Skip to main content
Log in

Operative Therapie der Narbenhernie

Technische Prinzipien

Operative therapy of secondary ventral hernia

Technical principles

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Narbenhernie, in der angelsächsischen Literatur als sekundäre ventrale Hernie bezeichnet, stellt bei einer Frequenz von bis 20 % und darüber eine häufige Konsequenz einer Laparotomie dar. Die Mehrzahl der betroffenen Patienten ist symptomatisch. Ursächlich wird eine Störung der Kollagensynthese angenommen. Aus diesem Grund ist für die Reparation eine Augmentation mit einem großporigen Kunststoffnetz aus nichtresorbierbarem Material, welches die gesamte ursprüngliche Narbe abdecken und überlappen muss, obligat. Die Netzstrukturen können auf der Faszie („onlay“), retromuskulär („sublay“) oder intraperitoneal („IPOM“) platziert werden. Die letztgenannte Alternative wird bei laparoskopischen Reparationen angewendet. Vorteil dieses Vorgehens ist die reduzierte Rate von Wundkomplikationen. Große Bauchwanddefekte der Mittellinie bedürfen einer Bauchwandrekonstruktion mittels Komponentenseparation (anteriore und posteriore Varianten), die grundsätzlich mit einer Netzaugmentation ergänzt werden muss. Mit diesen Verfahren lassen sich Rezidivraten unter 10 % bei akzeptabler Morbidität erreichen.

Abstract

Secondary ventral hernia or incisional hernia occurs in at least 20 % of cases after laparotomy and most patients are symptomatic. The pathogenesis of incisional hernia is believed to be based on a defect in collagen synthesis indicating the necessity of covering the whole original incision with a non-resorbable, macroporous mesh. These meshes can be used on top of the fascia (onlay), in a retromuscular fashion (sublay) or intraperitoneally (IPOM). The IPOM technique is the preferred procedure during laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. The clear advantage of the laparoscopic approach is the dramatically reduced rate of wound complications, especially infections. Major defects of the abdominal wall require plastic reconstruction with the component separation technique in both anterior and posterior approaches. The component separation technique must be combined with retromuscular mesh augmentation enabling a recurrence rate of less than 10 % and an acceptable morbidity to be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK et al (2009) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg 249:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blinman T (2010) Incisions do not simply sum. Surg Endosc 24:1746–1751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA et al (2011) Abdominal aortic aneurysm and abdominal wall hernia as manifestations of a connective tissue disorder. J Vasc Surg (epub ahead of print)

  4. Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN (2012) The modern management of incisional hernias. BMJ 344:e2843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Henriksen NA, Yadete DH, Sorensen LT et al (2011) Connective tissue alteration in abdominal wall hernia. Br J Surg 98:210–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fachinelli A, Trindade MR, Fachinelli FA (2011) Elastic fibers in the anterior abdominal wall. Hernia 15:409–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz R, Quiles MT, Guillem-Marti J et al (2011) Apoptosis-like cell death induction and aberrant fibroblast properties in human incisional hernia fascia. Am J Pathol 178:2641–2653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burger JW, Lange JF, Halm JA et al (2005) Incisional hernia: early complication of abdominal surgery. World J Surg 29:1608–1613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Israelsson LA (1998) The surgeon as a risk factor for complications of midline incisions. Eur J Surg 164:353–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2011) Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches. Hernia 15:261–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang MK, Clapp ML, Li LT et al (2012) Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. World J Surg (epub ahead of print)

  13. Snyder CW, Graham LA, Vick CC et al (2011) Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and quality of life after elective incisional hernia repair: effects of recurrence and repair technique. Hernia 15:123–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauscher JC, Loh JC, Rieck S et al (2012) Long-term follow-up after incisional hernia repair: are there only benefits for symptomatic patients? Hernia (epub ahead of print)

  15. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S et al (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gronnier C, Wattier JM, Favre H et al (2012) Risk factors for chronic pain after open ventral hernia repair by underlay mesh placement. World J Surg 36:1548–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2009) Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs. Surg Endosc 23:825–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R et al (2007) Improved collagen type I/III ratio at the interface of gentamicin-supplemented polyvinylidenfluoride mesh materials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetraflouroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2012) Posterior and open anterior components separations: a comparative analysis. Am J Surg 203:318–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Geffen HJ van, Simmermacher RK (2005) Incisional hernia repair: abdominoplasty, tissue expansion, and methods of augmentation. World J Surg 29:1080–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klinge U, Park JK, Klosterhalfen B (2013) The ideal mesh? Pathobiology 80:169–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grommes J, Binnebosel M, Klink CD et al (2010) Different methods of mesh fixation in open retromuscular incisional hernia repair: a comparative study in pigs. Hernia 14:623–627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M (2010) One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia 14:575–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bansal VK, Misra MC, Babu D et al (2012) Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Surg Endosc (epub ahead of print)

  26. Liang MK, Clapp ML, Garcia A et al (2012) Mesh shift following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res 177:e7–e13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurian A, Gallagher S, Cheeyandira A, Josloff R (2010) Laparoscopic repair of primary versus incisional ventral hernias: time to recognize the differences? Hernia 14:383–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Celdran-Uriarte A, Fraile M, Garcia-Vasquez C et al (2011) A simplified incision of the external oblique aponeurosis during the components separation technique for the repair of large incisional hernias. Am J Surg 202:e31–e33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghali S, Turza KC, Baumann DP, Butler CE (2012) Minimally invasive component separation results in fewer wound-healing complications than open component separation for large ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 214:981–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD007781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. D. Berger und A. Lux geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Berger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, D., Lux, A. Operative Therapie der Narbenhernie. Chirurg 84, 1001–1012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2245-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2245-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation