Advertisement

Severe head injury in elderly: 6-year comparison of treatment and outcome between southern Finland and Navarra (Spain)

  • Bismil Ali AliEmail author
  • Tuomas Brinck
  • Lauri Handolin
  • Tomas Belzunegui Otano
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the profile, treatment and outcome of elderly patients with severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI) between southern Finland and Navarra (Spain).

Methods

Data collected from, 2010 to 2015, in the Major Trauma Registry of Navarra (MTR-N) and the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR) were compared. Patients with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) ≥ 16 and age ≥ 65 with isolated severe TBI were considered. Patients who had been admitted to the hospital ≥ 24 h after the trauma, had been pronounced dead before hospital arrival, or had been injured by hanging, drowning or burns, were excluded. Outcome was defined by 30-day hospital mortality. The expected mortality was calculated using the Revised Injury Severity Classification score II (RISC II). Other compared data included demographics, injury mechanism, pre-hospital and hospital treatment, and time intervals.

Results

A total of 305 (MTR-N) and 137 (HTR) patients were included in the outcome analysis. The standardized mortality ratio with 95% confidence interval was for MTR-N 1.4 (1.1–1.6) and for HTR 0.8 (0.6–1.1). Patients in Navarra were older (average 79.7 vs. 75.0) while in southern Finland the percentage of pre-hospital intubation in patients with GCS ≤ 8 (75.0% vs 50.0%) and ICU admission (72.2% vs 22.0%) were higher.

Conclusion

The better adjusted outcome of elderly patients with severe TBI in southern Finland in comparison to Navarra could be due to higher rate of pre-hospital intubation and/or higher rate of ICU admissions in southern Finland. Increasing number of elderly patients with severe TBI necessitate uniformly accepted protocols in pre- and in-hospital management.

Keywords

Elderly trauma patients Severe traumatic brain injury Major trauma Trauma registry Benchmarking 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Bismil Ali, Tuomas Brinck, Lauri Handolin and Tomas Belzunegui declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Permission note (ethics)

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Health of the government of Navarra. The subjects gave their informed consent to the work. The investigation carried out was approved and evaluated by the National Agency for Quality and Accreditation of Spain, ANECA. This study has also been approved by the review board of the Helsinki University Hospital.

References

  1. 1.
    Ringdal KG, Coats TJ, Lefering R, Di Bartolomeo S, Steen PA, Røise O, Handolin L, Lossius HM. The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma: a joint revision by SCANTEM, TARN, DGU-TR and RITG. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2008;16:7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grossman MD, Ofurum U, Stehly CD, Stoltzfus J. Long-term survival after major trauma in geriatric trauma patients: the glass is half full. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1181–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams SD, Holcomb JB. Geriatric trauma. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(6):520–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHO, Geneva: Switzerland; 2010. World Health Organisation. Definition of an older or elderly person. Accessed 12/11/2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sammy I, Lecky F, Sutton A, Leaviss J, O’cathain A. Factors affecting mortality in older trauma patients—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inj Int J Care Inj. 2016;47:1170–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aitken LM, Burmeister E, Lang J, Chaboyer W, Richmond TS. Characteristics and outcomes of injured older adults after hospital admission. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(3):442–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Champion HR, Copes WS, Buyer D, Flanagan ME, Bain L, Sacco WJ. Major trauma in geriatric patients. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(9):1278–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Padrón-Monedero A, Damián J, Pilar Martin M, Fernández-Cuenca R. Mortality trends for accidental falls in older people in Spain, 2000–2015. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17:276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alberdi F, García I, Atutxa L, Zabarte M. Epidemiology of severe trauma. Med intensiva. 2014;38(9):580–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson HJ, McCormick WC, Kagan SH. Traumatic brain injury in older adults: epidemiology, outcomes and future implications. JAGS. 2006;54:1590–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peck KA, Calvo RY, Sise CB, Johnson J, Yen JW, Sise MJ, Dunne CE, Badiee J, Shackford SR, Lobatz MA. Death after discharge: predictors of mortality in older brain injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:978–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson HJ, Weir S, Rivara FP, Wang J, Sullivan SD, Salkever D, MacKenzie EJ. Utilization and costs of health care after geriatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1864–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lefering R, Paffrath T, Linker R, Bouillon B, Neugebauer EA. German Society for Trauma Surgery. Head injury and outcome—what influence do concomitant injuries have? J Trauma. 2008;65:1036–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ali Ali B, Lefering R, Fortun Moral M, Belzunegui Otano T. Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®). Scand J Trauma Resuscitation Emerg Med. 2017;25:107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The ATSL Subcommittee, American College of Surgen´s Committee on Trauma, and The International ATSL working group. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:1363–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thies K, Deakin CD, Lott C, Robinson D, Sabbe MB, Arafat R, Brattebo G, Lippert FK, Rommens PM, Voiglio EJ. The European trauma course—trauma teaching goes European. Resuscitation. 2013;85:19–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ali Ali B, Lefering R, Otano Belzunegui T. Quality assessment of Major Trauma Registry of Navarra: completeness and correctness. Int J Injury Control Saf Promotion.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2018.1515229.
  18. 18.
    Heinänen M, Brinck T, Handolin L, Mattila VM, Söderlund T. Accuracy and coverage of diagnosis and procedural coding of severely injured patients in the finnish hospital discharge register: comparison to patient files and the Helsinki Trauma Registry. Scand J Surg. 2017;106(3):269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGUTM: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Court-Brown C, Pape HC. Severe and multiple trauma in older patients; incidence and mortality. Injury. 2009;40(4):362–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang HE, Cook LJ, Chang CC, Yealy DM, Lave JR. Outcomes after out-of hospital endotracheal intubation errors. Resuscitation. 2009;80:50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cranshaw J, Nolan J. Airway management after major trauma. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2006;6:124–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haddad SH, Arabi YM. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kinoshita K. Traumatic brain injury: Pathophysiology for neurocritical care. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chatrath V, Khetarpal R, Ahuja J. Fluid management in patients with trauma: restrictive versus liberal approach. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(3):308–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huber-Wagner S, Mand C, Ruchholtz S, Kuhne CA, Holzapfel K, Kanz KG, Griensven MV, Biberthaler P, Lefering R. the Trauma Register DGU. Effect of the localization of the CT scanner during trauma resuscitation on survival—a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet. 2009;373:1455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. The Lancet. 1975;305:480–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Logan PA, Coupland CA, Gladman JR, Sahota O, Stoner-Hobbs V, Robertson K, Tomlinson V, Ward M, Sach T, Avery AJ. Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c2102–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE (UK) Falls: assessment and prevention of falls in older people. In: NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 161. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence;2013.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raj R, Siironen J, Kivisaari R, Kuisma M, Brinck T, Lappalainen J, Skrifvars MB. Factors correlating with delayed trauma center admission following traumatic brain injury. Scand J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;21:67.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fleischman RJ, Adams AL, Hedges JR, Ma OJ, Mullins RJ, Newgard CD. The optimum follow-up period for assessing mortality outcomes in injured elders. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(10):1843–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lefering R, Paffrath T, Bouamra O, Coats TJ, Woodford M, Jenks T, Wafaisade A, Nienaber U, Lecky F. Epidemiology of in-hospital trauma deaths. Europ J Trauma Emerg Med. 2012;38:3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hansen L, Shaheen A, Crandall M. Outpatient follow-up after traumatic injury: challenges and opportunities. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014;7(4):256–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bismil Ali Ali
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tuomas Brinck
    • 2
  • Lauri Handolin
    • 2
  • Tomas Belzunegui Otano
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Accident and Emergency DepartmentComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Health service of Navarra-OsasunbideaPamplonaSpain
  2. 2.Trauma Unit, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of HealthPublic University of NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations