Advertisement

HNO

, Volume 66, Supplement 1, pp 28–33 | Cite as

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome

Diagnosis with vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and fremitus nystagmus
  • R. GürkovEmail author
  • C. Jerin
  • W. Flatz
  • R. Maxwell
Original articles

Abstract

Background

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is a relatively rare neurotological disorder that is characterized by a heterogeneous clinical picture. Recently, vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurement was established for the diagnosis of SCDS. In the present study, a case series of patients with SCDS were analyzed, with a focus on VEMP.

Methods

Four patients with SCDS were prospectively examined with ocular VEMP (oVEMP) and cervical VEMP (cVEMP). The clinical features and the standard audiovestibular test battery results are summarized and analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of VEMP testing is evaluated.

Results

The increased oVEMP amplitudes had a specificity of 100% in this patient population. All patients had normal caloric function and head impulse testing. The Tullio sign was observed in two patients. Three patients had autophony. The air-bone gap was not greater than 10 dB in any of the patients. Two patients had marked fremitus nystagmus. All patients had a bony dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal on computed tomography imaging.

Conclusion

The subjective and clinical features in this case series of SCDS patients were heterogeneous. However, objective oVEMP testing had the highest diagnostic value. Furthermore, we describe a new diagnostic clinical sign: fremitus nystagmus.

Keywords

Inner ear disease Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials Vestibulum auris Vertigo Dizziness 

Dehiszenzsyndrom des oberen Bogengangs

Diagnostik mit vestibulär evozierten myogenen Potenzialen und Fremitusnystagmus

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to David Zee, Lloyd Minor, Paul Carey, Brian Ward for valuable scientific discussions and to Beatrix Lentge and Andrea Roßkopf for excellent technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

R. Gürkov has received research grants from the BMBF, VolkswagenStiftung, outside the submitted work, and consulting fees in the past from Otonomy Inc. C. Jerin, W. Flatz, and R. Maxwell declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

The supplement containing this article is not sponsored by industry.

Supplementary material

Video: Recording of the eye movements under Frenzel goggles, while the patient with left-sided superior canal dehiscence syndrome produces a humming sound (“hmmmmm”). The fast phase of this fremitus nystagmus has two components: a vertical–downward component and a torsional–counterclockwise component. © R. Gürkov, all rights reserved.

References

  1. 1.
    Minor LB et al (1998) Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(3):249–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward BK, Carey JP, Minor LB (2017) Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: Lessons from the First 20 Years. Front Neurol 8:177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Janky KL et al (2013) Air-conducted oVEMPs provide the best separation between intact and superior canal dehiscent labyrinths. Otol Neurotol 34(1):127–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jongkees LB, Maas JP, Philipszoon AJ (1962) Clinical nystagmography. A detailed study of electro-nystagmography in 341 patients with vertigo. Pract Otorhinolaryngol 24:65–93Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kantner C et al (2013) The effects of rise/fall time and plateau time on ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(9):2401–2407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2697-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rahne T, Weiser C, Plontke S (2014) Neurofeedback-controlled comparison of the head elevation versus head rotation and head-hand methods in eliciting cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Audiol Neurootol 19(5):327–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jerin C et al (2015) Enhancing the reproducibility of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials by use of a visual target originating from a head-mounted laser. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(10):2737–2740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maxwell R, Jerin C, Gurkov R (2017) Utilisation of multi-frequency VEMPs improves diagnostic accuracy for Meniere’s disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(1):85–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manzari L et al (2012) Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz fz bone-conducted vibration in superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Ear Hear 33(4):508–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jerin C et al (2014) Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential frequency tuning in certain Meniere’s disease. Hear Res 310:54–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Volgger V et al (2016) Hydropic inner ear disease of the vestibular type. HNO 64(9):676–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manzari L et al (2013) An indicator of probable semicircular canal dehiscence: ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to high frequencies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(1):142–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB (2013) Acoustic and vestibular effects of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. HNO 61(9):743–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cremer PD et al (2000) Eye movements in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome align with the abnormal canal. Neurology 55(12):1833–1841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aw ST et al (2011) Three-dimensional vibration-induced vestibulo-ocular reflex identifies vertical semicircular canal dehiscence. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12(5):549–558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grieser BJ, Kleiser L, Obrist D (2016) Identifying mechanisms behind the Tullio Phenomenon: a computational study based on first principles. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17(2):103–118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Curthoys IS (2017) The new vestibular stimuli: sound and vibration-anatomical, physiological and clinical evidence. Exp Brain Res 235(4):957–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rohrmeier C, Hilber H, Strutz J (2010) Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: a case of Tullio phenomenon. HNO 58(10):1057–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schilder AG et al (2015) Eustachian tube dysfunction: consensus statement on definition, types, clinical presentation and diagnosis. Clin Otolaryngol 40(5):407–411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaski D et al (2012) The Tullio phenomenon: a neurologically neglected presentation. J Neurol 259(1):4–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Westhofen M (2013) Indications for operative therapy of vestibular vertigo and the associated success rates. HNO 61(9):752–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vlastarakos PV et al (2009) Efficacy assessment and complications of surgical management for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a meta-analysis of published interventional studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(2):177–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ziylan F et al (2017) A comparison of surgical treatments for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 38(1):1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silverstein H et al (2014) Round window reinforcement for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a retrospective multi-center case series. Am J Otolaryngol 35(3):286–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-HeilkundeLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Klinische RadiologieLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations