Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 219–227 | Cite as

Sandwich compression of wood: effects of preheating time and moisture distribution on the formation of compressed layer(s)

  • Zhiqiang Gao
  • Rongfeng HuangEmail author
  • Jianmin Chang
  • Ren Li
  • Yanmei Wu
  • Yanwei Wang
Original
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Wood sandwich compression technology can on the one hand effectively improve the physical and mechanical properties of low-density fast-growing wood, on the other hand it saves at least 25 vol% of raw materials (compared to the traditional wood compression technology) by controlling the position of compressed layer(s). In this study, white poplar (Populus tomentosa) lumbers were firstly soaked in water for 2 h, then preheated at 180 °C for 0–600 s. After the preheating process, radial compression was applied to obtain sandwich-compressed wood, and the compression was fixed by superheated steam treatment. Moisture distribution along the wood thickness and density distribution in the compressed wood were characterized. Furthermore, effects of preheating time on moisture distribution, position and thickness of the compressed layer(s) were investigated. Results indicated that the position of the compressed layer(s) moved from the wood surface to the center as a result of preheating time extension. The initial moving speed of the compressed layer(s) was 0.040 mm/s, which was sharply reduced to 0.014 mm/s with the extension of preheating time to 120 s. Further extension of preheating time above 120 s did not extensively reduce the compressed layer(s) moving speed. When the preheating time was 480 s, two compressed layers in the compressed wood converged to one at the center along the thickness in the compressed wood. More importantly, it was found that the positions of the compressed layer(s) highly matched up with high moisture content (MC) regions in the preheating process. A significant linear correlation between positions of the MC peak in high MC region of the preheated lumbers and density peak in the compressed layer(s) was built. In addition, moisture distribution along the thickness of wood can be controlled by adjusting the preheating time to eventually control the position and thickness of the compressed layer(s) in the sandwich-compressed wood. Superheated steam treatment after wood sandwich compression contributed to the reduced set recovery percentage of 1.58% after conditioning at 40 °C and relative humidity of 90%.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China: Formation Mechanism and Controllability of Wood Sandwich Compression by Hydro-thermal Control (Grant No. 31670557).

References

  1. Åkerholm M, Salmén NL (2004) Softening of wood polymers induced by moisture studied by dynamic FTIR spectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci 94(5):2032–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard JN, Rosen HN, Adesanya BA (1983) Temperature, distributions and heat transfer during the drying of lumber. Dry Technol 1(1):117–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai ZY (2008) A new method of determining moisture gradient in wood. For Prod J 58(7/8):41–45Google Scholar
  4. Candan Z, Korkut S, Unsal L (2013) Thermally compressed poplar wood (TCW): physical and mechanical properties. Drvna Ind 64(2):107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Furuta Y, Nakajima M, Nakanii E, Ohkoshi M (2010) The effects of lignin and hemicelluloses on thermal-softening properties of water-swollen wood. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 56(3):132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao ZQ, Huang RF, Lu JX, Chen ZJ, Guo F, Zhan TY (2016) Sandwich compression of wood: control of creating density gradient on lumber thickness and properties of compressed wood. Wood Sci Technol 50(4):833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao ZQ, Zhang YM, Wu ZQ, Wang YW, Li R, Huang RF (2017) Effect of pressurized heat treatment on spring-back of surface compressed poplar wood. China Wood Ind 31(2):15–19Google Scholar
  8. Gong M, Lamason C, Li L (2010) Interactive effect of surface densification and post-heat-treatment on aspen wood. J Mater Process Technol 210(2):293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goring DAI (1963) Thermal softening of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose. Pulp Paper Mag Can 64(12):517–527Google Scholar
  10. Guo J, Song KL, Salmén L, Yin YF (2015) Changes of wood cell walls in response to hygro-mechanical steam treatment. Carbohydr Polym 115:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haque MN (2007) Analysis of heat and mass transfer during high-temperature drying of Pinus radiata. Drying Technol 25(2):379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang RF, Wang YW, Zhao YK, Lu JX, Zhang YM (2012) Sandwich compression of wood by hygro-thermal control. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 58(2):84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inoue M, Norimoto M, Otsuka Y, Yamada T (1991) Surface compression of coniferous wood lumber III. Permanent set of the surface compressed layer by a water solution of low molecular weight phenolic resin. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37(3):234–240Google Scholar
  14. Kamke FA, Rathi VM (2011) Apparatus for viscoelastic thermal compression of wood. Eur J Wood Prod 69(3):483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kutnar A, Kamke FA, Sernek M (2009) Density profile and morphology of viscoelastic thermal compressed wood. Wood Sci Technol 43(1–2):57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laine K, Rautkari L, Hughes M, Kutnar A (2013) Reducing the set-recovery of surface densified solid Scots pine wood by hydrothermal post-treatment. Eur J Wood Prod 71(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laine K, Segerholm K, Wålinder M, Rautkari L, Hughes M (2016) Wood densification and thermal modification: hardness, set-recovery and micromorphology. Wood Sci Technol 50(5):883–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li XJ, Cai ZY, Fu F (2010) A new X-ray scanning method for measuring the internal moisture content in wood drying. Sci Silvae Sin 46(2):122–127Google Scholar
  19. Matsumoto A, Oda H, Arima T, Fujimoto N (2012) Effect of hot-pressing on surface drying-set in sugi columns with pith. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 58(1):23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moutee M, Fortin Y, Laghdir A, Fafard M (2010) Cantilever experimental setup for rheological parameter identification in relation to wood drying. Wood Sci Technol 44(1):31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peres MLD, Delucis RDÁ, Gatto DA, Beltrame R (2016) Mechanical behavior of wood species softened by microwave heating prior to bending. Eur J Wood Prod 74(2):143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Placet V, Cisse O, Boubakar ML (2012) Influence of environmental relative humidity on the tensile and rotational behaviour of hemp fibers. J Mater Sci 47:3435–3446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rautkari L, Laine K, Laflin N, Hughes M (2011) Surface modification of Scots pine: the effect of process parameters on the through thickness density profile. J Mater Sci 46:4780–4786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rautkari L, Laine K, Kutnar A, Medved S, Hughes M (2013) Hardness and density profile of surface densified and thermally modified Scots pine in relation to degree of densification. J Mater Sci 48(6):2370–2375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salmén L, Larsson PA (2018) On the origin of sorption hysteresis in cellulosic materials. Carbohydr Polym 182:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun ZB (2006) Moisture diffusion in bamboo timber during hot-pressing drying. China Wood Ind 20(5):27–29Google Scholar
  27. Tu DY, Su XH, Zhang TT, Fan WJ, Zhou QF (2014) Thermo-mechanical densification of Populus tomentosa var. tomentosa with low moisture content. Bioresources 9(3):3846–3856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang JY, Cooper PA (2005a) Effect of grain orientation and surface wetting on vertical density profiles of thermally compressed fir and spruce. Holz Roh Werkst 63(6):397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang JY, Cooper PA (2005b) Vertical density profiles in thermally compressed balsam fir wood. For Prod J 55(5):65–68Google Scholar
  30. Zhan JF, Avramidis S (2017) Transversal mechanical properties of surface-densified and hydrothermally modified needle fir wood. Wood Sci Technol 51(4):721–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhan TY, Jiang JL, Lu JX, Zhang YL, Chang JM (2018) Influence of hygrothermal condition on dynamic viscoelasticity of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata). Part 1: moisture adsorption. Holzforschung.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2017-0129 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Lab of Wood Science and Technology of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Wood IndustryChinese Academy of ForestryBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Materials Science and TechnologyBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Treessun Flooring CorporationHuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations