Skip to main content
Log in

Ältere Patienten in klinischen Studien

Neue fitnessadaptierte Konzepte

Elderly patients in clinical trials

New fitness-adapted concepts

  • Schwerpunkt: Altersmedizin
  • Published:
Der Internist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Kennzeichnend für das fortgeschrittene Lebensalter ist eine hohe Krankheitslast. Trotzdem sind ältere Patienten mit inneren Erkrankungen in klinischen Studien oft unterrepräsentiert; patienten-, arzt- und protokollbezogene Barrieren verhindern vor allem den Einschluss von alten Patienten mit eingeschränkter „medizinischer Fitness“ (Komorbidität, Komedikation, schlechter Performancestatus, kognitives Defizit etc.). Empfehlungen, die auf Studien an jüngeren Erwachsenen basieren, können meistens nicht pauschal für ältere Patienten übernommen werden. In der Versorgungspraxis und in klinischen Studien sollte nicht alters-, sondern fitnessadaptiert behandelt werden: Bei guter Fitness ist die Standardbehandlung in der Regel auch bei älteren Patienten wirksam und gut verträglich. Bei eingeschränkter Fitness können Therapiemodifikationen indiziert sein. An Studien, die neue Therapiemodalitäten an jüngeren Erwachsenen erproben, sollten auch ältere Patienten mit guter Fitness teilnehmen können. Nutzen und Risiko von Therapiemodifikationen müssen bei älteren Patienten mit reduzierter Fitness in gesonderten Studien erforscht werden.

Abstract

Advanced age is associated with a higher burden of illness. Nevertheless, elderly patients suffering from internal diseases are underrepresented in clinical trials; patient, physician and protocol-designed barriers in particular prevent the recruitment of older patients with impaired medical fitness (co-morbidity, co-medication, poor performance status, cognitive dysfunction etc.). Recommendations that are based on trials in younger subjects mostly cannot be generally adopted for the elderly. Treatment in clinical practice and clinical trials should be fitness-adapted rather than age-adjusted. Normally, standard regimens are effective and well tolerated in medically fit patients of advanced age. In contrast, it may be necessary to apply modified regimens for the medically unfit. Trials exploring novel treatment modalities in the young should always allow the inclusion of elderly patients with good medical fitness. The benefit of modifying a treatment regimen in medically unfit patients of advanced age has to be determined by separate trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Bailey SM, Wilkoff BL (2006) Complications of pacemakers and defibrillators in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 15: 102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balzi D, Barchielli A, Buiatti E et al. (2006) Age and comorbidity in acute myocardial infarction: a report from the AMI-Florence Italian registry. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 15: 35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandyopadhyay S, Bayer AJ, O’Mahony MS (2001) Age and gender bias in statin trials. QJM 94: 127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernardi D, Milan I, Balzarotti M et al. (2003) Comprehensive geriatric evaluation in elderly patients with lymphoma: feasibility of a patient-tailored treatment plan. J Clin Oncol 21: 754–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bugeja G, Kumar A, Banerjee AK (1997) Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research: a descriptive study of published reports. BMJ 315: 1059

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaudhry SI, Berlowitz DR, Concato J (2005) Do age and comorbidity affect intensity of pharmacological therapy for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus? J Am Geriatr Soc 53: 1214–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coelho Filho JM (2001) Appraising clinical trial evidence for elderly people: special considerations. Age Ageing 30: 117–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cramer P, Goede V, Jenke P et al. (2006) Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Onkologie 29: 32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gill SS, Bronskill SE, Mamdani M et al. (2004) Representation of patients with dementia in clinical trials of donepezil. Can J Clin Pharmacol 11: e274–e285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J (1992) The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 268: 1417–1422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heiat A, Gross CP, Krumholz HM (2002) Representation of the elderly, women, and minorities in heart failure clinical trials. Arch Intern Med 162: 1682–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al. (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341: 2061–2067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Quintrec JL, Bussy C, Golmard JL et al. (2005) Randomized controlled drug trials on very elderly subjects: descriptive and methodological analysis of trials published between 1990 and 2002 and comparison with trials on adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60: 340–344

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee PY, Alexander KP, Hammill BG et al. (2001) Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 286: 708–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP et al. (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21: 1383–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martell RE, Peterson BL, Cohen HJ et al. (2002) Analysis of age, estimated creatinine clearance and pretreatment hematologic parameters as predictors of fludarabine toxicity in patients treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a CALGB (9011) coordinated intergroup study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 50: 37–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell SL, Sullivan EA, Lipsitz LA (1997) Exclusion of elderly subjects from clinical trials for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 54: 1393–1398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 291: 2720–2726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rochon PA, Fortin PR, Dear KB et al. (1993) Reporting of age data in clinical trials of arthritis: deficiencies and solutions. Arch Intern Med 153: 243–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Siu LL (2007) Clinical trials in the elderly: a concept comes of age. N Engl J Med 356: 1575–1576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R (2004) Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol 22: 4626–4631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL (2005) Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 23: 3112–3124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Traub D, Ganz L (2006) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for secondary prevention: is it worth it in the elderly? Am J Geriatr Cardiol 15: 93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei L, Ebrahim S, Bartlett C et al. (2005) Statin use in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: cohort study and comparison of inclusion and outcome with patients in randomised trials. BMJ 330: 821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Witham MD, McMurdo ME (2007) How to get older people included in clinical studies. Drugs Aging 24: 187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yee KW, Pater JL, Pho L et al. (2003) Enrollment of older patients in cancer treatment trials in Canada: why is age a barrier? J Clin Oncol 21: 1618–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Goede.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goede, V., Hallek, M. Ältere Patienten in klinischen Studien. Internist 48, 1232–1238 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-007-1944-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-007-1944-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation