lettuce. Acta Hortic 339:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke JM, Tang S, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH (2002) Genetic analysis of sunflower domestication. Genetics 161(3):1257–1267Google Scholar
  11. CDFA (2016) California agricultural statistics reviewGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi K, Lee Y (2008) Effects of relative humidity on the apparent variability in the incidence of tipburn symptom and distribution of mineral nutrients between morphologically different Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 49:20–24Google Scholar
  13. Clarkson DT (1984) Calcium transport between tissues and its distribution in the plant. Plant Cell Environ 7:449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corriveau J, Gaudreau L, Caron J, Jenni S, Gosselin A (2012) Testing irrigation, day/night foliar spraying, foliar calcium and growth inhibitor as possible cultural practices to reduce tipburn in lettuce. Can J Plant Sci 92(5):889–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson IB, Bollard EG (1976) The movement of calcium in woody stems. Ann Bot 40:1057–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frantz JM, Ritchie G, Cometti NN, Robinson J, Bugbee B (2004) Exploring the limits of crop productivity: beyond the limits of tipburn in lettuce. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129(3):331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilliham M, Dayod M, Hocking BJ, Xu B, Conn SJ, Kaiser BN, Leigh RA, Tyerman SD (2011) Calcium delivery and storage in plant leaves: exploring the link with water flow. J Exp Bot 62(7):2233–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F, Harriman J, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, Buckler ES (2014) TASSEL-GBS: a high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS ONE 9(2):e90346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadfield J (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33(2):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartz TK, Johnstone PR, Smith RF, Cahn MD (2007) Soil calcium status unrelated to tipburn of romaine lettuce. HortScience 42(7):1681–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes RJ, Maruthachalam K, Vallad GE, Klosterman SJ, Simko I, Luo Y, Subbarao KV (2011a) Iceberg lettuce breeding lines with resistance to verticillium wilt caused by race 1 isolates of Verticillium dahliae. HortScience 46(3):501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayes RJ, McHale LK, Vallad GE, Truco MJ, Michelmore RW, Klosterman SJ, Maruthachalam K, Subbarao KV (2011b) The inheritance of resistance to verticillium wilt caused by race 1 isolates of Verticillium dahliae in the lettuce cultivar La Brillante. Theor Appl Genet 123(4):509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes RJ, Galeano CH, Antonise R, Simko I (2014) Inheritance of decay of fresh-cut lettuce in a recombinant inbred line population from “Salinas 88” × “La Brillante”. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 139(4):388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holtschulze M (2005) Tipburn in head lettuce: the role of calcium and strategies for preventing the disorder. MSc thesis, University of BonnGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenni S, Hayes RJ (2010) Genetic variation, genotype × environment interaction, and selection for tipburn resistance in lettuce in multi-environments. Euphytica 171(3):427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenni S, Truco MJ, Michelmore RW (2013) Quantitative trait loci associated with tipburn, heat stress-induced physiological disorders, and maturity traits in crisphead lettuce. Theor Appl Genet 126(12):3065–3079.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2193-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerton M, Newbury HJ, Hand D, Pritchard J (2009) Accumulation of calcium in the centre of leaves of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) is due to an uncoupling of water and ion transport. J Exp Bot 60(1):227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkby EA, Pilbeam DJ (1984) Calcium as a plant nutrient. Plant Cell Environ 7:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li J, Ji L (2005) Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity 95:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Macias-González M (2018) On the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency, water use efficiency, and tipburn of lettuce (Lactuca sativa): from QTLs to candidate genes. Dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  31. Mathews K, Murray D, Van Eeuwijk F, Welham S (2015) Genstat QTL analysis a guide to QTL analysis in Genstat®. http://cdn.vsni.co.uk/downloads/genstat/release18/doc/QTLGuide.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2017
  32. Misaghi IJ, Grogan RG (1978) Effect of temperature on tipburn development in head lettuce. Phytopathology 68:1738–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nath U (2003) Genetic control of surface curvature. Science 299(5611):1404–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olle M, Bender I (2009) Causes and control of calcium deficiency disorders in vegetables: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 84(6):577–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palatnik JF, Allen E, Wu X, Schommer C, Schwab R, Carrington JC, Weigel D (2003) Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 425(6955):257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palzkill D, Tibbitts R (1977) Evidence that root pressure flow is required for calcium transport to head leaves of cabbage. Plant Physiol 60(6):854–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Payne R, Murray D, Harding S (2015) Genstat for windows, 18th edn. VSNi, Hemel Hempstead, pp 1–133Google Scholar
  38. Plummer M (2006) CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6(1):7–11Google Scholar
  39. Reyes-Chin-Wo S, Wang Z, Yang X, Kozik A, Arikit S, Song C, Xia L, Froenicke L, Lavelle DO, Truco MJ, Xia R, Zhu S, Xu C, Xu H, Xu X, Cox K, Korf I, Meyers BC, Michelmore RW (2017) Genome assembly with in vitro proximity ligation data and whole-genome triplication in lettuce. Nat Commun 8:14953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodriguez RE, Mecchia MA, Debernardi JM, Schommer C, Weigel D, Palatnik JF (2010) Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development 137(1):103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russel L, Love J, Herve M (2017) Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. https://githum.com/rvlenth/emmeans/issues. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  42. Ryder EJ (1979) “Salinas” lettuce. HortScience 14:283–284Google Scholar
  43. Ryder EJ (1991) “Salinas 88” lettuce. HortScience 26(4):439–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ryder EJ, Waycott W (1998) Crisphead lettuce resistant to tipburn: cultivar tiber and eight breeding lines. HortScience 33(5):903–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schommer C, Debernardi JM, Bresso EG, Rodriguez RE, Palatnik JF (2014) Repression of cell proliferation by miR319-regulated TCP4. Mol Plant 7(10):1533–1544.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Searle SR, Speed FM, Milliken GA (1980) Population marginal means in the linear model: alternative to least squares means. Am Stat 34(4):216–221Google Scholar
  47. Simko I, Pechenick DA, McHale LK, Truco M, Ochoa OE, Michelmore RW, Scheffler BE (2009) Association mapping and marker-assisted selection of the lettuce dieback resistance gene Tvr1. BMC Plant Biol 9(135):1–16Google Scholar
  48. Simko I, Hayes RJ, Truco MJ, Michelmore RW (2011) Mapping a dominant negative mutation for triforine sensitivity in lettuce and its use as a selectable marker for detecting hybrids. Euphytica 182(2):157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simko I, Atallah AJ, Ochoa OE, Antonise R, Galeano CH, Truco MJ, Michelmore RW (2013) Identification of QTLs conferring resistance to downy mildew in legacy cultivars of lettuce. Sci Rep 3:2875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simko I, Ochoa O, Pel MA, Tsuchida C, Fonti Forcada C, Hayes RJ, Truco MJ, Antonise R, Galeano CH, Michelmore RW (2015) Resistance to downy mildew in lettuce cv. La Brillante is conferred by Dm50 gene and multiple QTLs. Phytopathology 105(8):1220–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  52. Truco MJ, Antonise R, Lavelle D, Ochoa O, Kozik A, Witsenboer H, Fort SB, Jeuken MJW, Kesseli RV, Lindhout P, Michelmore RW, Peleman J (2007) A high-density, integrated genetic linkage map of lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Theor Appl Genet 115(6):735–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Truco MJ, Ashrafi H, Kozik A, van Leeuwen H, Bowers J, Reyes–Chin–Wo S, Stoffel K, Xu H, Hill T, Van Deynze A, Michelmore RW (2013) An ultra high-density, transcript-based, genetic map of lettuce. G3 (Bethesda) 3:617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United States Department of Agriculture (1993) Plant variety protection Certificate No. 9300014 for El Dorado. Agricultural Marketing ServiceGoogle Scholar
  55. USDA-NASS (2016) Chapter IV statistics of vegetables and melons. In: Agricultural statistics 2016, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  56. van de Geijn SC, Smeulders F (1981) Diurnal changes in the flux of calcium toward meristems and transpiring leaves in tomato and maize plants. Planta 151(3):265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van de Geijn SC, Petit CM, Roelofsen H (1979) Measurement of the cation exchange capacity of the transport system in intact plant stems methodology and preliminary results. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 10(1/2):225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Oijen JW (2006) JoinMap®4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma B.V., WageningenGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB (2012) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2017
  60. Weller JI, Soller M (2004) An analytical formula to estimate confidence interval of QTL location with a saturated genetic map as a function of experimental design. Theor Appl Genet 109(6):1224–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. White PJ (2001) The pathways of calcium movement to the xylem. J Exp Bot 52(358):891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White PJ, Broadley MR (2003) Calcium in plants. Ann Bot 92(4):487–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Macias-González
    • 1
    • 6
  • M. J. Truco
    • 1
  • L. D. Bertier
    • 1
  • S. Jenni
    • 3
  • I. Simko
    • 4
  • R. J. Hayes
    • 5
  • R. W. Michelmore
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.The Genome CenterUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.Science and Technology BranchAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSaint-Jean-Sur-RichelieuCanada
  4. 4.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research ServiceU.S. Agricultural Research StationSalinasUSA
  5. 5.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research SecorrectlyrviceForage Seed and Cereal Research UnitCorvallisUSA
  6. 6.Enza Zaden North America ResearchInc - San Juan BautistaSan Juan BautistaUSA

Personalised recommendations