Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 995–1007 | Cite as

Selected physical, mechanical, and insulation properties of carbon fiber fabric-reinforced composite plywood for carriage floors

  • Yuansong Liu
  • Mingjie GuanEmail author
Original
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Lightweight automobiles urgently need a kind of high strength lightweight structure carriage floor. In this study, a carbon fiber fabric/poplar/eucalyptus composite plywood for carriage floors was prepared by designing different structures of low-strength, fast-growing poplar veneer, eucalyptus veneer, and high-performance carbon fiber fabric. The mechanical properties, thermal insulation, and sound insulation of the composite plywood were evaluated. Results indicated that the composite plywood had a density of less than 0.7 g/cm3. In addition, the 24 h water absorption rate and the 24 h thickness swelling rate of the composite plywood were markedly reduced after the surface was reinforced with the carbon fiber fabric. The core-reinforced group showed large increases in bond strength, screw holding capability, and thermal insulation performance. The carbon fiber fabric-reinforced plywood showed improvement in stability and sound insulation performance in high-frequency bands. The carbon fiber fabric-reinforced plywood is a low-cost, high-strength, lightweight floor alternative.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Jiangsu Provincial Policy Guidance Program—Special Science and Technology Project in Northern Jiangsu, China (SZ-LYG2017014) and the Project Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References

  1. ASTM D 1037 (2012) Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials. American Society for Test and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bal BC (2016) Some technological properties of laminated veneer lumber produced with fast-growing Poplar and Eucalyptus. Maderas Cie Tecnol 18(03):413–424Google Scholar
  3. Balıkoğlu F, Demircioğlu TK, İnal O, Arslan N, Ay, Ataş A (2018) Compression after low velocity impact tests of marine sandwich composites: effect of intermediate wooden layers. Compos Struct 183:636–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belingardi G, Beyene AT, Koricho EG, Martorana B (2015) Alternative lightweight materials and component manufacturing technologies for vehicle frontal bumper beam. Compos Struct 120:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchelt B, Dietrich T, Wagenführ A (2014) Testing of set recovery of unmodified and furfurylated densified wood by means of water storage and alternating climate tests. Holzforschung 68(1):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demircioğlu TK, Balıkoğlu F, İnal O, Arslan N, Ay Ataş A (2018) Experimental investigation on low-velocity impact response of wood skinned sandwich composites with different core configurations. Mater Today Commun 17:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donnet JD, Want TK, Peng JCM et al (1998) Carbon fibers, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc, ManhattanGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao YH, Shi XF, Xie SM et al (2017) Sensitivity analysis and lightweight design for high-speed train car body. J Railw Sci Eng 14(05):885–891Google Scholar
  9. GB/T 10295 (2008) Thermal insulation—Determination of steady-state thermal resistance and related properties—Heat flow meter apparatus. SAC/TC191, National Technical Committee for standardization of thermal insulation material. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine and Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. GB/T 17657 (2013) Test methods of evaluating the properties of wood-based panels and surface decorated wood-based panels. SAC/TC 198. National Technical Committee 198 on Wood-Based Panels Standardization of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  11. GB/T 18696.2 (2002) Acoustics—determination of sound absorption coefficient and impedance in impedance tubes—Part 2: Transfer function method. National Acoustic Standardization Technical Committee. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  12. GB/T 50352 (2005) Code for design of civil building. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine and Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  13. GB/T 4272 (2008) General principles for thermal insulation technique of equipment and pipes. National Technical Committee for Standardization of Energy Foundation and ManagementGoogle Scholar
  14. GB/T 9846 (2015) Plywood for general use. SAC/TC 198, National Technical Committee 198 on Wood-Based Panels Standardization of ChinaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong MX, Chen RX, Song YT et al (2013) Methods of inorganic modification of wood. For Eng 29(1):65–68Google Scholar
  16. Güler T, Demirci E, Yildiz AR, Yavuz U (2018) Lightweight design of an automobile hinge component using glass fiber polyamide composites. Mater Test 60(03):306–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo XD, Zhu L, Fan L, Xie BC (2011) Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA. Energy Policy 39(05):2352–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo Y, Zhu X, Yang Y, Xiong N (2015) Research state of lightweight material and manufacture processes in automotive industry. Forging Stamp Technol 40(03):1–6Google Scholar
  19. Höltl A, Macharis C, De Brucker K (2018) Pathways to decarbonise the european car fleet: a scenario analysis using the backcasting approach. Energies 11(1):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang WC, Choi JH, Yang YJ, Yang IY (2015) Impact characteristics of double-hat cross-section carbon fibre reinforced plastic members for optimal crashworthiness design. Mater Res Innov 19(05):708–712Google Scholar
  21. Inoue M, Minato K, Norimoto M (1994) Permanent fixation of compressive deformation of wood by crosslinking. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 40(9):931–936Google Scholar
  22. Jiao GL, Yan MY (2017) Source, direction of technological progress and energy saving of industry. Stat Inf Forum 32(04):81–86Google Scholar
  23. Kim DH, Kim HG, Kim HS (2015) Design optimization and manufacture of hybrid glass/carbon fiber reinforced composite bumper beam for automobile vehicle. Compos Struct 131:742–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Labans E, Kalnins K, Bisagni C (2019) Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with cellular wood, plywood stiffener/foam and thermoplastic composite core. J Sandwich Struct Mater 21(2):784–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakreb N, Knapic S, Machado JS, Bezzazi B, Pereira H (2018) Properties of multilayered sandwich panels with an agglomerated cork core for interior applications in buildings. Eur J Wood Prod 76:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu BG (2016) The optimization design of carbon fiber reinforced plastic of pure electric vehicle body structure. Hunan University, HunanGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu YS, Guan MJ, Chen XW et al (2019) Flexural properties evaluation of carbon-fiber fabric reinforced poplar/eucalyptus composite plywood formwork. Compos Struct 224:1–8Google Scholar
  28. Lu XW, Ma SP (2016) Research to the Influence of Environmental Regulation on Industry Productivity. Science Technology & Industry 16(04):88–93Google Scholar
  29. Luo YF (2011) R&D Directions and market development trend of carbon composite materials. High Tech Fiber Appl 36(03):1–7Google Scholar
  30. Lyu MY, Choi TG, Cho HS (2015) Application trend of plastics: manufacturing technology of plastics for lightweight automobile. Trans Mater Process 24(06):443–450Google Scholar
  31. Meschut G, Janzen V, Olfermann T (2014) Innovative and highly productive joining technologies for multi-material lightweight car body structures. J Mater Eng Perform 23(5):1515–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Que Z, Jiang H, Fu Q et al (2012) Effects of vessel diameter on screw withdrawal strength in laminated veneer lumbers. China Wood Based Panels 6:14–16Google Scholar
  33. Reengwaree A, Premanond V, Torsakul S (2013) A study of energy saving in building through thermal insulation with plywood inserted honeycomb sandwich panels. Energy Proced 34:964–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Santos J, Gouveia RM, Silva FJG (2015) Designing a new sustainable approach to the change for lightweight materials in structural components used in truck industry. J Cleaner Prod 164:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shukla KS, Bhatnagar RC (1989) A note on the effect of compression on strength Properties of populous deltoides and populous ciliate. J Timber Dev Assoc India 35(1):17–25Google Scholar
  36. Sun Y (2017) Research on Manufacturing and Properties of Wood/Rubber/HDPE Composites. Nanjing Forestry UniversityGoogle Scholar
  37. Susainathan J, Eyma F, De Luycker E, Cantarel A, Castanier B (2017) Manufacturing and quasi-static bending behavior of wood-based sandwich structures. Compos Struct 182:487–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Susainathan J, Eyma F, De Luycker E, Cantarel A, Castanie B (2018) Experimental investigation of impact behavior of wood-based sandwich structures. Compos A 109:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang LG, Zhang N (2015) Sustainable development of China’s commercial vehicles. Adv Manuf 1:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang MM, Xiao SN, Yang GW et al (2015) Application and research of carbon fiber composite materials in vehicle hood of high-speed train. Electr Locomot Mass Transit Veh 38(S1):53–57Google Scholar
  41. Wei W (2013) Comprehensive evaluation of energy conservation and emissions reduction for Green Power Grid. Guilin: 2nd international conference on energy and environmental protection (ICEEP), 2013Google Scholar
  42. Xu T, Shi T (2017) Discussion on the development direction of automobile energy saving and emission reduction technology. Automob Appl Technol 10:268–270Google Scholar
  43. Zhang YJ (2016) Current situation and trend of automobile lightweight material technology. Automob Parts 04:83–85Google Scholar
  44. Zhang SN, Liu YB (2018) Structural design and machining process of automotive CFRP. Automob Technol Mater 9:8–14Google Scholar
  45. Zhang DY, Liu HM, Nie Q (2014) Analysis on macro and micro mechanical properties of wood composite panels based on finite element modeling. J Anhui Agric Sci 42(30):10711–10714Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Materials Science and EngineeringBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations