Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp 353–365 | Cite as

Performance of cross laminated timber made of oil palm trunk waste for building construction: a pilot study

  • Suthon SrivaroEmail author
  • Nirundorn Matan
  • Frank Lam
Original
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the feasibility of using oil palm trunk wastes for producing cross laminated timber (CLT) for building construction was evaluated. The small size three-layer CLT panels were manufactured using melamine urea formaldehyde adhesive as bonding between the lumber layers. Effects of oil palm wood density and the controlled strain levels of the panel during pressing on the properties of the obtained CLT panels were investigated. Panel thickness (Pt), density (ρ), water absorption (WA), thickness swelling (TS), bonding strength (BS), compressive strength (Fc0) and modulus (Ec0) parallel to the major strength direction, compressive strength (Fc90) and modulus (Ec90) perpendicular to the flat plane and rolling shear strength (RS) of the produced CLT panels were measured. The result showed that oil palm wood density and the controlled strain level had noticeable effect on the properties of the obtained CLT panels. Using high controlled strain level of up to 20.8% and density oil palm wood to produce CLT panels gave better dimensional stability and mechanical properties for the final product but it resulted in an increasing of panel density. Thickness of the produced CLT panels decreased with increasing the controlled strain level during pressing. In view of mechanical properties, Fc0 of CLT made of high-density oil palm wood and all obtained BS met the requirement of the standard CLT but the others were much below. However, the calculation revealed that its application to low-rise building construction seemed to be possible.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Advanced Programme (Contract no. RAP60K0017). The authors would also like to thank AICA Co., Ltd., Songkhla, Thailand for providing MUF adhesives and the Research Center of Excellent on Wood Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Resources, Walailak University, Thailand for providing facilities for experimental work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ANSI/APA PRS-610.1 (2009) Standard for performance-rated structural insulated panels in wall applications. American National Standard Institute, WAGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSI/APA PRG-320 (2011) Standard for Performance-Rated Cross-Laminated Timber. American National Standards Institute, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM D1037-12 (2012) Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-based fiber and particle panel materials. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. ASTM International, West ConshohokenGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D 905-08 (2013) Standard test method for strength properties of adhesive bonds in shear by compression loading. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. ASTM International, West ConshohokenGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodig J, Jayne BA (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandner R (2018) Cross laminated timber (CLT) in compression perpendicular to plane: testing, properties, design and recommendations for harmonizing design provisions for structural timber products. J Struct Eng 171:944–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandner R, Flatscher G, Ringhofer A, Schickhofer G, Thiel A (2016) Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development. Eur J Wood Prod. 74(3):331–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CLT Handbook (2013) Structural design of cross-laminated timber elements. In: CLT Handbook, FPInnovations, BCGoogle Scholar
  9. Dungani R, Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Jasni J, Aprilia S, Hakeem KR, Hartati S, Islam MN (2013) A review on quality enhancement of oil palm trunk waste by resin impregnation: future materials. BioRes 8(2):3136–3156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EN 14080 (2017) Timber structures-glued laminated timber and glued solid timber-requirements. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  11. EN 16351 (2015) Timber structures—Cross laminated timber—requirements. European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. EN 323 (1993) Wood-based panels: determination of density. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. EN 317 (1993) Particleboards and fibreboards: determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  14. EN 408 (2012) Timber structures—structural timber and glued laminated timber—determination of some physical and mechanical properties, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  15. Erwinsyah E (2008) Improvement of oil palm trunk properties using bioresin. Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Esteves B, Ribeiro F, Cruz-Lopes L, Domingos JFI (2017) Densification and heat treatment of Maritime pine wood. Wood Res Slovakia 62(3):373–388Google Scholar
  17. FAO (2018) FAOSTAT Online statistical service. http://www.fao.org/faostat. Accessed 1 Mar 2018
  18. Fathi L (2014) Structural and mechanical properties of the wood from coconut palms, oil palms and date palms. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  19. Gamage N, Setunge S (2014) Modelling of vertical density profile of particleboard, manufactured from hardwood sawmill residue. Wood Math Sci Eng 10(2):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia P, Avramidis S, Lam F (2001) Internal temperature and pressure responses to flake alignment during hot-pressing. Holz Roh Werkst 59(4):272–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1998) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Pergamon press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Hindman DP, Bouldin JC (2015) Mechanical properties of Southern pine cross-laminated timber. J Mater Civ Eng 27(9):04014251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang X, Xie J, Qi J, De Hoop CF, Xiao H, Chen Y, Li F (2018) Differences in physical–mechanical properties of bamboo scrimbers with response to bamboo maturing process. Eur J Wood Prod 76(4):1137–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreuzinger H (1999) Platten, Scheiben und Schalen—Ein Berechnungsmodell für gängige Statikprogramme. (Panels, plates and shells—a computation model for current statics programs) (In German). Bauen mit Holz 1:34–39Google Scholar
  25. Kúdela J, Rousek R, Rademacher P, Rešetka M, Dejmal A (2018) Influence of pressing parameters on dimensional stability and density of compressed beech wood. Eur J Wood Prod 76(4):1241–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurz V (2013) Drying of oil palm lumber: State of the art and potential for improvements. Master thesis, University of Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  27. Kutnar A, Kamke FA, Sernek M (2009) Density profile and morphology of viscoelastic thermal compressed wood. Wood Sci Technol 43:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lam F, Li Y, Li M (2016) Torque loading tests on the rolling shear strength of cross-laminated timber. J Wood Sci 62:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li M (2017) Evaluating rolling shear strength properties of cross laminated timber by short span bending tests and modified planar shear tests. J Wood Sci 63:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y, Lam F (2016) Low cycle fatigue tests and damage accumulation models on the rolling shear strength of cross-laminated timber. J Wood Sci 62:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liao Y, Tu D, Zhou J, Zhou H, Yun H, Gu J, Hu C (2017) Feasibility of manufacturing cross-laminated timber using fast-grown small diameter eucalyptus lumbers. Constr Build Mater 132:508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu Z, Zhou H, Liao Y, Hu C (2018) Effects of surface treatment and adhesives on bond performance and mechanical properties of cross-laminated timber (CLT) made from small diameter Eucalyptus timber. Constr Build Mater 161:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Ceallaigh C, Sikora KS, Harte AM (2018) The influence of panel lay-up on the characteristic bending and rolling shear strength of CLT. Buildings 8(9):114.  https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8090114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruy M, Gonçalves R, Pereira DM, Lorensani RGM, Bertoldo C (2018) Ultrasound grading of round Eucalyptus timber using the Brazilian standard. Eur J Wood Prod 76(3):889–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sikora KS, McPolin DO, Harte AM (2016) Effects of the thickness of cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Irish Sitka spruce on mechanical performance in bending and shear. Constr Build Mater 116:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skyba O, Schwarze FWMR, Niemz P (2009) Physical and mechanical properties of thermo-hygro-mechanically (THM)-densified wood. Wood Res Slovakia 54(2):1–18Google Scholar
  37. Srivaro S, Matan N, Chaowana P, Kyokong B (2014) Investigation of physical and mechanical properties of oil palm wood core sandwich panels overlaid with a rubberwood veneer face. Eur J Wood Prod 72(5):571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srivaro S, Matan N, Lam F (2018) Property gradients in oil palm trunk (Elaeis guineensis). J Wood Sci 64(6):709–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang S, Winistorfer PM, Young TM (2004) Fundamentals of vertical density profile formation in wood composites. Part III: MDF density formation during hot-pressing. Wood Fiber Sci 36(1):17–25Google Scholar
  40. Wang JB, Wei P, Gao Z, Dai C (2018) The evaluation of panel bond quality and durability of hem-fir crosslaminated timber (CLT). Eur J Wood Prod 76(3):833–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiesner F, Randmael F, Wan W, Bisby L, Hadden RM (2017) Structural response of cross-laminated timber compression elements exposed to fire. Fire Saf J 91:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and ResourcesWalailak UniversityNakhon Si ThammaratThailand
  2. 2.Department of Wood ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations