Advertisement

The Science of Nature

, 106:4 | Cite as

Foraging and homing behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera) during a total solar eclipse

  • Prashant Waiker
  • Saman Baral
  • Anissa Kennedy
  • Shilpi Bhatia
  • Anika Rueppell
  • Kevin Le
  • Esmaeil Amiri
  • Jennifer TsurudaEmail author
  • Olav RueppellEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Exceptional natural phenomena, such as those that occur during a total solar eclipse, provide unique opportunities to study animal behavior outside the naturally evolved context, which can be informative in more general terms. Circumstantial descriptions of abnormal animal behavior during solar eclipses abound, although scientific studies conducted during an eclipse are relatively rare due to inherent logistical difficulties. Here, honey bee foraging and homing behavior were studied during the total solar eclipse of August 21, 2017. In the first experiment, we studied foraging behavior of honey bees during the progression of the solar eclipse and found that the foraging activity drastically decreased but did not completely cease during the totality of the eclipse, in contrast to previous reports of complete cessation. The data indicate that the level of ambient light can largely overrule the internal circadian rhythm of foraging honey bees. Furthermore, colonies with a higher need for foraging decreased their foraging activity less than satiated colonies, consistent with the hypothesis that individual foraging decisions may be influenced by colony state, which affects cost-benefit analyses. In a second experiment, the temporal dynamics of homing of released workers and drones was compared in periods before, during, and after the solar eclipse. During the totality of the eclipse, very few bees arrived back at their hive, while homing before the total eclipse was accelerated, particularly in drones. The results suggest that, while the homing abilities of honey bees are not compromised until the sun is completely eclipsed, they may still interpret the diminishing light as an indicator of deteriorating flight conditions. Our unique study provides some insight into the control of honey bee foraging behavior when external cues and internal circadian rhythms are at odds, lent support to the notion that food deprivation can lead to riskier foraging, and indicated that homing in honey bees is possible even with very small amounts of sunlight.

Keywords

Solar eclipse Circadian rhythm Navigation Animal behavior Honey bee Risky foraging Homing behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Clemson University for facilitating the research. The exact timing of the eclipse was calculated by NASA and helped in the advance experimental design.

Authors’ contributions

The project idea was conceived by OR and PW. SB, JT, and OR designed the experiment. Colonies were prepared and provided by JT. All authors participated in the data collection. Data analysis and interpretation was performed by PW, SB, JT, and OR. PW and SB wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, which was significantly revised by OR, before going through a final set of revisions and approvals from all authors.

Funding information

Financial support was provided by the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, the US Army Research Office (W911NF1520045), Clemson University, and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1005512.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

114_2018_1597_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
114_2018_1597_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (121 kb)
ESM 2 (XLSX 121 kb)

References

  1. Banschbach VS, Waddington KD (1994) Risk-sensitive foraging in honey bees: no consensus among individuals and no effect of colony honey stores. Anim Behav 47:933–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloch G, Bar-Shai N, Cytter Y, Green R (2017) Time is honey: circadian clocks of bees and flowers and how their interactions may influence ecological communities. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briceno R, Ramirez W (1993) Activity of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and some spiders (Araneidae) during the 1991 total solar eclipse in Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 41:291–293Google Scholar
  4. Camazine S (1993) The regulation of pollen foraging by honey bees: how foragers assess the colony’s need for pollen. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke D, Robert D (2018) Predictive modelling of honey bee foraging activity using local weather conditions. Apidologie 49:386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collett TS, Graham P (2004) Animal navigation: path integration, visual landmarks and cognitive maps. Curr Biol 14:R475–R477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collett M, Chittka L, Collett TS (2013) Spatial memory in insect navigation. Curr Biol 23:R789–R800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbet SA (1990) Pollination and the weather. Isr J Bot 39:13–30Google Scholar
  9. Délye G (1974) Observations sur le comportement de la fourmi Cataglyphis bicolor (Fabricius) lors d'une éclipse totale de soleil. Insect Soc 21:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devillers J, Doré JC, Tisseur M, Cluzeau S, Maurin G (2004) Modelling the flight activity of Apis mellifera at the hive entrance. Comput Electron Agric 42:87–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyer FC, Could JL (1983) Honey bee navigation: the honey bee's ability to find its way depends on a hierarchy of sophisticated orientation mechanisms. Am Sci 71:587–597Google Scholar
  12. Evangelista C, Kraft P, Dacke M, Labhart T, Srinivasan M (2014) Honeybee navigation: critically examining the role of the polarization compass. Philos Trans R Soc B 369:20130037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fewell JH, Winston ML (1992) Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galen C, Miller Z, Lynn A, Axe M, Holden S, Storks L, Ramirez E, Asante E, Heise D, Kephart S, Kepart J (2018) Monitoring reveals impacts of a total solar eclipse on flight behavior and activity schedule of foraging bees. Ann Entomol Soc Am say035.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/say035
  15. Golombek DA, Rosenstein RE (2010) Physiology of circadian entrainment. Physiol Rev 90:1063–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinze S, Narendra A, Cheung A (2018) Principles of insect path integration. Curr Biol 28:R1043–R1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Homberg U (2004) In search of the sky compass in the insect brain. Naturwissenschaften 91:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hrassnigg N, Crailsheim K (2005) Differences in drone and worker physiology in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 36:255–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hübner C, Czaczkes TJ (2017) Risk preference during collective decision making: ant colonies make risk-indifferent collective choices. Anim Behav 132:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ish-Am G, Eisikowitch D (1998) Mobility of honey bees (Apidae, Apis mellifera L.) during foraging in avocado orchards. Apidologie 29:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jagannath A, Taylor L, Wakaf Z, Vasudevan SR, Foster RG (2017) The genetics of circadian rhythms, sleep and health. Hum Mol Genet 26:R128–R138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kacelnik A, Bateson M (1996) Risky theories—the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Am Zool 36:402–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kullenberg B (1955) Biological observations during the solar eclipse in southern Sweden (province of Öland) on 30th June 1954. Oikos 6:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee KY, Yim SH, Seo HJ, Kim SY, Yoon HJ (2016) The influence of insect pollination and artificial pollination on fruit quality and economic profit in the ‘Niitaka’pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Korean J Org Agric 24:759–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma R, Villar G, Grozinger CM, Rangel J (2018) Larval pheromones act as colony-wide regulators of collective foraging behavior in honeybees. Behav Ecol 29:1132–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1992) Risk-sensitive foraging: a review of the theory. Bull Math Biol 54:355–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore D, Rankin MA (1985) Circadian locomotor rhythms in individual honeybees. Physiol Entomol 10:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore D, Rankin MA (1993) Light and temperature entrainment of a locomotor rhythm in honeybees. Physiol Entomol 18:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nonacs P, Dill LM (1990) Mortality risk vs. food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71:1886–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Özbey O, Aysondu MH, Özer H, Şimsek ÜG (2004) The effects of a solar eclipse on animals behavior. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 28:55–61Google Scholar
  31. Pankiw T, Page RE, Fondrk MK (1998) Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peso M, Barron AB (2014) The effects of brood ester pheromone on foraging behaviour and colony growth in apicultural settings. Apidologie 45:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pilorz V, Helfrich-Förster C, Oster H (2018) The role of the circadian clock system in physiology. Pflügers Arch Eur - J Physiol:1–13Google Scholar
  34. Puškadija Z, Štefanić E, Mijić A, Zdunić Z, Parađiković N, Florijančić T, Opačak A (2007) Influence of weather conditions on honey bee visits (Apis mellifera carnica) during sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) blooming period. Poljoprivreda 13:230–233Google Scholar
  35. Riddell Pearce FC, Couvillon MJ, Ratnieks FLW (2013) Hive relocation does not adversely affect honey bee (hymenoptera: Apidae) foraging. Psyche 2013:693856Google Scholar
  36. Rivera MD, Donaldson-Matasci M, Dornhaus A (2015) Quitting time: when do honey bee foragers decide to stop foraging on natural resources? Front Ecol Evol 19:50Google Scholar
  37. Roenneberg T, Daan S, Merrow M (2003) The art of entrainment. J Biol Rhythm 18:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roonwal M (1956) Behaviour of the rock bees, Apis dorsata Fabr., during a partial solar eclipse in India. Proc Natl Inst Sci India B 22:281–286Google Scholar
  39. Rueppell O, Kirkman RW (2005) Extraordinary starvation resistance in Temnothorax rugatulus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) colonies: demography and adaptive behavior. Insect Soc 52:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scapini F, Rossano C, Marchetti GM, Morgan E (2005) The role of the biological clock in the sun compass orientation of free-running individuals of Talitrus saltator. Anim Behav 69:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2001) Cannibalism and early capping: strategy of honeybee colonies in times of experimental pollen shortages. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 187:541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schulz DJ, Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1998) Effects of colony food shortage on behavioral development in honey bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Traynor KS, Le Conte Y, Page RE (2015) Age matters: pheromone profiles of larvae differentially influence foraging behaviour in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 99:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ugolini A, Castellini C, Tiribilli B (2004) The orientation of the sandhopper Talitrus saltator during a partial solar eclipse. J Comp Physiol A 190:855–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Warrant E, Porombka T, Kirchner WH (1996) Neural image enhancement allows honeybees to see at night. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1521–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Willard LE, Hayes AM, Wallrichs MA, Rueppell O (2011) Food manipulation in honeybees induces physiological responses at the individual and colony level. Apidologie 42:508–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woyciechowski M, Kozlowski J (1998) Division of labor by division of risk according to worker life expectancy in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie 29:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woyke J, Jasinski Z, Cezary F, Woyke H (2000) Flight activity of Apis mellifera foragers at the hive entrance during 86% eclipse of sun. Pszczel Ćesz Nauk 44:239–249Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of North Carolina GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Organismic and Molecular EvolutionJohannes Gutenberg Universität MainzMainzGermany
  3. 3.The Early College at Guilford, Guilford CollegeGreensboroUSA
  4. 4.College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Life SciencesClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Entomology & Plant PathologyKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations