Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Analysis of genetic effects of nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction on quantitative traits: Genetic models for seed traits of plants

  • 131 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Two Genetic models (an embryo model and an endosperm model) were proposed for analyzing genetic effects of nuclear genes, cytoplasmic genes, maternal genes, and nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction (NCI) as well as their genotype by environment interaction for quantitative traits of plant seed. In these models, the NCI effects were partitioned into direct additive and dominance NCI components. Mixed linear model approaches were employed for statistical analysis. For both balanced and unbalanced diallel cross designs, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate unbiasedness and precision of estimated variance components of these models. The results showed that the proposed methods work well. Random genetic effects were predicted with an adjusted unbiased prediction method. Seed traits (protein content and oil content) of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were analyzed as worked examples to demonstrate the use of the models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson DA, Hinde JP (1988) Random effects in generalized linear models and the EM algorithm. Commun Statis Theory Meth 17:3847–3856

  2. Beavis WD, Pollak E, Frey KJ (1987) A theoretical model for quantitatively inherited traits influenced by nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction. Theor Appl Genet 74:571–578

  3. Bogyo TP, Lance RCM, Chevalier P, Nilan RA (1988) Genetic models for quantitatively inherited endosperm characters. Heredity 60:61–67

  4. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1977) Quadratic analysis of reciprocal crosses. Biometrics 33:187–203

  5. Eijlander R, Laak WT, Hermsen JGT, Ramanna MS (2000) Occurrence of self-compatibility, self-incompatibility and unilateral incompatibility after crossing diploid S. tuberosum (SI) with S. verrucosum (SC): I. Expression and inheritance of self-compatibility. Euphytica 115:127–139

  6. Foolad MR, Jones RA (1992) Models to estimate maternally controlled genetic variation in quantitative seed characters. Theor Appl Genet 83:360–366

  7. Françoise B, Pascal T, Rosine DP (2003) The nucleo-mitochondrial conflict in cytoplasmic male sterilities revisited. Genetica 117:3–16

  8. Galloway LF, Fenster CB (1999) The effect of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes on fitness and local adaptation in an annual legume, Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 53:1734–1743

  9. Gazyantz CM, Zhai XJ (1992) The physiological bases for interspecific hybrids of intensive type cotton. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 7:55–59

  10. Gokce AF, Havey MJ (2006) Selection at the Ms locus in open pollinated onion (Allium cepa L.) populations possessing S-cytoplasm or mixtures of N- and S-cytoplasms. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1495–1499

  11. Golmirzaie AM, Ortiz R (2003) Reciprocal effects in true potato seed breeding in short-day length environments. Plant Breed 122:372–374

  12. Hartley HO, Rao JNR (1967) Maximum-likelihood estimation for the mixed analysis of variance model. Biometrics 54:93–108

  13. Ke JS, Wen TN, Nikolau BJ, Wurtele ES (2000) Coordinate regulation of the nuclear and plastidic genes coding for the subunits of the Heteromeric Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase. Plant Physiol 122:1057–1071

  14. Leon P, Arroyo A, Mackenzie S (1998) Nuclear control of plastid and mitochondrial development in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:453–480

  15. Lou XY, Zhu J (2002) Analysis of genetic effects of major genes and polygenes on quantitative traits. II. Genetic models for seed traits of crops. Theor Appl Genet 105:964–971

  16. Mizumoto K, Murai K, Nakamura C, Takumi S (2004) Preferential expression of a HLP homolog encoding a mitochondrial L14 ribosomal protein in stamens of common wheat. Gene 343:281–289

  17. Mo HD (1987) Genetic expression for endosperm traits. In: Weir B, Eisen E, Goodman M, Namkoong G (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 478–487

  18. Mosjidis JA, Waines JG, Yermanos DM, Rosielle AA (1989) Methods for the study of cytoplasmic effects on quantitative traits. Theor Appl Genet 77:195–199

  19. Murai K, Takumi S, Koga H, Ogihara Y (2002) Pistillody, homoeotic transformation of stamens into pistil-like structures, caused by nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction in wheat. Plant J 29:169–181

  20. Pathania A, Bhat SR, Kumar VD, Ashutosh, Kirti PB, Prakash S, Chopra VL (2003) Cytoplasmic male sterility in alloplasmic Brassica juncea carrying Diplotaxis catholica cytoplasm: molecular characterization and genetics of fertility restoration. Theor Appl Genet 107:455–461

  21. Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biomatrika 58:545–554

  22. Peterson CJ (1992) Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Sci 32:98–103

  23. Pooni HS, Kumar I, Khush GS (1992) A comprehensive model for disomically inherited metrical traits expressed in triploid tissues. Heredity 69:166–174

  24. Ramana S, Sharma-Natu P, Ghildiyal MC (2002) Cytoplasmic effects on photosynthesis and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity in Brassica species. Euphytica 123:361–365

  25. Rao CR (1971) Estimation of variance and covariance components MINQUE theory. J Multivar Anal 1:257–275

  26. Rao AP, Fleming AA (1978) Cytoplasmic-genetypic effect in the GT 112 maize inbred with four cytoplasms. Crop Sci 18:935–937

  27. Schnable PS, Wise RP (1998) The molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility and fertility restoration. Trends Plant Sci 3:175–180

  28. Strand A (2004) Plastid-to-nucleus signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:621–625

  29. Tao D, Hu F, Yang J, Yang G, Yang Y, Xu P, Li J, Ye C, Dai L (2004) Cytoplasm and cytoplasm-nucleus interactions affect agronomic traits in japonica rice. Euphytica 135:129–134

  30. Touzet P, Hueber N, Brkholz A, Barnes S, Cuguen J (2004) Genetic analysis of male fertility restoration in wild cytoplasmic male sterility G of beet. Theor Appl Genet 109:240–247

  31. Tsuchiya Y, Nambara E, Naito S, McCourt P (2004) The FUS3 transcription factor functions through the epidermal regulator TTG1 during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 37:73–81

  32. Wada Y, Kashiwagi N (1990) Selecting statistical models with information statistics. J Dairy Sci 73:3573–3582

  33. Zhu J, Weir BS (1994a) Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects: I. a genetic model for diploid plant seeds and animals. Theor Appl Genet 89:153–159

  34. Zhu J, Weir BS (1994b) Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternal effects: II. genetic models for triplod endosperms. Theor Appl Genet 89:160–166

  35. Zhu J, Weir BS (1996) Diallel analysis for sex-linked and maternal effects. Theor Appl Genet 92:1–9

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the 973 project of National Natural Science Foundation of China. We are grateful to Dr. Jannink Jean-Luc and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments and suggestions on the earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Jun Zhu.

Additional information

Communicated by J.-L. Jannink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, L., Xu, H., Zhu, J. et al. Analysis of genetic effects of nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction on quantitative traits: Genetic models for seed traits of plants. Theor Appl Genet 116, 769–776 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0709-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mean Square Error
  • Upland Cotton
  • Estimate Variance Component
  • Seed Trait
  • Mixed Linear Model Approach