Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 383–394 | Cite as

Lessons from natural variations: artificially induced heading date variations for improvement of regional adaptation in rice

  • Yong Hu
  • Shuangle Li
  • Yongzhong XingEmail author
Original Article


Key message

New strategy of breeding by modulating key heading date gene Ehd1 to enhance the variations of heading date regardless of genetic background for better adaptation to local environment in rice.


Flowering time (or heading date) is an important quantitative trait in rice (Oryza sativa) that determines its adaptation to specific cultivation areas and growing seasons. However, breeding of flowering time is currently relying on laborious selections and combinations of different alleles of various genes. Here, we cloned a cis-variant allele of Ehd1 that regulated not only heading date but also yield potential. Genetic analysis revealed that Ehd1 acted downstream of Ghd7 as a negative regulator of yield potential, and expression divergence of Ehd1 negatively correlates with phenotype variations including heading date and grain yield. Moreover, regardless of genetic background, manipulations of the expression of a single gene, Ehd1, are sufficient for recreating beneficial heading date variations which could be subjected to the selection of best suitable lines for local environment conditions. Beyond a deeper understanding of transcriptional control of quantitative traits, this study provided an effective and flexible strategy for breeding rice cultivars to maximize grain production for any region of cultivation.



We are grateful to Dr. Yunde Zhao for the kind donation of vectors for CRISPR. This study was supported by the National Special Program for Transgenic Plant Research of China (2011ZX08009-001-002), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0100301), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571751).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

122_2018_3225_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1835 kb)


  1. Cho L-H, Yoon J, Pasriga R, An G (2016) Homodimerization of Ehd1 is required to induce flowering in rice. Plant Physiol 01723.02015Google Scholar
  2. Deng L et al (2017) Suppressor of rid1 (SID1) shares common targets with RID1 on florigen genes to initiate floral transition in rice. PLoS Genet 13:e1006642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doi K et al (2004) Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev 18:926–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gao H et al (2013) Ehd4 encodes a novel and Oryza-genus-specific regulator of photoperiodic flowering in rice. PLoS Genet 9:e1003281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao H et al (2014) Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:16337–16342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang R-Y, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6:343–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gómez-Ariza J et al (2015) Loss of floral repressor function adapts rice to higher latitudes in Europe. J Exp Bot erv004Google Scholar
  8. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hori K, Matsubara K, Yano M (2016) Genetic control of flowering time in rice: integration of Mendelian genetics and genomics. Theor Appl Genet 1–12Google Scholar
  10. Huang X et al (2012) A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 490:497–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Itoh H, Nonoue Y, Yano M, Izawa T (2010) A pair of floral regulators sets critical day length for Hd3a florigen expression in rice. Nat Genet 42:635–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koo B-H et al (2013) Natural variation in OsPRR37 regulates heading date and contributes to rice cultivation at a wide range of latitudes. Mol Plant 6:1877–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kovi MR, Hu Y, Bai X, Xing Y (2015) QTL mapping for thermo-sensitive heading date in rice. Euphytica 205:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee YS et al (2010) OsCOL4 is a constitutive flowering repressor upstream of Ehd1 and downstream of OsphyB. Plant J 63:18–30Google Scholar
  15. Lei Y, Lu L, Liu H-Y, Li S, Xing F, Chen L-L (2014) CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol Plant 7:1494–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu H, Gu F, Dong S, Liu W, Wang H, Chen Z, Wang J (2016a) CONSTANS-like 9 (COL9) delays the flowering time in Oryza sativa by repressing the Ehd1 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 479:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu J, Shen J, Xu Y, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L (2016b) Ghd2, a CONSTANS-like gene, confers drought sensitivity through regulation of senescence in rice. J Exp Bot 67:5785–5798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nemoto Y, Nonoue Y, Yano M, Izawa T (2016) Hd1, a CONSTANS ortholog in rice, functions as an Ehd1 repressor through interaction with monocot-specific CCT-domain protein Ghd7. Plant J 86:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okada R, Nemoto Y, Endo-Higashi N, Izawa T (2017) Synthetic control of flowering in rice independent of the cultivation environment. Nat Plants 3:17039. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodriguez-Leal D, Lemmon ZH, Man J, Bartlett ME, Lippman ZB (2017) Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell 171:470–480.e478. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sheng P et al (2016) A CONSTANS-like transcriptional activator, OsCOL13, functions as a negative regulator of flowering downstream of OsphyB and upstream of Ehd1 in rice. Plant Mol Biol 92:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shrestha R, Gómez-Ariza J, Brambilla V, Fornara F (2014) Molecular control of seasonal flowering in rice, arabidopsis and temperate cereals. Ann Bot 114:1445–1458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun Y et al (2016) Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase. Mol Plant 9:628–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Takahashi Y, Teshima KM, Yokoi S, Innan H, Shimamoto K (2009) Variations in Hd1 proteins, Hd3a promoters, and Ehd1 expression levels contribute to diversity of flowering time in cultivated rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:4555–4560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tan J et al (2016) OsCOL10, a CONSTANS-like gene, functions as a flowering time repressor downstream of Ghd7 in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 57:798–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei X et al (2010) DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol 153:1747–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weng X et al (2014) Grain number, plant height, and heading date7 is a central regulator of growth, development, and stress response. Plant Physiol 164:735–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wittkopp PJ, Kalay G (2011) Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat Rev Genet 13:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu W et al (2013) Association of functional nucleotide polymorphisms at DTH2 with the northward expansion of rice cultivation in Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2775–2780. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xue W et al (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40:761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yan W et al (2014) Natural variation in Ghd7. 1 plays an important role in grain yield and adaptation in rice. Cell Res 23:2013, 2023 (2017): 2969–2971Google Scholar
  32. Yan W-H et al (2011) A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol Plant 4:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang Y, Luo L, Xu C, Zhang Q, Xing Y (2006) Quantitative trait loci for panicle size, heading date and plant height co-segregating in trait-performance derived near-isogenic lines of rice (Oryza sativa). Theor Appl Genet 113:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang J et al (2015) Combinations of the Ghd7, Ghd8 and Hd1 genes largely define the ecogeographical adaptation and yield potential of cultivated rice. New Phytol 208:1056–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang Z et al (2017) Alternative functions of Hd1 in repressing or promoting heading are determined by Ghd7 status under long-day conditions. Sci Rep 7:5388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao J et al (2015) Genetic interactions between diverged alleles of early heading date 1 (Ehd1) and Heading date 3a (Hd3a)/RICE FLOWERING LOCUS T1 (RFT1) control differential heading and contribute to regional adaptation in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol 208:936–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and the National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan)Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations