European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 4, pp 673–680 | Cite as

High temperature drying effect against resin exudation for maritime pine wood used as outdoor siding

  • Thomas CabaretEmail author
  • Fabien Mariet
  • Ke Li
  • Léo Leroyer
  • Bertrand Charrier


The effect of temperature during the wood drying process was studied in order to prevent resin exudation on the surface of maritime pine wood boards used as outdoor siding. Resin exudation is a crucial concern for the maritime pine industry, as it may strongly decrease the wood aesthetics during outdoor exposure. In a previous study, it was observed that the thermal history of rosin can change the softening point temperature of its compounds. Using heat treatment, this temperature can shift from about 40 °C–60 °C, which corresponds to the maximal surface temperature of an unpainted wood siding in a temperate climatic zone. In the present study, green wood boards from various trees were dried at various temperatures (60 °C, 90 °C, 120 °C and 150 °C) and directly evaluated after drying regarding their resistance to exudation. To perform this test, an infrared radiative system was developed in order to recreate summer outdoor conditions. The results show the absence of exudation for boards dried at high-temperature (150 °C). In order to better understand the effects of a heat treatment on resin compounds inside wood, they were studied using HPLC after extraction. The analysis was compared to a standard rosin used in a previous study showing strong similarity. These results highlight some new effects of high temperature drying which may offer new strategies for reducing resin exudation on outdoor wood siding by fixing the resin compounds inside the wood.



We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Nouvelle Aquitaine region and the Landes departmental council. This work was also funded by ANR-10-EQPX-16 XYLOFOREST (Mont-de-Marsan).We also gratefully acknowledge the support from our partners: Bardage Bois Neoclin, FCBA, FPbois, Gascogne Bois, Lesbats Scieries d’Aquitaine, Scierie Labadie, and Holiste. The text was proofread by Jean-François Delannoy.


  1. Alday JG, Martínez-Ruiz C, Marrs RH, Bravo F (2010) Influence of harvesting intensity on the floristic composition of natural mediterranean maritime pine forest. Acta Oecol 36:349–356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ananias R, Venegas R, Salvo L, Elustondo D (2013) Kiln schedule certification for industrial drying of radiata pine. Wood Fiber Sci 45:98–104Google Scholar
  3. Artaki I, Ray U, Gordon HM, Gervasio MS (1992) Thermal degradation of rosin during high temperature solder reflow. Thermochim Acta 198:7–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal BC (2015) Physical properties of beech wood thermally modified in hot oil and in hot air at various temperatures. Maderas Cienc Tecnol 17:789–798. Google Scholar
  5. Bergman R, Puettmann M, Taylor A, Skog K (2014) The carbon impacts of wood products. For Prod J 64:220–231. Google Scholar
  6. Brischke C, Meyer-Veltrup L (2016) Performance of thermally modified wood during 14 years of outdoor exposure. Int Wood Prod J 7:89–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabaret T, Boulicaud B, Chatet E, Charrier B (2018) Study of rosin softening point through thermal treatment for a better understanding of maritime pine exudation. Eur J Wood Prod 76(5):1453–1549. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen G-F (1992) Developments in the field of rosin chemistry and its implications in coatings. Prog Org Coat 20:139–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheniclet C (1987) Effects of wounding and fungus inoculation on terpene producing systems of maritime pine. J Exp Bot 38:1557–1572. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croteau R, Gurkewitz S, Johnson MA, Fisk HJ (1987) Biochemistry of oleoresinosis. Monoterpene and diterpene biosynthesis in lodgepole pine saplings infected with Ceratocystis clavigera or treated with carbohydrate elicitors. Plant Physiol 85:1123–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dirol D, Guyonnet R (1993) The improvement of wood durability by retification process. Int Res Group Wood Preserv Sect 24:1–11Google Scholar
  12. Esteves B, Pereira H (2008) Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. BioResources 4:370–404. Google Scholar
  13. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167:353–376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosselin A, Blanchet P, Lehoux N, Cimon Y (2016) Main motivations and barriers for using wood in multi-story and non-residential construction projects. BioResources 12:546–570. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grazide C, Coureau J-L, Cointe A, Morel S (2018) Mechanical performance curves for the strength grading of maritime pine. Eur J Wood Prod 76:877–888. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gustavsson L, Joelsson A, Sathre R (2010) Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building. Energy Build 42:230–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkins JE, Armstrong GT (1954) Physical and thermodynamic properties of terpenes. 1 III. The vapor pressures of α-pinene and β-pinene2. J Am Chem Soc 76:3756–3758. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermoso E, Fernandez-Golfin J, Carballo J (2009) Mechanical properties of structural maritime pine sawn timber from Galicia [Spain] (Pinus pinaster Ait. ssp. atlantica). Investig Agrar Sist Recur 18(2):152–158. (ISSN 1131-7965) Google Scholar
  19. Hildebrandt J, Hagemann N, Thrän D (2017) The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in europe. Sustain Cities Soc 34:405–418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hillis WE, Rozsa AN (1985) High temperature and chemical effects on wood stability. Wood Sci Technol 19:93–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hon DN-S, Shiraishi N (1990) Wood and cellulosic chemistry. Marcel Dekker Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Kačíková D, Kačík F, Čabalová I, Ďurkovič J (2013) Effects of thermal treatment on chemical, mechanical and colour traits in Norway spruce wood. Bioresour Technol 144:669–674. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamdem DP, Pizzi A, Jermannaud A (2002) Durability of heat-treated wood. Holz Roh- Werkst 60:1–6. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kersten PJ, Kopper BJ, Raffa KF, Illman BL (2006) Rapid analysis of abietanes in conifers. J Chem Ecol 32:2679–2685. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee SH, Ashaari Z, Lum WC et al (2018) Thermal treatment of wood using vegetable oils: a review. Constr Build Mater 181:408–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li T, Cheng D, Avramidis S et al (2017) Response of hygroscopicity to heat treatment and its relation to durability of thermally modified wood. Constr Build Mater 144:671–676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd JA (1972) Distributoin of extractives in Pinus Radiata. New Zealand Forest Service 8:288–294Google Scholar
  28. Lloyd WD, Hedrick GW (1965) Levopimaric acid. Org Synth 45:64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loeblich VM, Baldwin DE, O’Connor RT, Lawrence RV (1955) Thermal isomerization of levopimaric acid. J Am Chem Soc 77:6311–6313. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luchi N, Ma R, Capretti P, Bonello P (2005) Systemic induction of traumatic resin ducts and resin flow in Austrian pine by wounding and inoculation with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata. Planta 221:75–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muñoz GR, Estévez ÓS, González JGÁ, Sánchez EM (2014) Influence of provenance, sylvicultural regime and tree shape on the quality of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) timber. Eur J For Res 133:623–630. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parkin BA, Schuller WH, Lawrence RV (1969) Thermal dimerization of rosin. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 8:304–306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penaranda Moren MS, Korjenic A (2017) Hotter and colder—How do photovoltaics and greening impact exterior facade temperatures: the synergies of a multifunctional system. Energy Build 147:123–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Petucco C, Andrés-Domenech P (2018) Land expectation value and optimal rotation age of maritime pine plantations under multiple risks. J For Econ 30:58–70. Google Scholar
  35. Pinto I, Knapic S, Pereira H, Usenius A (2006) Simulated and realised industrial yield sinsawing of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Holz Roh Werkst 64:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Priadi T, Hiziroglu S (2013) Characterization of heat treated wood species. Mater Des 49:575–582. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ren F, Zheng Y-F, Liu X-M et al (2015) Thermal oxidation reaction process and oxidation kinetics of abietic acid. RSC Adv 5:17123–17130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodríguez-García A, López R, Martín JA et al (2014) Resin yield in Pinus pinaster is related to tree dendrometry, stand density and tapping-induced systemic changes in xylem anatomy. For Ecol Manage 313:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosa R, Soares P, Tomé M (2018) Evaluating the economic potential of uneven-aged maritime pine forests. Ecol Econ 143:210–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruel JJ, Ayres MP, Lorio PL Jr (1998) Loblolly pine responds to mechanical wounding with increased resin flow. Can J For Res 28:596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Surini T, Charrier F, Malvestio J et al (2012) Physical properties and termite durability of maritime pine Pinus pinaster Ait., heat-treated under vacuum pressure. Wood Sci Technol 46:487–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Takeda H, Kanno H, Schuller WH, Laurence RV (1968) Effect of temperature on various rosins and pine gum. Industrial Eng Chem Product Res Dev 7:186–189. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu H, Hu Z (1997) Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees 11:135–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS/Univ Pau & Pays Adour, Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physico-Chimie pour l’Environnement et les Matériaux, Xylomat, UMR5254Mont-de-MarsanFrance

Personalised recommendations