, Volume 67, Supplement 2, pp 51–58 | Cite as

Intermittent tinnitus—an empirical description

  • M. Burkart
  • P. Brueggemann
  • A. J. Szczepek
  • D. Frank
  • B. MazurekEmail author
Original articles



Tinnitus is often classified into acute or chronic persistent forms. However, epidemiologic studies have shown that intermittent tinnitus (IT), which does not clearly belong to either category, is the most common form.


The aim of this study was to further characterize IT empirically.

Materials and methods

We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional interview study among 320 subjects with tinnitus. Sociodemographic and tinnitus characteristics, concomitant complaints, perceived triggers, and help-seeking behavior were assessed. Subjects were classified into continuous (CT), IT, or single-episode tinnitus (SET) if they had experienced tinnitus “continuously,” “temporarily time and again,” or “only once but for several days,” respectively, during the past 12 months.


Of the sample, 62% reported IT, 23% SET, and 16% CT. Mean time since onset was 36 (CT), 28 (IT), and 19 months (SET), respectively. Most subjects with IT experienced episodes lasting a few days, whereas in 25%, episodes lasted 1–4 weeks. Mean duration was 1.6 weeks. The frequency of IT episodes ranged from every few days to half-yearly; mean frequency was every 7 weeks. Leading triggers were occupational and private stress. Asthenia, depression, social isolation, psychiatric disorders, and inner ear disorders were more prevalent among CT than IT subjects. Help-seeking behavior was comparable between CT and IT.


IT is associated with emotional reactions and situational impairment severe enough to trigger multiple treatment attempts, but usually does not result in severe impairment. Inner ear disorders and psychological changes are less frequent than in CT; therefore, treatment response and prognosis might be better. We suggest classification of tinnitus into acute single-episode (<3 months), intermittent, or chronic persistent (>3 months) forms.


Psychological phenomena Sociological factors Help-seeking behavior Classification Social behavior 

Intermittierender Tinnitus – eine empirische Beschreibung



This research was funded by Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

B. Mazurek is director and M. Burkart, P. Brueggemann, and A.J. Szczepek are full-time employees of organizations offering tinnitus treatments. D. Frank is managing director of ISM Global Dynamics, the organization conducting the study.

The study was conducted in accordance with the International Code on Market and Social Research of the International Chamber of Commerce/European Society for Opinion and Market Research and current BVM (Berufsverband Deutscher Markt- und Sozialforscher e. V.) guidelines. All respondents gave their consent.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.


  1. 1.
    Andersson G, Vretblad P, Larsen HC et al (2001) Longitudinal follow-up of tinnitus complaints. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Auerbach BD, Rodrigues PV, Salvi RJ (2014) Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis. Front Neurol 5:206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhatt JM, Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N (2016) Prevalence, severity, exposures, and treatment patterns of tinnitus in the United States. Jama Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:959–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruggemann P, Szczepek AJ, Rose M et al (2016) Impact of multiple factors on the degree of tinnitus distress. Front Hum Neurosci 10:341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cima RF, Maes IH, Joore MA et al (2012) Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1951–1959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cornwell BR, Baas JM, Johnson L et al (2007) Neural responses to auditory stimulus deviance under threat of electric shock revealed by spatially-filtered magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 37:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Creswell JD, Taren AA, Lindsay EK et al (2016) Alterations in resting-state functional connectivity link mindfulness meditation with reduced Interleukin-6: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 80:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drew S, Davies E (2001) Effectiveness of Ginkgo biloba in treating tinnitus: double blind, placebo controlled trial. BMJ 322:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flores LS, Teixeira AR, Rosito LP et al (2016) Pitch and loudness from tinnitus in individuals with noise-induced hearing loss. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 20:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall DA, Haider H, Kikidis D et al (2015) Toward a global consensus on outcome measures for clinical trials in tinnitus: report from the first international meeting of the COMiT initiative, November 14, 2014, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Trends Hear 19:1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall DA, Haider H, Szczepek AJ et al (2016) Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults. Trials 17:270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoekstra CE, Wesdorp FM, Van Zanten GA (2014) Socio-demographic, health, and tinnitus related variables affecting tinnitus severity. Ear Hear 35:544–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knippers M, Van DP, Nunes I et al (2013) Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Prog Neurobiol 111:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krauss P, Tziridis K, Metzner C et al (2016) Stochastic resonance controlled upregulation of internal noise after hearing loss as a putative cause of tinnitus-related neuronal hyperactivity. Front Neurosci 10:597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landgrebe M, Azevedo A, Baguley D et al (2012) Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: a proposal for an international standard. J Psychosom Res 73:112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leaver AM, Turesky TK, Seydell-Greenwald A et al (2016) Intrinsic network activity in tinnitus investigated using functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2717–2735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maron-Katz A, Vaisvaser S, Lin T et al (2016) A large-scale perspective on stress-induced alterations in resting-state networks. Sci Rep 6:21503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mazurek B, Haupt H, Olze H et al (2012) Stress and tinnitus-from bedside to bench and back. Front Syst Neurosci 6:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mazurek B, Szczepek AJ, Hebert S (2015) Stress and tinnitus. HNO 63:258–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mccormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S et al (2016) A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity. Hear Res 337:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moller AR (2011) Introduction. In: Moller AR, Langguth B, DeRidder D, Kleinjung T (eds) Textbook of tinnitus. Springer, New York, pp 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oiticica J, Bittar RS (2015) Tinnitus prevalence in the city of Sao Paulo. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 81:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Probst T, Pryss R, Langguth B et al (2016) Emotional states as mediators between tinnitus loudness and tinnitus distress in daily life: results from the “TrackYourTinnitus” application. Sci Rep 6:20382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rauschecker JP, Leaver AM, Muhlau M (2010) Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron 66:819–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seydel C, Haupt H, Szczepek AJ et al (2010) Long-term improvement in tinnitus after modified tinnitus retraining therapy enhanced by a variety of psychological approaches. Audiol Neurootol 15:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shargorodsky J, Curhan GC, Farwell WR (2010) Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus among US adults. Am J Med 123:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shore SE, Roberts LE, Langguth B (2016) Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus – triggers, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 12:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simonetti P, Oiticica J (2015) Tinnitus neural mechanisms and structural changes in the brain: the contribution of neuroimaging research. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 19:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stein A, Wunderlich R, Lau P et al (2016) Clinical trial on tonal tinnitus with tailor-made notched music training. Bmc Neurol 16:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH et al (2014) Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151:S1–S40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zenner HP (2015) S3-Leitlinie 017/064: Chronischer TinnitusGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zenner HP, Vonthein R, Zenner B et al (2013) Standardized tinnitus-specific individual cognitive-behavioral therapy: a controlled outcome study with 286 tinnitus patients. Hear Res 298:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Burkart
    • 1
  • P. Brueggemann
    • 2
  • A. J. Szczepek
    • 3
  • D. Frank
    • 4
  • B. Mazurek
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KGEttlingenGermany
  2. 2.Tinnituszentrum, Campus Charité MitteCharité—Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.HNO Forschungslabor, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Campus Charité MitteCharité—Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.ISM Global Dynamics GmbHBad HomburgGermany

Personalised recommendations