Zusammenfassung
Nach einer Metananalyse an über 50.000 Patienten mit Sekundärprophylaxe nach einem kardialen Ereignis und Absetzen von Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) traten 3-mal mehr kardiale Komplikationen auf als bei kontinuierlicher Plättchenhemmung; bei implantierten Koronarstents kann das Risiko für ein akutes Koronarsyndrom bis auf das 90-Fache ansteigen. Dabei spielt die Dauer einer ASS-Medikation für das kardiovaskuläre oder zerebrovaskuläre Ereignis keine Rolle. Es ist daher heute obsolet, ASS routinemäßig vor einer urologischen Operation abzusetzen, solange es sich nicht um eine primäre Indikation für die Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung handelt. Viele und häufige urologische Eingriffe (außer der ESWL) lassen sich auch ohne signifikante Erhöhung der Morbidität problemlos unter kontinuierlicher ASS-Gabe durchführen. Bei der dualen Hemmung mit zusätzlicher Clopidogrelgabe kann die Situation komplex sein; hier muss von Fall zu Fall mit dem Kardiologen gemeinsam entschieden werden.
Abstract
In a systematic overview and meta-analysis among more than 50,000 patients at risk for coronary artery disease, not adhering to or discontinuing aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA) was associated with a significantly increased risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction or death. Withdrawal of low dose aspirin was correlated with a threefold increase in the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. This risk is present irrespective of the length of time patients had been taking low dose aspirin. Therefore, in patients on chronic low dose aspirin for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, aspirin should never be discontinued. In the few available studies in urological surgery the increase in bleeding does not translate into a significant increase in specific morbidity. This seems to be also true for the additional administration of clopidogrel to aspirin. Nevertheless, in patients with drug-eluting stents and dual antiplatelet therapy, urologists should ensure a multidisciplinary management of the perioperative course.
Literatur
Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC et al (1995) A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. N Engl J Med 332:75–79
Kretschmer V (1998) Perioperative risk of hemorrhage in urologic operations caused by administration of aspirin. Urologe A 37:675 (Erratum in: Urologe A (1999) 38:310)
Fischer C, Wöhrle J, Pastor J et al (2007) Ultrastrukturelle Veränderungen am Nierenparenchym durch ESWL unter Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) – Elektronenmikroskopische Befunde an der Rattenniere. Urologe 46:150–155
Neumann FJ, Widimsky P, Belardi JA (2012) One-year outcomes of patients with the zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent: RESOLUTE International Registry. EuroIntervention 7:1181–1188
Eberli D, Chassot PG, Sulser T et al (2010) Urological surgery and antiplatelet drugs after cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents. J Urol 183:2128–2136
Collet JP, Montalescot G, Blanchet B et al (2004) Impact of prior use or recent withdrawal of oral antiplatelet agents on acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 10:2361–2367
Möllmann H, Nef HM, Hamm ChW, Elsässer A (2009) How to manage patients with need for antiplatelet therapy in the setting of (un-)planned surgery. Clin Res Cardiol 98:8–15
Burger W, Chemnitius JM, Kneissl GD, Rücker G (2005) Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention – cardiovascular risks after its perioperative withdrawal versus bleeding risks with its continuation – review and meta-analysis. J Intern Med 257:399–414
Fatah K, Beving H, Albage A et al (1996) Acetylsalicylic acid may protect the patient by increasing fibrin gel porosity. Is withdrawing of treatment harmful to the patient? Eur Heart J 17(9):1362–1366
Ala-Opas MY, Grönlund SS (1996) Blood loss in long-term aspirin users undergoing transurethral prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 30:203–206
Nielsen JD, Holm-Nielsen A, Jespersen J et al (2000) The effect of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid on bleeding after transurethral prostatectomy – a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 34:194–198
Taylor K, Filgate R, Guo DY, Macneil F (2011) A retrospective study to assess the morbidity associated with transurethral prostatectomy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. BJU Int 108(Suppl 2):45–50
Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Agostoni P et al (2006) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50 279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 27:2667–2674
Enver MK, Hoh I, Chinegwundoh FI (2006) The management of aspirin in transurethral prostatectomy: current practice in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:280–283
Ehrlich Y, Yossepowitch O, Margel D et al (2007) Early initiation of aspirin after prostate and transurethral bladder surgeries is not associated with increased incidence of postoperative bleeding: a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 178:524–528
Sandhu JS, Ng CK, Gonzales RR et al (2005) Photoselective laser vaporisation prostatectomy in men receiving anticoagulants. J Endourol 19:1196–1198
Turna B, Stein RJ, Smaldone MC et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium: YAG lithotripsy for intrarenal stones in anticoagulated cases. J Urol 179:1415–1419
Herget EJ, Saliken JC, Donnelly BJ et al (1999) Transrectal ultra-sound-guided biopsy of the prostate: relation between ASA use and bleeding complications. Can Assoc Radiol J 50:173–176
Giannarini G, Mogorovich A, Valent F et al (2007) Continuing or discontinuing low-dose aspirin before transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Urology 70:501–505
Maan Z, Cutting CW, Patel U et al (2003) Morbidity of transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies in patients after the continued use of low-dose aspirin. BJU Int 91:798–800
Halliwell OT, Yadegafar G, Lane C, Dewbury KC (2008) Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: aspirin increases the incidence of minor bleeding complications. Clin Radiol 63:557–561
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. C. Fischer und G. Lümmen geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, C., Lümmen, G. ASS und Clopidogrel bei urologischen Operationen. Urologe 52, 1597–1605 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3263-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3263-9