Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 883–893 | Cite as

Fine mapping of qGL5H, a major grain length locus in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

  • Calum Watt
  • Gaofeng Zhou
  • Lee-Anne McFawn
  • Kenneth James Chalmers
  • Chengdao LiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

A major grain length QTL on chromosome 5H was fine mapped from 180.5 to 1.7 Mb.

Abstract

Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) mapping has been used extensively in barley to detect QTLs that underlie complex traits such as grain size. In the present study, we utilised 312 double haploid lines derived from a cross between two Australian malting varieties, Vlamingh and Buloke, to dissect the genetic control of a number of grain size characteristics. Digital image analysis was used to measure grain size characteristics including length, width, thickness and plumpness which are important traits influencing barley yield and grain physical quality. Using data from four independent environments and molecular marker genotype data, we identified 23 significant QTLs for these four traits, ten of which were consensus QTLs and identified in two or more environments. A QTL region on chromosome 5H designated qGL5H that was associated with grain size was fine mapped to a 1.7 Mb interval. qGL5H was able to explain 21.6% of phenotypic variation for grain length within the population. This major QTL is an appropriate candidate for further genetic dissection.

Abbreviations

MET

Multi-environment trial

BLUP

Best linear unbiased prediction

DArT

Diversity array technology

InDel

Insertion–deletion

MQM

Multi-QTL mapping

QTL

Quantitative trait loci

CIM

Composite interval mapping

PCA

Principle component analysis

ari-e

A semi-dwarf gene from Golden Promise

DH

Double haploid

V

Vlamingh

B

Buloke

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted with funding support (UMU00049) from the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC). Sue Broughton from DPIRD developed the doubled haploid population. Research was not possible without help from the Western Barley Genetics Alliance and Murdoch University whom provided facilities and expertise.

Compliance with ethical standards

This article is submitted in compliance with the ethical standards of Theoretical and Applied genetics.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

122_2018_3243_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13 kb)
122_2018_3243_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 1442 kb)
122_2018_3243_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (32 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 32 kb)

References

  1. Abdel-Haleem H, Bowman JGP, Kanazin V, Surber L, Talbert H, Hayes PM, Blake T (2010) Quantitative trait loci for dry matter digestibility and particle size traits in two-rowed × six-rowed barley population. Euphytica 172:419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agu RC, Brosnan JM, Bringhurst TA, Palmer GH, Jack FR (2007) Influence of corn size distribution on the diastatic power of malted barley and its impact on other malt quality parameters. J Agric Food Chem 55:3702–3707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed I, Islam M, Arshad W, Mannan A, Ahmad W, Mirza B (2009) High-quality plant DNA extraction for PCR: an easy approach. J Appl Genet 50:105–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayoub M, Symons SS, Edney MM, Mather DD (2002) QTLs affecting kernel size and shape in a two-rowed by six-rowed barley cross. Theor Appl Genet 105:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang C, Lu J, Zhang HP, Ma CX, Sun G (2015) Copy number variation of cytokinin oxidase gene Tackx4 associated with grain weight and chlorophyll content of flag leaf in common wheat. PLoS ONE 10:e0145970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coventry SJ, Barr AR, Eglinton JK, McDonald GK (2003) The determinants and genome locations influencing grain weight and size in barley. Aust J Agric Res 54:1103–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis RP, Forster BP, Gordon DC, Handley LL, Keith RP, Lawrence P, Meyer R, Powell W, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Young G, Thomas WTB (2002) Phenotype/genotype associations for yield and salt tolerance in a barley mapping population segregating for two dwarfing genes. J Exp Bot 53:1163–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emebiri LC (2013) QTL dissection of the loss of green colour during post-anthesis grain maturation in two-rowed barley. Theor Appl Genet 126:1873–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan C, Xing Yongzhong, Mao Hailiang, Tingting Lu, Han Bin, Caiguo Xu, Li Xianghua, Zhang Q (2006) GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet 112:1164–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAOSTAT (2017) Worldwide cereal production comparisons. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database. http://www.fao.org/faostat. Accessed 8th Feb 2018
  11. Jia Q, Tan C, Wang J, Zhang X-Q, Zhu J, Luo H, Yang J, Westcott S, Broughton S, Moody D, Li C (2016) Marker development using SLAF-seq and whole-genome shotgun strategy to fine-map the semi-dwarf gene ari-e in barley. BMC Genom 17:911–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai Y, Yu Y, Liu X, Wan H, Zhang Z, Wang L, Leng Y, Ma L, Yang W, Feng Z (2017) Association mapping of grain weight, length and width in barley (Hordeum vulgare) breeding germplasm. Int J Agric Biol 19:1175–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li N, Xu R, Duan P, Li Y (2018) Control of grain size in rice. Plant Reprod 31:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marquez-Cedillo LA, Hayes PM, Jones BL, Kleinhofs A, Legge WG, Rossnagel BG, Sato K, Ullrich SE, Wesenberg DM, Project NABGM (2000) QTL analysis of malting quality in barley based on the doubled-haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theor Appl Genet 101:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mascher M, Gundlach H, Himmelbach A, Beier S, Twardziok SO, Wicker T, Radchuk V, Dockter C, Hedley PE, Russell J, Bayer M, Ramsay L, Liu H, Haberer G, Zhang X-Q, Zhang Q, Barrero RA, Li L, Taudien S, Groth M, Felder M, Hastie A, Šimková H, Staňková H, Vrána J, Chan S, Muñoz-Amatriaín M, Ounit R, Wanamaker S, Bolser D, Colmsee C, Schmutzer T, Aliyeva-Schnorr L, Grasso S, Tanskanen J, Chailyan A, Sampath D, Heavens D, Clissold L, Cao S, Chapman B, Dai F, Han Y, Li H, Li X, Lin C, McCooke JK, Tan C, Wang P, Wang S, Yin S, Zhou G, Poland JA, Bellgard MI, Borisjuk L, Houben A, Doležel J, Ayling S, Lonardi S, Kersey P, Langridge P, Muehlbauer GJ, Clark MD, Caccamo M, Schulman AH, Mayer KFX, Platzer M, Close TJ, Scholz U, Hansson M, Zhang G, Braumann I, Spannagl M, Li C, Waugh R, Stein N (2017) A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mather DE, Tinker NA, LaBerge DE, Edney M, Jones BL, Rossnagel BG, Legge WG, Briggs KG, Irvine RB, Falk DE, Kasha KJ (1997) Regions of the genome that affect grain and malt quality in a North American two-row barley cross. Crop Sci 37:544–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matthies IE, van Hintum T, Weise S, Röder MS (2012) Population structure revealed by different marker types (SSR or DArT) has an impact on the results of genome-wide association mapping in European barley cultivars. Mol Breed 30:951–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paynter B, Young K (2001) Morphological traits associated with grain plumpness of barley grown in Western Australia. Paper presented at the 10th Australian Barley technical symposium, Canberra, ACT, September 2001Google Scholar
  19. Rabiei B, Valizadeh M, Ghareyazie B, Moghaddam M, Ali AJ (2004) Identification of QTLs for rice grain size and shape of Iranian cultivars using SSR markers. Euphytica 137:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sadeghzadeh B, Rengel Z, Li C, Ha Yang (2010) Molecular marker linked to a chromosome region regulating seed Zn accumulation in barley. Mol Breed 25:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Segami S, Yamamoto T, Oki K, Noda T, Kanamori H, Sasaki H, Mori S, Ashikari M, Kitano H, Katayose Y, Iwasaki Y, Miura K (2016) Detection of novel QTLs regulating grain size in extra-large grain rice (Oryza sativa L.) lines. Rice 9:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shirdelmoghanloo H, Taylor JD, Lohraseb I, Rabie H, Brien C, Timmins A, Martin P, Mather DE, Emebiri L, Collins NC (2016) A QTL on the short arm of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chromosome 3B affects the stability of grain weight in plants exposed to a brief heat shock early in grain filling. BMC Plant Biol 16:100–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun L, Ma D, Yu H, Zhou F, Li Y, Luo L, Gao G, Zhang Q, Xu C, He Y (2013) Identification of quantitative trait loci for grain size and the contributions of major grain-size QTLs to grain weight in rice. Mol Breed 31:451–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun S, Wang L, Mao H, Shao L, Li X, Xiao J, Ouyang Y, Zhang Q (2018) A G-protein pathway determines grain size in rice. Nat Commun 9:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG (2012) Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucl Acids Res 40:e115–e115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vafadar Shamasbi F, Jamali SH, Sadeghzadeh B, Abdollahi Mandoulakani B (2017) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-affecting traits in a barley doubled haploid population derived from clipper × sahara 3771. Front Plant Sci 8:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van Ooijen J, Kyazma B (2011) MapQTL, Version 6.0: Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations of diploid species. Wageningen, CPRO-DLOGoogle Scholar
  28. Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93:77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker CK, Panozzo JF (2016) Genetic characterisation, expression and association of quality traits and grain texture in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Euphytica 212:157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker CK, Ford R, Munoz-Amatriam M, Panozzo JF (2013) The detection of QTLs in barley associated with endosperm hardness, grain density, grain size and malting quality using rapid phenotyping tools. Theor Appl Genet 126:2533–2551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wendt T, Holme I, Dockter C, Preuß A, Thomas W, Druka A, Waugh R, Hansson M, Braumann I (2016) HvDep1 is a positive regulator of culm elongation and grain size in barley and impacts yield in an environment-dependent manner. PLoS ONE 11:e0168924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu Q-H, Chen Y-X, Zhou S-H, Fu L, Chen J-J, Xiao Y, Zhang D, Ouyang S-H, Zhao X-J, Cui Y, Zhang D-Y, Liang Y, Wang Z-Z, Xie J-Z, Qin J-X, Wang G-X, Li D-L, Huang Y-L, Yu M-H, Lu P, Wang L-L, Wang L, Wang H, Dang C, Li J, Zhang Y, Peng H-R, Yuan C-G, You M-S, Sun Q-X, Wang J-R, Wang L-X, Luo M-C, Han J, Liu Z-Y (2015) High-density genetic linkage map construction and QTL mapping of grain shape and size in the wheat population Yanda 1817 × Beinong6. PLoS ONE 10:e0118144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xing Y, Zhang Q (2010) Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:421–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Barley Genetic AllianceMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Western Australian State Agricultural Biotechnology CentreMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  3. 3.School of Agriculture, Food and WineUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Primary Industry and Regional DevelopmentPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations