Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Fine mapping of a dominant gene conferring resistance to spot blotch caused by a new pathotype of Bipolaris sorokiniana in barley

  • Rui Wang
  • Yueqiang Leng
  • Mingxia Zhao
  • Shaobin Zhong
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

We fine-mapped and physically anchored a dominant gene (Rbs7) conferring resistance to spot blotch caused by a new pathotype of Bipolaris sorokiniana in a genomic interval of 304 kb on barley chromosome 6H.

Abstract

Spot blotch, caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana, is an economically important disease on barley in the Upper Midwest region of the USA and Prairie Provinces of Canada. A new pathotype (pathotype 7, represented by isolate ND4008) of B. sorokiniana has been identified, which is highly virulent on barley cultivars with resistance to other pathotypes of the fungus. In this study, we fine-mapped a dominant gene conferring resistance to pathotype 7 in the barley line PI 235186. Genetic analysis of the F1 and F2 plants from a cross between PI 356741 (highly susceptible to ND4008) and PI 235186 (highly resistant to ND4008) indicated that a single dominant gene (Rbs7) controls the resistance in PI 235186. This result was confirmed by genetic analysis of the F2:3 families and a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from the same cross. Bulked segregant analysis using simple sequence repeat markers localized Rbs7 on the short arm of chromosome 6H. Additional DNA markers were developed from the 6H pseudomolecule sequence of barley cv. Morex and mapped to the genomic region carrying Rbs7 using the RIL population and F2 recombinants derived from the PI 356741 × PI 235186 cross. Rbs7 was fine-mapped between two markers (M13.06 and M13.37), which spans a physical distance of 304 kb on Morex chromosome 6H. These results provide a foundation for future cloning of the resistance gene and development of user-friendly molecular markers that can be used for development of spot-blotch-resistant cultivars in barley breeding programs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Joseph Mullins, Qiang Li, and Yue Zhou for assistance in greenhouse planting and phenotyping experiments, and Dr. Shiaoman Chao for providing the primers for the SSR markers. This research was funded by the Triticeae-CAP Project (2011-68002-30029) of the US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Author contribution statement

SZ and RW conceived the experiments. RW, YL, MZ, and SZ designed the experiments. RW made the cross between PI 356741 and PI 235186, generated F1, F2, F2:3 families, and RILs, and performed BSA with SSR markers. RW, YL, and MZ developed CAPS markers and genotyped the mapping populations. YL, RW, MZ, and SZ analyzed the data. RW, YL, and SZ wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical standards

The authors state that all experiments in the study comply with the ethical standards in the USA.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

122_2018_3192_MOESM1_ESM.docx (40 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 40 kb)
122_2018_3192_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 22 kb)
122_2018_3192_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 18 kb)

References

  1. Ameen G, Drader T, Sager L, Steffenson BJ, Kleinhofs A, Brueggeman RS (2016) Rcs5 is a wall associated kinase gene that putatively functions as a dominant susceptibility factor in the barley-Cochliobolus sativus interaction. In: The 12th international barley genetics symposium, 26–30 June 2016, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabi MIE, Jawhar M (2004) Identification of Cochliobolus sativus (spot blotch) isolates expressing differential virulence on barley genotypes in Syria. J Phytopathol 152:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer MM, Rapazote-Flores P, Ganal M et al (2017) Development and evaluation of a barley 50 k iSelect SNP array. Front Plant Sci 8:1792.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01792 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger GL, Liu S, Hall MD, Brooks WS, Chao S, Muehlbauer GJ, Baik BK, Steffenson B, Griffey CA (2013) Marker-trait associations in Virginia Tech winter barley identified using genome-wide mapping. Theor Appl Genet 126:693–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilgic H, Steffenson BJ, Hayes PM (2005) Comprehensive genetic analyses reveal differential expression of spot blotch resistance in four populations of barley. Theor Appl Genet 111:1238–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilgic H, Steffenson BJ, Hayes PM (2006) Molecular mapping of loci conferring resistance to different pathotypes of the spot blotch pathogen in barley. Phytopathology 96:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bovill J, Lehmensiek A, Sutherland MW, Platz GJ, Usher T, Franck-owiak J, Mace E (2010) Mapping spot blotch resistance genes in four barley populations. Mol Breed 26:653–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandwagt BF, Mesbah LA, Takken FL, Laurent PL, Kneppers TJ, Hille J, Nijkamp HJ (2000) A longevity assurance gene homolog of tomato mediates resistance to Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici toxins and fumonisin B1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4961–4966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlsen SA, Neupane A, Wyatt NA, Richards JK, Faris JD, Xu SS, Brueggeman RS, Friesen TL (2017) Characterizing the Pyrenophora teres f. maculata-barley interaction using pathogen genetics. G3-Genes Genom Genet 7:2615–2626Google Scholar
  10. Castro AJ, Gamba F, German S, Gonzalez S, Hayes PM, Pereyra S, Perez C (2012) Quantitative trait locus analysis of spot blotch and leaf rust resistance in the BCD47 Baronesse barley mapping population. Plant Breed 131:258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciuffetti LM, Manning VA, Pandelova I, Betts MF, Martinez JP (2010) Host-selective toxins, Ptr ToxA and Ptr ToxB, as necrotrophic effectors in the Pyrenophora tritici-repentis-wheat interaction. New Phytol 187:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colmsee C, Beier S, Himmelbach A, Schmutzer T, Stein N, Scholz U, Mascher M (2015) BARLEX—the barley draft genome explorer. Mol Plant 8:964–966.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Condon BJ, Leng Y, Wu D, Bushley KE, Ohm RA, Otillar R, Martin J, Schackwitz W, Grimwood J, MohdZainudin N, Xue C, Wang R, Manning VA, Dhillon B, Tu ZJ, Steffenson BJ, Salamov A, Sun H, Lowry S, LaButti K, Han J, Copeland A, Lindquist E, Barry K, Schmutz J, Baker SE, Ciuffetti LM, Grigoriev IV, Zhong S, Turgeon BG (2013) Comparative genome structure, secondary metabolite, and effector coding capacity across Cochliobolus pathogens. PLoS Genet 9(1):e1003233.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003233 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Courtois-Moreau CL, Pesquet E, Sjodin A, Muniz L, Bollhoner B, Kaneda M, Samuels L, Jansson S, Tuominen H (2009) A unique program for cell death in xylem fibers of Populus stem. Plant J 58:260–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drader TB (2011) Cloning of the seedling spot blotch resistance gene Rcs5. Ph.D. thesis, Washington State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Faris JD, Zhang Z, Lu H, Lu S, Reddy L, Cloutier S et al (2010) A unique wheat disease resistance-like gene governs effector-trig- gered susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:13544–13549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrow SC, Facchini PJ (2014) Functional diversity of 2-oxoglutarate/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases in plant metabolism. Front Plant Sci 5:524.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00524 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fetch TG Jr, Steffenson BJ (1999) Rating scales for assessing infection responses of barley infected with Cochliobolus sativus. Plant Dis 83:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friesen TL, Faris JD, Solomon PS, Oliver RP (2008) Host-specific toxins: effectors of necrotrophic pathogenicity. Cell Microbiol 10:1421–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghazvini H, Tekauz A (2007) Virulence diversity in the population of Cochliobolus sativus. Plant Dis 91:814–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grewal TS, Rossnagel BG, Scoles GJ (2012) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with spot blotch and net blotch resistance in a doubled-haploid barley population. Mol Breed 30:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guzmán P (2012) The prolific ATL family of RING-H2 ubiquitin ligases. Plant Signal Behav 7:1014–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gyawali S (2010) Association mapping of resistance to common root rot and spot blotch in barley, and population genetics of Cochliobolus sativus. Ph.D. Dissertation. North Dakota State University, Fargo, NDGoogle Scholar
  24. Gyawali S, Chao S, Vaish SS et al (2018) Genome wide association studies (GWAS) of spot blotch resistance at the seedling and the adult plant stages in a collection of spring barley. Mol Breed 38:62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-018-0815-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haas M, Menke J, Chao S, Steffenson BJ (2016) Mapping quantitative trait loci conferring resistance to a widely virulent isolate of Cochliobolus sativus in wild barley accession PI 466423. Theor Appl Genet 129:1831–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johal GS, Briggs SP (1992) Reductase activity encoded by the HM1 disease resistance gene in maize. Science 258:985–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koladia VM, Richards JK, Wyatt NA, Faris JD, Brueggeman RS, Friesen TL (2017a) Genetic analysis of virulence in the Pyrenophora teres f. teres population BB25 × FGOH04Ptt-21. Fungal Genet Biol 107:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koladia VM, Faris JD, Richards JK, Brueggeman RS, Chao S, Friesen TL (2017b) Genetic analysis of net form net blotch resistance in barley lines CIho 5791 and Tifang against a global collection of P. teres f. teres isolates. Theor Appl Genet 130:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krattinger SG, Keller B (2016) Molecular genetics and evolution of disease resistance in cereals. New Phytol 212:320–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kroemer G, Jaattela M (2005) Lysosomes and autophagy in cell death control. Nat Rev Cancer 5:886–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leng Y, Zhong S (2012) Sfp-type 4 ‘-phosphopantetheinyl transferase is required for lysine synthesis, tolerance to oxidative stress and virulence in the plant pathogenic fungus Cochliobolus sativus. Mol Plant Pathol 13:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leng Y, Wang R, Ali S, Zhong S (2016) Sources and genetics of spot blotch resistance to a new pathotype of Cochliobolus sativus in a USDA barley core collection. Plant Dis 100:1988–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leng Y, Zhao M, Wang R, Steffenson BJ, Brueggeman RS, Zhong S (2018) The gene conferring susceptibility to spot blotch caused by Cochliobolus sativus is located at the Mla locus in barley cultivar Bowman. Theor Appl Genet 131:1531–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li D, Liu H, Zhang H, Wang X, Song F (2008) OsBIRH1, a DEAD-box RNA helicase with functions in modulating defence responses against pathogen infection and oxidative stress. J Exp Bot 59:2133–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Imai R (2018) Function of plant DExD/H-Box RNA helicases associated with ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Front Plant Sci 9:125.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00125 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu ZW, Biyashev RM, Maroof MS (1996) Development of simple sequence repeat DNA markers and their integration into a barley linkage map. Theor Appl Genet 93:869–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lorang JM, Carkaci-Salli N, Wolpert TJ (2004) Identification and characterization of victorin sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorang JM, Sweat TA, Wolpert TJ (2007) Plant disease susceptibility conferred by a “resistance” gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14861–14866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lorieux M (2012) MapDisto: fast and efficient computation of genetic linkage maps. Mol Breed 30:1231–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez M, Rubio-Somoza I, Carbonero P, Diaz I (2003) A cathepsin B-like cysteine protease gene from Hordeum vulgare (gene CatB) induced by GA in aleurone cells is under circadian control in leaves. J Exp Bot 54:951–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mascher M, Gundlach H, Himmelbach A, Beier S, Twardziok SO, Wicker T, Radchuk V, Dockter C, Hedley PE, Russell J et al (2017) A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mathre DE (1982) Compendium of barley diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  43. McLellan H, Gilroy EM, Yun BW, Birch PRJ, Loake GJ (2009) Functional redundancy in the Arabidopsis Cathepsin B gene family contributes to basal defence, the hypersensitive response and senescence. New Phytol 183:408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meldrum SI, Ogle HJ, Platz GJ (2004) Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley in Australia. APP 33:109–114Google Scholar
  45. Mengiste T (2012) Plant immunity to necrotrophs. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:267–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Michelmore R, Paran I, Kesseli R (1991) Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9828–9832.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.21.9828 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Röder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier MH, Leroy P, Ganal MW (1998) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149:2007–2023PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.Rproject.org/
  49. Scofield SR, Brandt AS (2012) Methods for virus-induced gene silencing in hexaploid wheat using barley stripe mosaic virus vectors. Methods Mol Biol 894:93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steffenson BJ, Hayes PM, Kleinhofs A (1996) Genetics of seedling and adult plant resistance to net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f teres) and spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) in barley. Theor Appl Genet 92:552–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tekauz A, Mueller E (2006) The leaf spot complex of barley in Manitoba, Canada: a 10-year perspective. In: Turkington TK, Orr DD, Xi K (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on barley leaf blights 23–27 July 2006, University of Alberta Conference Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp 63–66Google Scholar
  52. Valjavec-Gratian M (1996) Genetics of resistance and virulence in the Hordeum vulgare:Cochliobolus sativus pathosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation. North Dakota State University, FargoGoogle Scholar
  53. Valjavec-Gratian M, Steffenson BJ (1997a) Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus on barley. Plant Dis 81:1275–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Valjavec-Gratian M, Steffenson BJ (1997b) Genetics of virulence in Cochliobolus sativus and resistance in barley. Phytopathology 87:1140–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Doorn WG (2014) Classes of programmed cell death in plants, compared to those in animals. J Exp Bot 62:4749–4761.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93:77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang R, Leng Y, Zhong S (2015) The regulatory gene VosA affects conidiogenesis and is involved in virulence of the fungal cereal pathogen Cochliobolus sativus. Fungal Biol 119:884–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang R, Leng Y, Shrestha S, Zhong S (2016) Coordinated and independent functions of velvet-complex genes in fungal development and virulence of the fungal cereal pathogen Cochliobolus sativus. Fungal Biol 120:940–960Google Scholar
  59. Wang R, Leng Y, Ali S, Wang M, Zhong S (2017) Genome-wide association mapping of spot blotch resistance to three different pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus in the USDA barley core collection. Mol Breed 37:44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-017-0626-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilcoxson RD, Rasmusson DC, Miles MR (1990) Development of barley resistant to spot blotch and genetics of resistance. Plant Dis 74:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wolpert TJ, Dunkle LD, Ciuffetti LM (2002) Host-selective toxins and avirulence determinants: what’s in a name. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:251–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao M, Leng Y, Chao S, Xu SS, Zhong S (2018) Molecular mapping of QTL for Fusarium head blight resistance introgressed into durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet 131:1939–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhong S, Steffenson BJ (2001) Virulence and molecular diversity in Cochliobolus sativus. Phytopathology 91:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhong S, Steffenson BJ, Martinez JP, Ciuffetti LM (2002) A molecular genetic map and electrophoretic karyotype of the plant pathogenic fungus Cochliobolus sativus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou H, Steffenson B (2013) Genome-wide association mapping reveals genetic architecture of durable spot blotch resistance in US barley breeding germplasm. Mol Breed 32:139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of IdahoAberdeenUSA

Personalised recommendations