Advertisement

Predictive capability of the injury severity score versus the new injury severity score in the categorization of the severity of trauma patients: a cross-sectional observational study

  • Rebeca Abajas Bustillo
  • Francisco José Amo Setién
  • María del Carmen Ortego Mate
  • María Seguí Gómez
  • María Jesús Durá Ros
  • César Leal Costa
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The AIS scale is a measurement tool for single injuries. The ISS is considered the gold standard for determining the severity of injured patients, and the NISS was developed to improve the ISS with respect to loss of information, as well as to facilitate its calculation. The aim of this study was to analyse what injury severity measure, calculated according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), 1998 and 2005 (update 2008) versions, performs better with mortality, cost and hospital length of stay healthcare indicators.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was carried out between February 1st 2012 and February 1st 2013. Inclusion criteria were injured patients due to external causes admitted to trauma service through the emergency department. Manual coding of all injuries was performed and ISS and NISS scores were calculated for both versions of the AIS scale. Severity was then compared to mortality (in-hospital and at 30 days), healthcare cost, and length of hospital stay.

Results

The index with the best predictive capability for in-hospital mortality was NISS 05 (AUC = 0.811). There was a significant increase in hospital stay and healthcare cost in the most severe patients in all indexes, except for ISS 05.

Conclusions

NISS is found to be an index with higher predictive capability for in-hospital mortality and correlates better to length of hospital stay and healthcare cost.

Keywords

Abbreviated injury scale Clinical coding Injury severity score Patient acuity Trauma severity indexes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to doctors Fernando Rojo and Tomás Belzunegui for providing access to data, to the members of the Nursing School of the University of Cantabria for their support and to Montse Ruiz for the translation of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Association for the Advancement for Automotive Medicine. Escala de Lesiones Abreviada 2005. Actualización 2008. Ed. Des Plaines: AAAM; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salottolo K, Settell A, Uribe P, Akin S, Slone DS, O’Neal E, et al. The impact of the AIS 2005 revision on injury severity scores and clinical outcome measures. Injury. 2009;40(9):99–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leth PM, Ibsen M. Abbreviated injury scale scoring in traffic fatalities: comparison of computerized tomography and autopsy. J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1413–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker SP, O’neill B, Haddon W, Long WB. The injury severity score: development and potential usefulness. Proc Am Assoc Automot Med Annu Conf. 1974;18:58–74.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1997;43(6):922–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Association for the Advancement for Automotive Medicine. The abbreviated injury scale. Revision 1990. Ed. Des Plaines: AAAM; 1990.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Association for the Advancement for Automotive Medicine. The abbreviated injury scale. Revision 1990. Update 1998. Ed. Des Plaines: AAAM; 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lavoie A, Moore L, LeSage N, Liberman M, Sampalis JS. The new Injury Severity Score: a more accurate predictor of in-hospital mortality than the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2004;56(6):1312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haider AH, Villegas CV, Saleem T, Efron DT, Stevens KA, Oyetunji TA, et al. Should the IDC-9 trauma mortality prediction model become the new paradigm for benchmarking trauma outcomes? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 72(6):1695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nogueira L, Domingues C, Campos M, Sousa R. Ten years of new injury severity score (NISS): is it a possible change? Rev Lat Am. 2008;16(2):314–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Belleghem G, Devos S, De Wit L, Hubloue I, Lauwaert D, Pien K, et al. Predicting in-hospital mortality of traffic victims: a comparison between AIS-and ICD-9-CM-related injury severity scales when only ICD-9-CM is reported. Injury. 2016;47(1):141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    OMS. Informe sobre la situación mundial de la seguridad vial: es hora de pasar a la acción. Ginebra; 2009. Available at: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/report/web_version_es.pdf.
  13. 13.
    European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and The Council Saving Lives. Boosting Car Safety in the EU Reporting on the monitoring and assessment of advanced vehicle safety features, their cost effectiveness and feasibility for the review of the regulations on general vehicle safety and on the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road users. 2016; COM/2016/0787 final.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abajas R, Leal C, Ortego MC, Zonfrillo M, Seguí M, Durá M. Grado de correlación entre las versiones 98 y 2005 (actualización 2008) de la Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) en la categorización del paciente traumatológico grave. Emergencias. 2018;30:41–4.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Copes W, Champion H, Sacco W, Lawnick M, Keast S, Bain L. The injury severity score revisited. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1988;28(1):69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stewart KE, Cowan LD, Thompson DM. Changing to AIS 2005 and agreement of injury severity scores in a trauma registry with scores based on manual chart review. Injury. 2011;42(9):934–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lemeshow S, Hosmer Jr DW. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115(1):92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorra AS, Clark DE, Mullins RJ. Using hospital outcomes to predict 30-day mortality among injured patients insured by Medicare. Arch Surg. 2011;146(2):195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mullins RJ, Mann NC, Hedges JR, Worrall W, Helfand M, Zechnich AD, et al. Adequacy of hospital discharge status as a measure of outcome among injured patients. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1727–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clark DE, DeLorenzo MA, Lucas F, Wennberg DE. Epidemiology and short-term outcomes of injured medicare patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(12):2023–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pérez K, Cirera E, Plaséncia A. Estudio de la Mortalidad a 30 días por Accidentes de Tráfico (EMAT-30). Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo ed.: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2004.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D, Gibson N, Yeo A. Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20(1):63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ringdal KG, Coats TJ, Lefering R, Di Bartolomeo S, Steen PA, Røise O, et al. The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma: a joint revision by SCANTEM, TARN, DGU-TR and RITG. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008;16(1):7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Balogh ZJ, Varga E, Tomka J, Süveges G, Tóth L, Simonka JA. The new injury severity score is a better predictor of extended hospitalization and intensive care unit admission than the injury severity score in patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(7):508–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tohira H, Jacobs I, Matsuoka T, Ishikawa K. Impact of the version of the abbreviated injury scale on injury severity characterization and quality assessment of trauma care. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao X, Zhang M, Gan J, Xu S, Jiang G. Comparison of the new injury severity score and the injury severity score in multiple trauma patients. Chin J Traumatol (English Edition). 2008;11(6):368–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aharonson-Daniel L, Giveon A, Stein M, Israel Trauma Group (ITG), Peleg K. Different AIS triplets: different mortality predictions in identical ISS and NISS. J Trauma. 2006;61(3):711–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rutledge R. The injury severity score is unable to differentiate between poor care and severe injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1996;40(6):944–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.112 Emergency Center of Castilla y León, School of NursingUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
  3. 3.Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, University of Virginia School of MedicineCharlottesvilleUSA
  4. 4.University of MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations