Ankle ultrasound for detecting anterior talofibular ligament tear using operative finding as reference standard: a systematic review and meta-analysis
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ankle ultrasound for detection of anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) tear with a reference standard of operative finding.
A computerized search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify relevant original articles on ankle ultrasound for ATFL tear. The pooled proportions of the diagnostic accuracy estimates were assessed using random-effects modeling. We also assessed pooled proportions of the diagnostic accuracy according to injury stage (acute or chronic) and severity of injury (complete or partial). Heterogeneity among studies was determined using the inconsistency index (I2). Meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity.
Ten studies were included. The pooled proportion of the diagnostic accuracy of ankle ultrasound for ATFL was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–0.98). In subgroup analysis, the pooled proportion of the diagnostic accuracy of ankle ultrasound for acute ATFL tear was 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–0.95). The pooled proportion of the diagnostic accuracy of ankle ultrasound for chronic ATFL tear was 0.96 (95% CI 0.84–0.99). The pooled proportions of the diagnostic accuracy for complete and partial ATFL tear were 0.82 (95% CI 0.72–0.89) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.70–0.96), respectively. In the meta-regression analyses, the inclusion of pediatric patients was only significantly different (p = 0.007).
Ankle ultrasound may be a useful diagnostic modality in the detection of ATFL tear in adults and children, regardless of injury stage and severity. For correct diagnosis of ATFL tear, a high-frequency ultrasound probe and sufficient experience of the examiner are mandatory.
KeywordsAnterior talofibular ligament Ligament tear Ankle injury Ankle ultrasound Data accuracy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights statement
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Langner I, Frank M, Kuehn JP, Hinz P, Ekkernkamp A, Hosten N, et al. Acute inversion injury of the ankle without radiological abnormalities: assessment with high-field MR imaging and correlation of findings with clinical outcome. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(4):423–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-1017-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Scillia AJ, Pierce TP, Issa K, Wright C, Callaghan JJ, Festa A, et al. Low ankle sprains: a current review of diagnosis and treatment. Surg Technol Int. 2017;30:411–4.Google Scholar
- 5.Wolfe MW, Uhl TL, Mattacola CG, McCluskey LC. Management of ankle sprains. Am Fam Phys. 2001;63(1):93–104.Google Scholar
- 9.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.Google Scholar
- 18.Margetic P, Pavic R. Comparative assessment of the acute ankle injury by ultrasound and magnetic resonance. Coll Antropol. 2012;36(2):605–10.Google Scholar
- 19.Croy T, Saliba S, Saliba E, Anderson MW, Hertel J. Differences in lateral ankle laxity measured via stress ultrasonography in individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle sprain copers, and healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(7):593–600. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hsu CC, Tsai WC, Chen CPC, Chen MJL, Tang SFT, Shih L. Ultrasonographic examination for inversion ankle sprains associated with osseous injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(10):785–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000237875.90254.4e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Farley FA, Kuhns L, Jacobson JA, DiPietro M. Ultrasound examination of ankle injuries in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(5):604–7.Google Scholar
- 28.Gremeaux V, Coudreuse JM, Collado H, Cohen M, Bensoussan L, Fondarai J, et al. Comparative study of clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation of lateral collateral ligament sprains of the ankle. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2009;49(3):285–91.Google Scholar
- 31.Lee KT, Park YU, Jegal H, Park JW, Choi JP, Kim JS. New method of diagnosis for chronic ankle instability: comparison of manual anterior drawer test, stress radiography and stress ultrasound. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(7):1701–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2690-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Cho JH, Lee DH, Song HK, Bang JY, Lee KT, Park YU. Value of stress ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic ankle instability compared to manual anterior drawer test, stress radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1022–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3828-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Glaser F, Friedl W, Welk E. The value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of capsule ligament injuries of the upper ankle joint. Unfallchirurg. 1989;92(11):540–6.Google Scholar
- 50.Melniker LA, Leibner E, McKenney MG, Lopez P, Briggs WM, Mancuso CA. Randomized controlled clinical trial of point-of-care, limited ultrasonography for trauma in the emergency department: the first sonography outcomes assessment program trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(3):227–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar